Cited by 83Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentAbdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsNosocomial Infections in ICU

Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding in adult ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

the GUIDE Group, Granholm, Anders, Zeng, Linan, Dionne, Joanna Colleen, Perner, Anders, Marker, Søren, Krag, Mette, MacLaren, Robert +3 more·2019·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To systematically identify predictors of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies including trial cohorts. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and trial registries up to March 2019. Eligible studies assessed potential predictors of clinically important GI bleeding (CIB; primary outcome) or overt GI bleeding (secondary outcome), had > 20 events, and presented adjusted effect estimates. Two reviewers assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. We meta-analysed adjusted effect estimates if data from ≥ 2 studies were available.Results We included 8 studies (116,497 patients). 4 studies (including 74,456 patients) assessed potential predictors of CIB, and we meta-analysed 12 potential predictors from these. Acute kidney injury (relative effect [RE] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-5.28, moderate certainty) and male gender (RE 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.50, low certainty) were associated with increased incidence of CIB. After excluding high risk of bias studies, coagulopathy (RE 4.76, 95% CI 2.62-8.63, moderate certainty), shock (RE 2.60, 95% CI 1.25-5.42, low certainty), and chronic liver disease (RE 7.64, 95% CI 3.32-17.58, moderate certainty) were associated with increased incidence of CIB. The effect of mechanical ventilation on CIB was unclear (RE 1.93, 0.57-6.50, very low certainty).Conclusions We identified predictors of CIB and overt GI bleeding in adult ICU patients. These findings may be used to identify ICU patients at higher risk of GI bleeding who are most likely to benefit from stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-019-05751-6

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
the GUIDE Group, Granholm, A., Zeng, L., Dionne, J. C., Perner, A., Marker, S., Krag, M., MacLaren, R., Ye, Z., Møller, M. H., & Alhazzani, W.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Centre for Research in Intensive Care (DK)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Møller, Morten Hylander
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2019-09-05
Volume
45
Issue
10
Pages
1347-1359
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2971511686
Cited by
83
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
The Guidelines in Intensive Care, Development and Evaluation (GUIDE) Group
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
gastrointestinal bleeding, intensive care unit patients, risk factors, acute kidney injury, coagulopathy, shock, chronic liver disease, mechanical ventilation, stress ulcer prophylaxis, critically ill adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Stomach Ulcer, Causality, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review