Cited by 51Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchSexual function and dysfunction studies

Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function

Ghetti, Chiara, Gregory, W. Thomas, Edwards, S. Renee, Otto, Lesley N., Clark, Amanda L.·2005·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that clinical measurements of the superficial perineum and of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function correlate with the severity of pelvic organ prolapse. This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed 1037 women in an academic urogynecologic practice. Greatest descent of prolapse, by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, was correlated with two assessments of levator function--the Oxford grading scale and levator hiatus (LH) size measured by digital examination. Correlations were calculated using Pearson's correlation for continuous variables and Kendall's tau-b. Severity of prolapse correlated moderately with genital hiatus (GH) (r = 0.5, p<0.0001) and with LH (transverse r = 0.4, p < 0.0001; longitudinal r = 0.5, p < 0.0001), but weakly with the Oxford grading scale (r = -0.16, p < 0.0001). LH correlated with GH (r = 0.5, p < 0.0001) but not with perineal body (r = 0.06, p = 0.06). Both GH and LH size are associated with the severity of prolapse. LH size correlates more strongly to prolapse severity than assessment of PFM function by the Oxford grading scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-004-1274-1

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghetti, C., Gregory, W. T., Edwards, S. R., Otto, L. N., & Clark, A. L.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Ghetti, Chiara
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2005-01-20
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
432-436
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W1964668736
Cited by
51
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD-0143)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse severity, pelvic floor muscle function, levator hiatus, genital hiatus, perineal body, POP-Q
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Perineum, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Uterine Prolapse, Pelvic Floor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review