The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inflation and growth: new evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Cited by
Does too much finance harm economic growth?
Law, S. H., & Singh, N. (2014) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.020 · Cited by 789
Dynamic panels with threshold effect and endogeneity
Seo, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2016) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.005 · Cited by 698
Samargandi, N., Fidrmuc, J., & Ghosh, S. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.010 · Cited by 647
Financial development and innovation-led growth: Is too much finance better?
Zhu, X., Asimakopoulos, S., & Kim, J. (2020) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102083 · Cited by 173
Financial development, institutional investors, and economic growth
Ruiz, J. L. (2018) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2017.08.009 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Kremer, S., Bick, A., & Nautz, D.
- Venue
- Empirical Economics
- Published
- 2012-03-14
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 861-878
- ISSN
- 0377-7332 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-8921
- OpenAlex
- W2104615763
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.