Cited by 21Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsPregnancy-related medical research

The effect of women’s body mass index on pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta analysis

Open access
Zenebe, Chernet Baye, Chanie, Wagaye Fentahun, Aregawi, Aster Berhe, Andargie, Tamiru Minwuye, Mihret, Muhabaw Shumye·2021·Reproductive Health

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse remains the public health challenge globally. Existing evidences report the effect of woman’s weight on the pelvic organ prolapse inconsistently and this urges the need of pooled body weight effect on the pelvic organ prolapse. Although there was a previous work on this regard, it included papers reported before June 18/2015. Thus, updated and comprehensive evidence in this aspect is essential to devise strategies for interventions. Objective: This review aimed at synthesizing evidence regarding the pooled effect of body weight on the pelvic organ prolapsed. Methods: For this review, we searched all available articles through databases including PubMed, Web of Sciences, CINAHL, JBI library, Cochran library, PsycInfo and EMBASE as well as grey literature including Mednar, worldwide science, PschEXTRA and Google scholar. We included cohort, case–control, cross-sectional and experimental studies which had been reported between March 30, 2005 to March 30, 2020. In the effect analysis, we utilized random model. The heterogeneity of the studies was determined by I2 statistic and the publication bias was checked by Egger’s regression test. Searching was limited to studies reported in the English language. Results: A total of 14 articles with 53,797 study participants were included in this systematic review (SR) and meta analysis (MA). The pooled result of this Meta analyses depict that body mass index (BMI) doesn’t have statistical significant association with pelvic organ prolapse. Conclusion: This review point out that women’s body mass index has no significant effect on the development of pelvic organ prolapse. However, the readers should interpret the result with cautions due to the presence of considerable limitations in this work. Trial registration The protocol of this systematic review (SR) and meta analysis (MA) has been registered in PROSPERO databases with the Registration number of CRD42020186951

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12978-021-01104-z

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subjective outcome measures may be confounded by spectrum bias.

    “Subjective outcome measures may be confounded by spectrum bias.52”

    From Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies differences between subjective and objective pelvic-organ-prolapse measures as a limitation, but does not say subjective measures may be confounded by spectrum bias. A search for “spectrum bias” found no passage addressing that specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zenebe, C. B., Chanie, W. F., Aregawi, A. B., Andargie, T. M., & Mihret, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Gondar (ET)
Corresponding author
Mihret, Muhabaw Shumye
Venue
Reproductive Health
Published
2021-02-19
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
45-45
ISSN
1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3131776017
Cited by
21
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, body mass index, obesity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review