Cited by 380Disaster Response and ManagementCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 142 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: Rapid guidelines.

Open access

Abstract

Given the rapidly changing nature of COVID-19, clinicians and policy makers require urgent review and summary of the literature, and synthesis of evidence-based guidelines to inform practice. The WHO advocates for rapid reviews in these circumstances. The purpose of this rapid guideline is to provide recommendations on the organizational management of intensive care units caring for patients with COVID-19 including: planning a crisis surge response; crisis surge response strategies; triage, supporting families, and staff.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-020-06092-5

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 138 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE, Alliance for Health Policy Systems Research WHO (2017) Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. World Health Organization, Geneva
  2. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B (2020) Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. China. Lancet 395(10223):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tronstad C, Martinsen T, Olsen M, Rosseland L, Pettersen F, Martinsen Ø, Høgetveit J, Kalvøy H (2020) Splitting one ventilator for multiple patients—a technical assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:200312349
  4. American Association for Respiratory Care (2020) Joint statement on multiple patients per ventilator. https://www.aarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/032620-COVID-19-press-release.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–379 of 379

Metadata

Authors
Aziz, S., Arabi, Y. M., Alhazzani, W., Evans, L., Citerio, G., Fischkoff, K., Salluh, J., Meyfroidt, G., Alshamsi, F., Oczkowski, S., Azoulay, E., Price, A., Burry, L., Dzierba, A., Benintende, A., Morgan, J., Grasselli, G., Rhodes, A., Møller, M. H., Chu, L., Schwedhelm, S., Lowe, J. J., Bin, D., & Christian, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • D’Or Institute for Research and Education (BR)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • United Arab Emirates University (AE)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • St George's Hospital (GB)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Christian, Michael D.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
46
Issue
7
Pages
1303-1325
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W3034038345
Cited by
380
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 49
FWCI
74.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care unit, crisis management, triage, family support, healthcare workers, organizational management, rapid review
MeSH terms
Personal Protective Equipment, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Critical Care, Equipment and Supplies, Hospital, Health Workforce, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Pneumonia, Viral, Respiration, Artificial, Triage, Health Care Rationing, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review