The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding regional variation in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe
Open accessAbstract
Differences in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude are substantial and persistent across nations and regions. However, studies on entrepreneurship that encompass regions and countries at the same time are lacking. This paper explains both national and regional differences in entrepreneurial attitude and activity for 127 regions in 17 European countries, based on Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) data. We reveal the importance of institutional factors and economic and demographic attributes to variations in regional entrepreneurial attitude and activity. Our findings point at the relevance of distinguishing between components of entrepreneurial attitudes, i.e. fear of failure in starting business, perceptions on start-up opportunities and self-assessment of personal capabilities to start a firm. We find different determinants of these components, suggesting that they reflect different aspects of entrepreneurial attitude. In explaining regional prevalence rates of phases in entrepreneurial activity (nascent, baby business, established business) we find significant contributions of entrepreneurial attitude components. Urban regions and regions with high levels of nearby start-up examples show relatively high rates of early-stage entrepreneurship. A large number of start-up procedures does not discourage early-stage entrepreneurship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
La Porta, R. (1999) · Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/15.1.222 · Cited by 5,699
The Effect of Business Regulations on Nascent and Young Business Entrepreneurship
van Stel, A., Storey, D. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2007) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-006-9014-1 · Cited by 813 · cited 1×
“This means that the number of national start-up regulations does not discourage nascent entrepreneurship—in contrast with the findings of Van Stel et al. (2007), who perform an empirical analysis on a larger and more heterogeneous set of countries (but do not consider the regional dimension)—but does hamper actually o…”
ResultLatent entrepreneurship across nations
Blanchflower, D. G., Oswald, A., & Stutzer, A. (2001) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00137-4 · Cited by 674
Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some Recent Developments
Grilo, I., & Thurik, R. (2005) · The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-005-4772-9 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Institutional and economic drivers of entrepreneurship: An international perspective
Simón-Moya, V., Revuelto-Taboada, L., & Guerrero, R. F. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.033 · Cited by 191
Entrepreneurship and geography—some thoughts about a complex relationship
Sternberg, R. (2022) · The Annals of Regional Science · doi:10.1007/s00168-021-01091-w · Cited by 69
Tubadji, A., Nijkamp, P., & Angelis, V. (2016) · Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsv035 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Bosma, N., & Schutjens, V.
- Venue
- The Annals of Regional Science
- Published
- 2010-05-21
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 711-742
- ISSN
- 0570-1864 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0592
- OpenAlex
- W1980628724
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.