Cited by 994Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy and History of ScienceCybernetics and Technology in Society

Intentional Systems

Dennett, D. C., The Journal of Philosophy, Inc.·1971·Journal of Philosophy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2025382

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge of higher-level regularities does not presuppose knowledge of the finer details of the system.

    “It is well-received in both the philosophical and the computer science literature that knowledge of such higher-level regularities does not presuppose knowledge of the finer details of the system”

    From AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy (2022) · cites this paper as Dennett, 1971

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dennett, D. C., & The Journal of Philosophy, I.
Corresponding author
Dennett, D. C.
Venue
Journal of Philosophy
Published
1971
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
87-106
ISSN
0022-362X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4252582630
Cited by
994
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
intentional systems, intentionality, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review