Cited by 32Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchSexual function and dysfunction studies

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20

Yoshida, Mikako, Murayama, Ryoko, Ota, Erika, Nakata, Maki, Kozuma, Shiro, Homma, Yukio·2013·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study was to translate the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 (PFDI-20) into Japanese and test its reliability and validity among Japanese women.Methods Fifty-nine women with and without pelvic floor disorders (age 55.8 ± 16.8 years, mean ± SD) completed the Japanese PFDI-20 (J-PFDI-20) questionnaire at baseline and 2 weeks later. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method for test-retest reliability and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency of the J-PFDI-20 were used. Scores of total and subscales were compared between women with and without pelvic floor disorders for known-groups validity. Spearman's correlation coefficients between the J-PFDI-20 and the severity of pelvic floor disorders and Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (I-QOL) were used for construct validity.Results The PFDI-20 was successfully translated from English into Japanese with face validity through rigorous cross-cultural validation. Test-retest reliability of the J-PFDI-20 and three subscales was good to excellent (ICC=0.77-0.90). The Bland and Altman analysis showed that differences between the first and second scores of total J-PFDI-20 and its subscales were not significantly different from 0 and largely fell within the range of 0 ± 1.96 SD. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.52-0.83. Analysis of known-groups validity showed differences in scores of the J-PFDI-20 between women with and without pelvic floor disorders. Acceptable construct validity was found in J-PFDI-20 total and subscale scores with positive correlations to severity of pelvic floor disorders (ρ>0.35) and negative correlations to I-QOL (ρ<-0.39).Conclusions The results suggest that the J-PFDI-20 is a reliable and valid condition-specific quality of life instrument for women with pelvic floor disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-012-1962-1

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoshida, M., Murayama, R., Ota, E., Nakata, M., Kozuma, S., & Homma, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Tokyo Hospital (JP)
  • Mitsui Memorial Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Yoshida, Mikako
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2012-10-19
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1039-1046
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2126468883
Cited by
32
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
Japanese translation, cross-cultural validation, pelvic floor dysfunction, quality of life, test-retest reliability, construct validity, urinary incontinence, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Culture, Fecal Incontinence, Female, Humans, Language, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translating, Urinary Incontinence, Reproducibility of Results, Asian People, Pelvic Floor Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review