Cited by 1,010Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentNosocomial Infections in ICUAbdominal vascular conditions and treatments

Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Patients

Open access
Cook, Deborah J., Fuller, Hugh D., Guyatt, Gordon H., Marshall, John C., Leasa, David, Hall, Richard, Winton, Timothy L., Rutledge, Frank +5 more·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of prophylaxis against stress ulcers in preventing gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients has led to its widespread use. The side effects and cost of prophylaxis, however, necessitate targeting preventive therapy to those patients most likely to benefit. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study in which we evaluated potential risk factors for stress ulceration in patients admitted to intensive care units and documented the occurrence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (defined as overt bleeding in association with hemodynamic compromise or the need for blood transfusion). RESULTS: Of 2252 patients, 33 (1.5 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.1 percent) had clinically important bleeding. Two strong independent risk factors for bleeding were identified: respiratory failure (odds ratio, 15.6) and coagulopathy (odds ratio, 4.3). Of 847 patients who had one or both of these risk factors, 31 (3.7 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.5 to 5.2 percent) had clinically important bleeding. Of 1405 patients without these risk factors, 2 (0.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.5 percent) had clinically important bleeding. The mortality rate was 48.5 percent in the group with bleeding and 9.1 percent in the group without bleeding (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Few critically ill patients have clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding, and therefore prophylaxis against stress ulcers can be safely withheld from critically ill patients unless they have coagulopathy or require mechanical ventilation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199402103300601

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]3. Zinner MJ, Zuidema GD, Smith PL, Mignosa M. The prevention of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in patients in an intensive care unit. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:214-20.
  2. [15]15. Laggner AN, Lenz K, Graninger W, et al. Streβbluntungsprophylaxe auf einer internen Intensivstation: Sucralfat versus Ranitidin. Anaesthesist 1988;37:704-10.
  3. [31]31. La uit ss t t i et measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 1988;318:172833.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, D. J., Fuller, H. D., Guyatt, G. H., Marshall, J. C., Leasa, D., Hall, R., Winton, T. L., Rutledge, F., Todd, T., Roy, P., Lacroix, J., Griffith, L., & Willan, A.
Affiliations
  • Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-02-10
Volume
330
Issue
6
Pages
377-381
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2319207481
Cited by
1,010
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 34
FWCI
32.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Keywords
gastrointestinal bleeding, stress ulcer prophylaxis, critically ill patients, intensive care unit, risk factors, respiratory failure, coagulopathy, mechanical ventilation, mortality, blood transfusion
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Ulcer Agents, Female, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptic Ulcer, Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Stress, Physiological, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review