Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients

Open access
Azoulay, Elie, Russell, Lene, Van de Louw, Andry, Metaxa, Victoria, Bauer, Philippe, Povoa, Pedro, Montero, José Garnacho, Loeches, Ignacio Martin, Mehta, Sangeeta, Puxty, Kathryn, Schellongowski, Peter, Rello, Jordi, Mokart, Djamel, Lemiale, Virginie, Mirouse, Adrien, the Nine-i Investigators·2020·Intensive Care Medicine
DOI 10.1007/s00134-019-05906-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An increasing number of critically ill patients are immunocompromised. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF), chiefly due to pulmonary infection, is the leading reason for ICU admission. Identifying the cause of ARF increases the chances of survival, but may be extremely challenging, as the underlying disease, treatments, and infection combine to create complex clinical pictures. In addition, there may be more than one infectious agent, and the pulmonary manifestations may be related to both infectious and non-infectious insults. Clinically or microbiologically documented bacterial pneumonia accounts for one-third of cases of ARF in immunocompromised patients. Early antibiotic therapy is recommended but decreases the chances of identifying the causative organism(s) to about 50%. Viruses are the second most common cause of severe respiratory infections. Positive tests for a virus in respiratory samples do not necessarily indicate a role for the virus in the current acute illness. Invasive fungal infections ( Aspergillus , Mucorales , and Pneumocystis jirovecii ) account for about 15% of severe respiratory infections, whereas parasites rarely cause severe acute infections in immunocompromised patients. This review focuses on the diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients. Special attention is given to newly validated diagnostic tests designed to be used on non-invasive samples or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and capable of increasing the likelihood of an early etiological diagnosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-019-05906-5

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Azoulay, E., Russell, L., Van de Louw, A., Metaxa, V., Bauer, P., Povoa, P., Montero, J. G., Loeches, I. M., Mehta, S., Puxty, K., Schellongowski, P., Rello, J., Mokart, D., Lemiale, V., Mirouse, A., & the Nine-i Investigators
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-02
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
298-314
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
DOI
10.1007/s00134-019-05906-5
OpenAlex
W3004917317
Cited by
346
References
93
FWCI
19.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.