Cited by 39Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsHernia repair and management

Factors influencing the outcome of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Open access
Bohlin, Katja Stenström, Ankardal, Maud, Nüssler, Emil, Lindkvist, Håkan, Milsom, Ian·2018·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery is a common gynecological procedure. Our aim was to assess the influence of obesity and other risk factors on the outcome of anterior and posterior colporrhaphy with and without mesh. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery on 18,554 women undergoing primary and repeat POP surgery without concomitant urinary incontinence (UI) surgery between 2006 and 2015. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for a sensation of a vaginal bulge, de novo UI, and residual UI 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The overall subjective cure rate 1 year after surgery was 80% (with mesh 86.4% vs 77.3% without mesh, p < 0.001). The complication rate was low, but was more frequent in repeat surgery that were mainly mesh related. The use of mesh was also associated with more frequent de novo UI, but patient satisfaction and cure rates were higher compared with surgery without mesh. Preoperative sensation of a vaginal bulge, severe postoperative complications, anterior colporrhaphy, prior hysterectomy, postoperative infections, local anesthesia, and body mass index (BMI) ≥30 were risk factors for sensation of a vaginal bulge 1 year postsurgery. Obesity had no effect on complication rates but was associated increased urinary incontinence (UI) after primary surgery. Obesity had no influence on cure or voiding status in women undergoing repeat surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity had an impact on the sensation of a vaginal bulge and the presence of UI after primary surgery but not on complications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-017-3446-9

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Maher C BK, Barber M, Cheon C, Deitz V, De Tayrac R, Gutman R, Sentilhes L, Karram M. (2013) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery. 5th edition edn.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohlin, K. S., Ankardal, M., Nüssler, E., Lindkvist, H., & Milsom, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Hallands sjukhus Halmstad (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Bohlin, Katja Stenström
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2017-09-11
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
81-89
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2756029689
Cited by
39
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National LUA/ALF grant (11315)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, obesity, body mass index, anterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy, mesh augmentation, urinary incontinence, surgical complications, risk factors, cure rate, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Reoperation, Risk Factors, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Surgical Mesh, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Vaginal Diseases, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review