Cited by 33Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Investigating the association of the dimensions of genital hiatus and levator hiatus with pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review

Siahkal, Shahla Faal, Iravani, Mina, Mohaghegh, Zeynab, Sharifipour, Foruzan, Zahedian, Maryam, Nasab, Maryam Beheshti·2021·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Background and hypothesis Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very common and distressing problem that affects women's quality of life. This systematic review aimed to investigate the association of the dimensions of the genital hiatus and levator hiatus at rest and Valsalva with POP.Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science were searched on 25 April 2020. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.Results Of the 1288 papers reviewed, 21 (n = 5145: 2909 women with POP and 2236 controls) were considered for meta-analysis. Compared with the normal pelvic floor group, the urogenital hiatus size in the POP group was significantly higher at rest (mean difference: 0.49; 95% CI: [0.43, 0.55], P < 0.00001) and at Valsalva (mean difference: 0.79; 95% CI: [0.70, 0.89], P < 0.00001). Also, the levator ani hiatus size in the POP group was significantly higher at rest (mean difference: 0.52, 95% CI: [0.25, 0.78], P < 0.0001) and at Valsalva (mean difference: 1.01; 95% CI: [0.73,1.28], P < 0.00001) compared with that in the normal pelvic floor group.Conclusion This systematic review showed that the sizes of the urogenital hiatus and levator ani hiatus and area of the levator hiatus in the POP group were significantly higher than those in the normal pelvic floor groups in both positions (rest or Valsalva maneuver). Also, in the POP group, the levator hiatus length at rest was significantly lower than that in the Valsalva maneuver.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-020-04639-0

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siahkal, S. F., Iravani, M., Mohaghegh, Z., Sharifipour, F., Zahedian, M., & Nasab, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
  • Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Iravani, Mina
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
2095-2109
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W3126535255
Cited by
33
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, genital hiatus, levator hiatus, levator ani muscle, urogenital hiatus, pelvic floor, Valsalva maneuver, women's health
MeSH terms
Female, Genitalia, Humans, Quality of Life, Ultrasonography, Valsalva Maneuver, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review