Cited by 1,830Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityGlobal trade and economicsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market?

Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., Krueger, A. B.·1998·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of skill-biased technological change as measured by computerization on the recent widening of U. S. educational wage differentials. An analysis of aggregate changes in the relative supplies and wages of workers by education from 1940 to 1996 indicates strong and persistent growth in relative demand favoring college graduates. Rapid skill upgrading within detailed industries accounts for most of the growth in the relative demand for college workers, particularly since 1970. Analyses of four data sets indicate that the rate of skill upgrading has been greater in more computer-intensive industries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355398555874

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Income distribution becomes dependent on changes in the skill composition of workers and the skill-biased nature of technological progress.

    “Therefore, the income distribution becomes dependent on the changes in the skill composition of workers and skill-biased nature of technological progress (see, for instance, Berman et al., 1994;Autor et al., 1998;Piva and Vivarelli, 2004;Acemoglu and Autor, 2011).”

    From Financialization and the Labor Share of Income (2019) · cites this paper as Autor et al., 1998

  • Some technologies, like personal computers, have been complementary mostly to educated workers.

    “Some of these technologies, like personal computers, have been complementary mostly to educated workers (63, 64)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1998-11-01
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
1169-1213
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2117735259
Cited by
1,830
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 46
FWCI
103.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
skill-biased technological change, computerization, university graduates, skill upgrading, labor market, wage inequality, educational attainment and wages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review