CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 146Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchizophrenia research and treatmentCultural Competency in Health Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A cross-cultural study of employers’ concerns about hiring people with psychotic disorder: implications for recovery

Tsang, Hector W.H., Angell, Beth, Corrigan, Patrick W., Lee, Yueh-Ting, Shi, Kan, Lam, Chow S., Jin, Shenghua, Fung, Kevin M.T.·2007·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
DOI 10.1007/s00127-007-0208-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction Employment discrimination is considered as a major impediment to community integration for people with serious mental illness, yet little is known about how the problem manifests differently across western and non-western societies. We developed a lay model based on Chinese beliefs and values in terms of Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and folk religions which may be used to explain cross-cultural variation in mental illness stigma, particularly in the arena of employment discrimination. In this study, we tested this lay approach by comparing employers' concerns about hiring people with psychotic disorder for entry-level jobs in US and China.Method One hundred employers (40 from Chicago, 30 from Hong Kong, and 30 from Beijing) were randomly recruited from small size firms and interviewed by certified interviewers using a semi-structured interview guide designed for this study. Content analysis was used to derive themes, which in turn were compared across the three sites using chi-square tests.Results Analyses reveal that employers express a range of concerns about hiring an employee with mental illness. Although some concerns were raised with equal frequency across sites, comparisons showed that, relative to US employers, Chinese employers were significantly more likely to perceive that people with mental illness would exhibit a weaker work ethic and less loyalty to the company. Comparison of themes also suggests that employers in China were more people-oriented while employers in US were more task-oriented.Conclusion Cultural differences existed among employers which supported the lay theory of mental illness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-007-0208-x

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Fung MT (2006) Relationship between self-stigma of people with psychotic disorder and their adherence to psychosocial treatment. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
  2. Kopelowicz A, Aguirre F, Liberman RP, Mintz J, Wallace CJ (2006) Differential performance of job skills in schizophrenia: an experimental analysis. J Rehabil 72:31–39
  3. Lin YT (1983) The Wisdom of confucius. Modern library, New York
  4. Rochlin J (1987) Rehabilitation: an employer’s perspective. Rehabil Educ, 1:89–94
  5. Wansborough N, Cooper P (1980) Open employment after psychotic disorder. Tavistock Publications, London
  6. Wilgosh L, Skaret D (1987) Employer attitudes toward hiring individuals with disabilities: a review of the recent literature. Can J Rehabil 1:89–98

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–146 of 146

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tsang, H. W. H., Angell, B., Corrigan, P. W., Lee, Y.-T., Shi, K., Lam, C. S., Jin, S., & Fung, K. M. T.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
  • Minot State University (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tsang, Hector W.H.
ORCID
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-05-23
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
723-733
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
DOI
10.1007/s00127-007-0208-x
OpenAlex
W1992850587
Cited by
146
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Hong Kong
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA014842-01, R01AA014842)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
employment discrimination, psychosis, mental health stigma, cross-cultural comparison, Confucianism, work ethic, employee loyalty, social reintegration, severe mental illness
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Buddhism, China, Convalescence, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Employee Performance Appraisal, Employment, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Personnel Management, Psychotic Disorders, United States, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review