Cited by 26Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisManufacturing Process and Optimization

Surfel convolutional neural network for support detection in additive manufacturing

Huang, Jida, Kwok, Tsz-Ho, Zhou, Chi, Xu, Wenyao·2019·The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00170-019-03792-1

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A machine learning model can be developed that enables designs for which a minimum amount of support is required.

    “A machine learning model can be developed that enables designs for which a minimum amount of support is required [426].”

    From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [426]

    The Support learning pipeline (p. 4) proposes a deep-learning model to detect where an existing design needs support, addressing redundant supports. But Support generation (p. 3) says this work focuses on detecting support regions, and the Conclusions (p. 11) place deep-learning-based support structure generation in future work. The paper does not establish that the model enables designs requiring a minimum amount of support. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Boscaini D, Masci J, Rodoi` a E, Bronstein M (2016) Learning shape correspondence with anisotropic convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on neural information processing systems, Curran Associates Inc., USA, NIPS'16, pp 3197-3205
  2. [31]31. Wang CC, Chen Y (2008) Layered depth-normal images for complex geometries: part two-manifold-preserved adaptive contouring. In: ASME 2008 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 729-739

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, J., Kwok, T.-H., Zhou, C., & Xu, W.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Concordia University (CA)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Chi
Venue
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published
2019-05-06
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pages
3593-3604
ISSN
  • 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3015
OpenAlex
W2944050272
Cited by
26
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Computer and Network Systems (1547167)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2017-06707)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Keywords
support detection, support structure generation, 3D printing, surfels, overhang structures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review