The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frodo: Take off the Ring! Practical, Quantum-Secure Key Exchange from LWE
Open accessAbstract
Lattice-based cryptography offers some of the most attractive primitives believed to be resistant to quantum computers. Following increasing interest from both companies and government agencies in building quantum computers, a number of works have proposed instantiations of practical post-quantum key exchange protocols based on hard problems in ideal lattices, mainly based on the Ring Learning With Errors (R-LWE) problem. While ideal lattices facilitate major efficiency and storage benefits over their non-ideal counterparts, the additional ring structure that enables these advantages also raises concerns about the assumed difficulty of the underlying problems. Thus, a question of significant interest to cryptographers, and especially to those currently placing bets on primitives that will withstand quantum adversaries, is how much of an advantage the additional ring structure actually gives in practice. Despite conventional wisdom that generic lattices might be too slow and unwieldy, we demonstrate that LWE-based key exchange is quite practical: our constant time implementation requires around 1.3ms computation time for each party; compared to the recent NewHope R-LWE scheme, communication sizes increase by a factor of 4.7x, but remain under 12 KiB in each direction. Our protocol is competitive when used for serving web pages over TLS; when partnered with ECDSA signatures, latencies increase by less than a factor of 1.6x, and (even under heavy load) server throughput only decreases by factors of 1.5x and 1.2x when serving typical 1 KiB and 100 KiB pages, respectively. To achieve these practical results, our protocol takes advantage of several innovations. These include techniques to optimize communication bandwidth, dynamic generation of public parameters (which also offers additional security against backdoors), carefully chosen error distributions, and tight security parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search
Grover, L. K. (1996) · Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96 · doi:10.1145/237814.237866 · Cited by 8,830
Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795293172 · Cited by 8,472
Gaussian elimination is not optimal
Strassen, V. (1969) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf02165411 · Cited by 2,509
Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions
Gentry, C., Peikert, C., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2008) · Proceedings of the fortieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1374376.1374407 · Cited by 2,435
On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography
Regev, O. (2009) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1568318.1568324 · Cited by 2,315
On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography
Regev, O. (2005) · Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1060590.1060603 · Cited by 2,313
Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook
Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231930 · Cited by 2,114
NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J., & Silverman, J. H. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054868 · Cited by 1,947
Efficient Fully Homomorphic Encryption from (Standard) LWE
Brakerski, Z., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2011) · 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/focs.2011.12 · Cited by 1,449
Generating hard instances of lattice problems (extended abstract)
Ajtai, M. (1996) · Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96 · doi:10.1145/237814.237838 · Cited by 1,405
Cited by
CRYSTALS - Kyber: A CCA-Secure Module-Lattice-Based KEM
Bos, J., Ducas, L., Kiltz, E., Lepoint, T., Lyubashevsky, V., Schanck, J. M., Schwabe, P., Seiler, G., & Stehle, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2018.00032 · Cited by 1,192
Self-citationFernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2968985 · Cited by 607
A Modular Analysis of the Fujisaki-Okamoto Transformation
Hofheinz, D., Hövelmanns, K., & Kiltz, E. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70500-2_12 · Cited by 451
Status report on the third round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization process
Alagic, G., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., Kelsey, J., Lichtinger, J., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., Moody, D., et al. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8413-upd1 · Cited by 301
Post-Quantum Era Privacy Protection for Intelligent Infrastructures
Malina, L., Dzurenda, P., Ricci, S., Hajny, J., Srivastava, G., Matulevicius, R., Affia, A.-A. O., Laurent, M., Sultan, N. H., & Tang, Q. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3062201 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Bos, J., Costello, C., Ducas, L., Mironov, I., Naehrig, M., Nikolaenko, V., Raghunathan, A., & Stebila, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-10-24
- Pages
- 1006-1018
- OpenAlex
- W2514893051
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 21.42
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frodo: Take off the Ring! Practical, Quantum-Secure Key Exchange from LWE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2976749.2978425
- The paper
- Bos, J., Costello, C., Ducas, L., Mironov, I., Naehrig, M., Nikolaenko, V., Raghunathan, A., & Stebila, D. (2016). Frodo: Take off the Ring! Practical, Quantum-Secure Key Exchange from LWE. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.