Cited by 132Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Prevalence and risk of psychiatric disorders as a function of variant rape histories: results from a national survey of women

Open access
Zinzow, Heidi M., Resnick, Heidi S., McCauley, Jenna L., Amstadter, Ananda B., Ruggiero, Kenneth J., Kilpatrick, Dean G.·2012·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose Rape is an established risk factor for mental health disorders, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive episodes (MDE), and substance use disorders. The majority of studies have not differentiated substance-involved rape or examined comorbid diagnoses among victims. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of common trauma-related psychiatric disorders (and their comorbidity) in a national sample of women, with an emphasis on distinguishing between rape tactics. A secondary objective was to estimate the risk for psychiatric disorders among victims of variant rape tactics, in comparison to non-victims. Methods A nationally representative population-based sample of 3,001 non-institutionalized, civilian, English or Spanish speaking women (aged 18-86 years) participated in a structured telephone interview assessing rape history and DSM-IV criteria for PTSD, MDE, alcohol abuse (AA), and drug abuse (DA). Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed. Results Women with rape histories involving both substance facilitation and forcible tactics reported the highest current prevalence of PTSD (36%), MDE (36%), and AA (20%). Multivariate models demonstrated that this victim group was also at highest risk for psychiatric disorders, after controlling for demographics and childhood and multiple victimization history. Women with substance-facilitated rapes reported higher prevalence of substance abuse in comparison to women with forcible rape histories. Comorbidity between PTSD and other psychiatric disorders was higher among rape victims in comparison to non-rape victims. Conclusions Researchers and clinicians should assess substance-facilitated rape tactics and attend to comorbidity among rape victims. Empirically supported treatments are needed to address the complex presentations observed among women with variant rape histories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-011-0397-1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 12-25% of sexual assault survivors meet criteria for current PTSD.

    “Studies assessing PTSD in relation to any trauma exposure (not necessarily due to sexual assault) indicate that 36% of sexual assault survivors meet criteria for lifetime PTSD (Dworkin, 2020) and 12-25% meet criteria for current PTSD (Kilpatrick et al., 2007; Resnick et al., 1993; Zinzow et al., 2012).”

    From PTSD in the Year Following Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Zinzow et al., 2012

    The Results > Current diagnoses section reports current PTSD in approximately 16% of women with drug- or alcohol-facilitated/incapacitated rape histories and 21% of women with forcible rape histories, both within the cited range. But the paper also reports 36% among women whose rape histories involved both tactics, so 12–25% does not cover all the survivor groups it studied. The study concerns women with adult rape histories, rather than sexual assault survivors generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cross-sectional studies show 12-25% of survivors meet criteria for current PTSD at any given time.

    “cross-sectional studies that show 12-25% of survivors meet criteria for current PTSD at any given time (Kilpatrick et al., 2007; Resnick et al., 1993; Zinzow et al., 2012).”

    From PTSD in the Year Following Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Zinzow et al., 2012

    The Results > Current diagnoses section reports current PTSD in approximately 16% of substance-facilitated rape victims and 21% of forcible rape victims, within the claimed range. But the Abstract > Results reports 36% among women whose rapes involved both tactics, so 12–25% does not cover all survivor groups in this study. The Method > Measures section defines “current” as the past six months, rather than PTSD at a single point in time; page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [4]Kilpatrick DG Acierno R Resnick HS Saunders BE Best CL 1997 A 2-year longitudinal analysis of the relationship between violent assault and substance abuse in women J Consult Clin Psychol 65 834 847 9337502
  2. [7]Abbey A BeShears R Clinton-Sherrod AM McAuslan P 2004 Similarities and differences in women’s sexual assault experiences based on tactics used by perpetrator Psychol Women Q 28 323 332 PMC4527559 26257466
  3. [8]Brown AL Testa M Messman-Moore TL 2009 Psychological consequences of sexual victimization resulting from force, incapacitation, or verbal coercion Violence Against Women 15 898 919 19502576 PMC2761643
  4. [9]Kessler RC Sonnega A Bromet E Hughes M Nelson CB 1995 Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Arch Gen Psychiatry 52 1048 1060 7492257
  5. [12]Burnam MA Stein JA Golding JM Siegel JM Sorenson SB Forsythe AB Telles CA 1988 Sexual assault and mental disorders in a community population J Consult Clin Psychol 56 6 843 850 3264558
  6. [13]McFarlane A 2004 The contribution of epidemiology to the study of traumatic stress Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 39 874 882 15549239
  7. [15]Kilpatrick DG 2004 What is violence against women? Defining and measuring the problem J Interpers Violence 19 11 1209 1234 15534326
  8. [18]McCauley JL Ruggiero KJ Resnick HS Kilpatrick DG 2010 Incapacitated, forcible, and drug-alcohol facilitated rape in relation to binge drinking, marijuana use, and illicit drug use: Results from a national survey J Trauma Stress 23 132 140 20135676
  9. [20]Testa M Livingston JA Vanzile-Tamsen C Frone MR 2003 The role of women’s substance use in vulnerability to forcible and incapacitated rape J Stud Alcohol 64 756 764 14743937
  10. [22]Acierno R Resnick H Kilpatrick DG Saunders B Best CL 1999 Risk factors for rape, physical assault, and posttraumatic stress disorder in women: examination of differential multivariate relationships J Anxiety Disord 13 6 541 563 10688523
  11. [23]Ruggiero KJ Smith DW Hanson RF Resnick HS Saunders BE Kilpatrick DG Best CL 2004 Is disclosure of childhood rape associated with mental health outcome? Results from the National Women’s Study Child Maltreatment 9 1 62 77 14870998
  12. [25]Kilpatrick DG Acierno R Schnurr PP Saunders B Resnick HS Best CL 2000 Risk factors for adolescent substance abuse and dependence: data from a national sample J Consult Clin Psychol 68 19 30 10710837
  13. [26]Kaysen D Neighbors C Martell J Fossos N Larimer ME 2006 Incapacitated rape and alcohol use: a prospective analysis Addict Behav 31 1820 1832 16446044 PMC1893005
  14. [27]Testa M Livingston JA Hoffman JH 2007 Does sexual victimization predict subsequent alcohol consumption? A prospective study among a community sample of women Addict Behav 32 2926 2939 17597304 PMC2045636

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zinzow, H. M., Resnick, H. S., McCauley, J. L., Amstadter, A. B., Ruggiero, K. J., & Kilpatrick, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Zinzow, Heidi M.
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2011-05-21
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
893-902
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2092034562
Cited by
132
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
16.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA023099)
  • National Institute of Justice
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
rape, sexual assault, forcible rape, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive episode, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, substance use disorders, psychiatric comorbidity, women, prevalence, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Rape, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review