The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of dust by massive stars at high redshift
Open accessAbstract
The large amounts of dust detected in sub-millimeter galaxies and quasars at high redshift pose a challenge to galaxy formation models and theories of cosmic dust formation. At z>6 only stars of relatively high mass (>3 M⊙) are sufficiently short-lived to be potential stellar sources of dust. This review is devoted to identifying and quantifying the most important stellar channels of rapid dust formation. We ascertain the dust production efficiency of stars in the mass range 3–40 M⊙ using both observed and theoretical dust yields of evolved massive stars and supernovae (SNe) and provide analytical expressions for the dust production efficiencies in various scenarios. We also address the strong sensitivity of the total dust productivity to the initial mass function. From simple considerations, we find that, in the early Universe, high-mass (>3 M⊙) asymptotic giant branch stars can only be dominant dust producers if SNe generate ≲3×10−3 M⊙ of dust whereas SNe prevail if they are more efficient. We address the challenges in inferring dust masses and star-formation rates from observations of high-redshift galaxies. We conclude that significant SN dust production at high redshift is likely required to reproduce current dust mass estimates, possibly coupled with rapid dust grain growth in the interstellar medium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
The Discovery and Analysis of Very Metal-Poor Stars in the Galaxy
Beers, T. C., & Christlieb, N. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134057 · Cited by 1,223
Stellar Models and Yields of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Karakas, A., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2007) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as07021 · Cited by 312
Metal-rich carbon stars in the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy
Lagadec, E., Zijlstra, A. A., Sloan, G. C., Wood, P. R., Matsuura, M., Bernard-Salas, J., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Cioni, M.-R. L., Feast, M. W., Groenewegen, M. A. T., et al. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14736.x · Cited by 23
Cited by
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
THE DUST ATTENUATION LAW IN DISTANT GALAXIES: EVIDENCE FOR VARIATION WITH SPECTRAL TYPE
Kriek, M., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/l16 · Cited by 386
The star formation rate density and dust attenuation evolution over 12 Gyr with the VVDS surveys
Cucciati, O., Tresse, L., Ilbert, O., Le Fèvre, O., Garilli, B., Le Brun, V., Cassata, P., Franzetti, P., Maccagni, D., Scodeggio, M., et al. (2012) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118010 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Gall, C., Hjorth, J., & Andersen, A. C.
- Venue
- The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
- Published
- 2011-09-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0935-4956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0754
- OpenAlex
- W2093840793
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production of dust by massive stars at high redshift. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00159-011-0043-7
- The paper
- Gall, C., Hjorth, J., & Andersen, A. C. (2011). Production of dust by massive stars at high redshift. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-011-0043-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.