Cited by 69Geophysics and Gravity MeasurementsGNSS positioning and interferenceGeodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures

Confirming regional 1 cm differential geoid accuracy from airborne gravimetry: the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011

Smith, Dru A., Holmes, Simon A., Li, Xiaopeng, Guillaume, Sébastien, Wang, Yan Ming, Bürki, Beat, Roman, Daniel R., Damiani, Theresa M.·2013·Journal of Geodesy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00190-013-0653-0

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Geometric levelling is susceptible to systematic errors; examples include differences of about 0.2 m over 1000 km in Great Britain, 0.25 m over 900 km in France, and >±1 m across Canada and USA.

    “Consequently, it is important to keep in mind that geometric levelling is a differential technique and hence may be susceptible to systematic errors; examples include the differences between the second and third geodetic levelling in Great Britain (about 0 . 2 m in the north-south direction over about 1000 km distance [154]), corresponding differences between an old and new levelling in France (”

    From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [158]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, D. A., Holmes, S. A., Li, X., Guillaume, S., Wang, Y. M., Bürki, B., Roman, D. R., & Damiani, T. M.
Affiliations
  • NOAA National Geodetic Survey (US)
  • Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies (United States) (US)
  • Earth Resources Technology (United States) (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Smith, Dru A.
Venue
Journal of Geodesy
Published
2013-09-08
Volume
87
Issue
10-12
Pages
885-907
ISSN
  • 0949-7714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1394
OpenAlex
W2086917859
Cited by
67
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geodesy (publishedVersion)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
Keywords
geoid accuracy, airborne gravimetry, vertical deflection, orthometric height, spirit leveling, surface gravity, southern Texas, grace, GOCE, digital elevation model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review