The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Propensity score matching and variations on the balancing test
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?
A. Smith, J., & E. Todd, P. (2005) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · Cited by 3,176
Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2999630 · Cited by 2,286
Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation
Rubin, D. B. (2001) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1023/a:1020363010465 · Cited by 2,228
The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies
Cochran, W. G. (1968) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528036 · Cited by 961
Permutation, Parametric and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses
(2005) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b138696 · Cited by 707
Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials
Senn, S. (1994) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780131703 · Cited by 503
New evidence on the finite sample properties of propensity score reweighting and matching estimators
Busso, M., DiNardo, J., & McCrary, J. (2014) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00431 · Cited by 428
Covariate Balance in Simple, Stratified and Clustered Comparative Studies
Hansen, B. B., & Bowers, J. (2008) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/08-sts254 · Cited by 414
Zhao, Z. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323023705 · Cited by 389
Inverse probability tilting for moment condition models with missing data
Graham, B. S., De Xavier Pinto, C. C., & Egel, D. (2012) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdr047 · Cited by 174 · cited 1×
“In related study, Graham et al. (2008) propose a flexible parametric variant of inverse probability weighting which they call “inverse probability tilting”.”
Cited by
Non-farm work and food security among farm households in Northern Ghana
Owusu, V., Abdulai, A., & Abdul-Rahman, S. (2011) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.09.002 · Cited by 317
Abid, M., Schneider, U. A., & Scheffran, J. (2016) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.08.005 · Cited by 296
Ogutu, S. O., Okello, J. J., & Otieno, D. J. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.011 · Cited by 262
Additionality in U.S. Agricultural Conservation Programs
Claassen, R., Duquette, E. N., & Smith, D. J. (2018) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.94.1.19 · Cited by 73
Specification tests for the propensity score
Sant’Anna, P. H. C., & Song, X. (2019) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.02.002 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, W.-S.
- Venue
- Empirical Economics
- Published
- 2011-05-27
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-80
- ISSN
- 0377-7332 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-8921
- OpenAlex
- W1987801070
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Propensity score matching and variations on the balancing test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00181-011-0481-0
- The paper
- Lee, W.-S. (2013). Propensity score matching and variations on the balancing test. Empirical Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0481-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
