Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis

Open access
Trzeciak, Stephen, McCoy, Jonathan V., Phillip Dellinger, R., Arnold, Ryan C., Rizzuto, Michael, Abate, Nicole L., Shapiro, Nathan I., Parrillo, Joseph E., Hollenberg, Steven M., on behalf of the Microcirculatory Alterations in Resuscitation and Shock (MARS) investigators·2008·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

ObjectiveSepsis mortality is closely linked to multi-organ failure, and impaired microcirculatory blood flow is thought to be pivotal in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced organ failure. We hypothesized that changes in microcirculatory flow during resuscitation are associated with changes in organ failure over the first 24 h of sepsis therapy.DesignProspective observational study.SettingEmergency Department and Intensive Care Unit.ParticipantsSeptic patients with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg despite intravenous fluids or lactate ≥4.0 mM/L treated with early goal-directed therapy (EGDT).Measurements and resultsWe performed Sidestream Dark Field (SDF) videomicroscopy of the sublingual microcirculation <3 h from EGDT initiation and again within a 3–6 h time window after initial. We imaged five sites and determined the mean microcirculatory flow index (MFI) (0 no flow to 3 normal) blinded to all clinical data. We calculated the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 0 and 24 h, and defined improved SOFA a priori as a decrease ≥2 points. Of 33 subjects; 48% improved SOFA over 0–24 h. Age, APACHE II, and global hemodynamics did not differ significantly between organ failure groups. Among SOFA improvers, 88% increased MFI during EGDT, compared to 47% for non-improvers (P = 0.03). Median change in MFI was 0.23 for SOFA improvers versus −0.05 for non-improvers (P = 0.04).ConclusionsIncreased microcirculatory flow during resuscitation was associated with reduced organ failure at 24 h without substantial differences in global hemodynamics. These data support the hypothesis that targeting the microcirculation distinct from the macrocirculation could potentially improve organ failure in sepsis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-008-1193-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 488

Metadata

Authors
Trzeciak, S., McCoy, J. V., Phillip Dellinger, R., Arnold, R. C., Rizzuto, M., Abate, N. L., Shapiro, N. I., Parrillo, J. E., Hollenberg, S. M., & on behalf of the Microcirculatory Alterations in Resuscitation and Shock (MARS) investigators
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2008-07-02
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
2210-2217
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2006216692
Cited by
488
References
3
FWCI
18.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00134-008-1193-6
The paper
Trzeciak, S., McCoy, J. V., Phillip Dellinger, R., Arnold, R. C., Rizzuto, M., Abate, N. L., Shapiro, N. I., Parrillo, J. E., Hollenberg, S. M., & on behalf of the Microcirculatory Alterations in Resuscitation and Shock (MARS) investigators. (2008). Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1193-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.