The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Working from home and income inequality: risks of a ‘new normal’ with COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
In the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, working from home (WFH) became of great importance for a large share of employees since it represents the only option to both continue working and minimise the risk of virus exposure. Uncertainty about the duration of the pandemic and future contagion waves even led companies to view WFH as a ‘new normal’ way of working. Based on influence function regression methods, this paper explores the potential consequences in the labour income distribution related to a long-lasting increase in WFH feasibility among Italian employees. Results show that a positive shift in WFH feasibility would be associated with an increase in average labour income, but this potential benefit would not be equally distributed among employees. Specifically, an increase in the opportunity to WFH would favour male, older, high-educated, and high-paid employees. However, this ‘forced innovation’ would benefit more employees living in provinces have been more affected by the novel coronavirus. WFH thus risks exacerbating pre-existing inequalities in the labour market, especially if it will not be adequately regulated. As a consequence, this study suggests that policies aimed at alleviating inequality, like income support measures (in the short run) and human capital interventions (in the long run), should play a more important compensating role in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913643 · Cited by 13,316
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach
DiNardo, J., Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (1996) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171954 · Cited by 2,903
The Influence Curve and its Role in Robust Estimation
Hampel, F. R. (1974) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10482962 · Cited by 2,706
A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter
Goldin, C. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.4.1091 · Cited by 2,611
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8337 · Cited by 2,587
Unconditional Quantile Regressions
(2009) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta6822 · Cited by 2,226
Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring
Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.8.2509 · Cited by 2,111 · cited 2×
“To be noted, the existing literature on automation (Goos et al. 2014) and recent contributions on WFH in Italy (Boeri et al.”
BackgroundDoes Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment *
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju032 · Cited by 1,991
Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market?
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555874 · Cited by 1,830
Cited by
Soft skills and their importance in the labour market under the conditions of Industry 5.0
Poláková, M., Suleimanová, J. H., Madzík, P., Copuš, L., Molnárová, I., & Polednová, J. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18670 · Cited by 346
Impacts of COVID-19 on clinical research in the UK: a multi-method qualitative case study
Wyatt, D., Faulkner-Gurstein, R., Cowan, H., & Wolfe, C. D. A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256871 · Cited by 35
Working from home, commuting, and gender
Nagler, M., Rincke, J., & Winkler, E. (2024) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-024-01035-6 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonacini, L., Gallo, G., & Scicchitano, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Population Economics
- Published
- 2020-09-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 303-360
- ISSN
- 0933-1433 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1475
- OpenAlex
- W3084503872
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 66.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Working from home and income inequality: risks of a ‘new normal’ with COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00148-020-00800-7
- The paper
- Bonacini, L., Gallo, G., & Scicchitano, S. (2021). Working from home and income inequality: risks of a ‘new normal’ with COVID-19. Journal of Population Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00800-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.