Cited by 131Ethics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Digitalization, Law, and Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial intelligence and the value of transparency

Walmsley, Joel·2021·AI & SOCIETY

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-020-01066-z

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hempel C (1965) “The Function of General Laws in History” in his aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. Free Press, New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–131 of 131

Metadata

Authors
Walmsley, J.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Walmsley, Joel
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2020-09-08
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
585-595
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W3084135104
Cited by
131
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
machine learning, big data, epistemology of AI, AI ethics, contestability, accountability, explainability, algorithmic decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review