Cited by 429Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchSexual function and dysfunction studies

An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction

Open access
Bo, Kari, Frawley, Helena C., Haylen, Bernard T., Abramov, Yoram, Almeida, Fernando G., Berghmans, Bary, Bortolini, Maria, Dumoulin, Chantale +7 more·2017·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesisThere has been an increasing need for the terminology on the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction to be collated in a clinically based consensus report.MethodsThis Report combines the input of members and elected nominees of the Standardization and Terminology Committees of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS), assisted at intervals by many external referees. An extensive process of nine rounds of internal and external review was developed to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus). Before opening up for comments on the webpages of ICS and IUGA, five experts from physiotherapy, neurology, urology, urogynecology, and nursing were invited to comment on the paper.ResultsA Terminology Report on the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction, encompassing over 200 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically based, with the most common symptoms, signs, assessments, diagnoses, and treatments defined. Clarity and ease of use have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction. Ongoing review is not only anticipated, but will be required to keep the document updated and as widely acceptable as possible.ConclusionA consensus-based terminology report for the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction has been produced, aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and a stimulus for research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-016-3123-4

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 150 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bo, K., Frawley, H. C., Haylen, B. T., Abramov, Y., Almeida, F. G., Berghmans, B., Bortolini, M., Dumoulin, C., Gomes, M., McClurg, D., Meijlink, J., Shelly, E., Trabuco, E., Walker, C., & Wells, A.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid (ES)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2016-12-05
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
191-213
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2558401829
Cited by
429
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 13 · 2014: 1
FWCI
25.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • University of Southampton
  • Univerza v Ljubljani
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
female pelvic floor dysfunction, terminology standardization, conservative treatment, non-pharmacological treatment, pelvic floor physiotherapy, urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse
MeSH terms
Conservative Treatment, Diagnostic Imaging, Female, Gynecology, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Societies, Medical, Urinary Incontinence, Urodynamics, Urology, Pelvic Pain, Pelvic Floor, Gynecological Examination, Pelvic Floor Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review