Cited by 162Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Inter-rater reliability of manual muscle strength testing in ICU survivors and simulated patients

Open access
Fan, Eddy, Ciesla, Nancy D., Truong, Alex D., Bhoopathi, Vinodh, Zeger, Scott L., Needham, Dale M.·2010·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Objective The goal of the paper is to determine inter-rater reliability of trained examiners performing standardized strength assessments using manual muscle testing (MMT). Design, subjects, and setting The authors report on 19 trainees undergoing quality assurance within a multi-site prospective cohort study. Intervention Inter-rater reliability for specially trained evaluators ("trainees") and a reference rater, performing MMT using both simulated and actual patients recovering from critical illness was evaluated. Measurements and results Across 26 muscle groups tested by 19 trainee-reference rater pairs, the median (interquartile range) percent agreement and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 95% CI) were: 96% (91, 98%) and 0.98 (0.95, 1.00), respectively. Across all 19 pairs, the ICC (95% CI) for the overall composite MMT score was 0.99 (0.98-1.00). When limited to actual patients, the ICC was 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.00). The agreement (kappa; 95% CI) in detecting clinically significant weakness was 0.88 (0.44-1.00). Conclusions MMT has excellent inter-rater reliability in trained examiners and is a reliable method of comprehensively assessing muscle strength.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-010-1796-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Handgrip dynamometry can assess muscle function.

    “Handgrip dynamometry can assess muscle function [23].”

    From ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Methods section (“Manual muscle strength testing,” page unavailable) describes scoring muscle strength with the Medical Research Council scale, and the Discussion addresses manual muscle testing. Searches for “handgrip dynamometry” and grip strength measured with a dynamometer found no passage in our copy stating that handgrip dynamometry can assess muscle function. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [2]Stevens RD Dowdy DW Micheals RK Mendez-Tellez PA Pronovost PJ Needham DM 2007 Neuromuscular dysfunction acquired in critical illness: a systematic review Intensive Care Med 33 1876 1891 17639340
  2. [3]Nanas S Kritikos K Angelopoulos E Siafaka A Tsikriki S Poriazi M Kanaloupiti D Kontogeorgi M Pratikaki M Zervakis D Routsi C Roussos C 2008 Predisposing factors for critical illness polyneuropathy in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit Acta Neurol Scand 118 175 181 18355395
  3. [4]Guarneri B Bertolini G Latronico N 2008 Long-term outcome in patients with critical illness myopathy or neuropathy: the Italian multicenter CRIMYNE study J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79 838 841 18339730
  4. [5]Ali NA O'Brien JM Jr Hoffmann SP Phillips G Garland A Finley JC Almoosa K Hejal R Wolf KM Lemeshow S Connors AF Jr Marsh CB Midwest Critical Care Consortium 2008 Acquired weakness, handgrip strength, and mortality in critically ill patients Am J Respir Crit Care Med 178 261 268 18511703
  5. [6]Hughes VA Frontera WR Wood M Evans WJ Dallal GE Roubenoff R Fiatarone Singh MA 2001 Longitudinal muscle strength changes in older adults: influence of muscle mass, physical activity, and health J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56 B209 B217 11320101
  6. [7]Steffensen BF Lyager S Werge B Rahbek J Mattsson E 2002 Physical capacity in non-ambulatory people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy or spinal muscular atrophy: a longitudinal study Dev Med Child Neurol 44 623 632 12227617
  7. [8]Carin-Levy G Greig C Young A Lewis S Hannan J Mead G 2006 Longitudinal changes in muscle strength and mass after acute stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 21 201 207 16401884
  8. [9]De Jonghe B Sharshar T Lefaucheur JP Authier FJ Durand-Zaleski I Boussarsar M Cerf C Renaud E Mesrati F Carlet J Raphael JC Outin H Bastuji-Garin S Groupe de Reflexion et d'Etude des Neuromyopathies en Reanimation 2002 Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study JAMA 288 2859 2867 12472328
  9. [11]Polard H Lakay B Tucker F Watson E Bablis P 2005 Interexaminer reliability of the deltoid and psoas muscle test J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18 52 56 15726035
  10. [12]Gregson JM Leathley MJ Moore P Smith TL Sharma AK Watkins CL 2000 Reliability of measure tones and muscle power in stroke patients Age Aging 29 223 228 10855904
  11. [13]Florence JM Pandya S King WM Robison JD Signore LC Wentzell M Province MA 1984 Clinical trials in Duchenne dystrophy: standardization and evaluation of reliability procedures Phys Ther 64 41 45 6361809
  12. [14]Kleyweg RP Meche FGA Schmitz PI 1991 Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities Guillain-Barre syndrome Muscle Nerve 14 1103 1109 1745285
  13. [15]Needham DM Dennison CR Dowdy DW Mendez-Tellez PA Ciesla N Desai SV Sevransky J Shanholtz C Scharfstein D Herridge MS Pronovost PJ 2005 Study protocol: the improving care of acute lung injury patients (ICAP) study Crit Care 10 R9 16420652 PMC1550857
  14. [17]Perry J Weiss WB Burnfield JM Gronley JK 2004 The supine hip extensor manual muscle test: a reliability and validity study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 1345 1350 15295763
  15. [18]Barr AE Diamond BE Wade CK Harashima T Pecorella WA Potts CC Rosenthal H Fleiss JL McMahon DJ 1991 Reliability of testing measures in Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72 315 319 2009048
  16. [19]Escolar DM Henricson EK Mayhew J Florence J Leshner R Patel KM Clemens PR 2001 Clinical evaluator reliability for quantitative and manual muscle testing measures of strength in children Muscle Nerve 24 787 793 11360262
  17. [20]Caruso W Leisman G 2000 A force/displacement analysis of muscle testing Percept Mot Skills 91 683 692 11065332

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, E., Ciesla, N. D., Truong, A. D., Bhoopathi, V., Zeger, S. L., & Needham, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Eddy
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2010-03-06
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
1038-1043
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W1967470019
Cited by
162
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50hl073994-05)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50 HL-073994, P50 HL73994, K24HL088551)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
manual muscle testing, inter-rater reliability, intensive care unit survivors, standardized patients, critical illness, muscle strength assessment, quality assurance
MeSH terms
Humans, Intensive Care Units, Physical Examination, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Observer Variation, Patient Simulation, Survivors, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review