Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis The surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is associated with specific complications. Our primary objective was to assess the recurrence requiring reoperation after prolapse surgery, and our secondary objectives were to assess the early complications and secondary surgery for urinary incontinence.Methods Retrospective study of a population-based cohort of all hospital or outpatient stays including POP surgery from 2008 to 2014, using the French nationwide discharge summary database. We calculated the rates of hospital readmission following surgery as well as the rates of reoperation for recurrent prolapse and subsequent procedures performed for urinary incontinence.Results A total of 310,938 patients had undergone surgery for POP. Two hundred fourteen (0.07%) patients died, and 0.45% were admitted to an intensive care unit; 4.4% of the patients underwent surgery for the recurrence of prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy in the first surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of POP surgery recurrence: (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.51 [0.49; 0.53]). A total of 1386 (2.5%) patients were readmitted to the hospital for early (30-day) complications of prolapse surgery. The most frequent reasons for early readmission were local infection (32.8%), hemorrhage (21.4%) and pain (17.2%). Risk factors for complications were obesity, hospitals with low levels of activity and associated incontinence surgery; 4.6% of the patients required secondary surgery for urinary incontinence; obesity was a risk factor (HR [95% CI] = 1.12 [1.01; 1.24]), and the vaginal route was a protective factor (odds ratio = 1.86 for laparoscopy, 1.44 for laparotomy and 1.25 for multiple approaches).Conclusions POP surgery is associated with low rates of complication and recurrence. Complications occurred most commonly following combined surgeries for both prolapse and incontinence and in hospitals with low surgical volumes. Concomitant hysterectomy appears to be protective for the need for additional prolapse surgery, and the vaginal route leads to a lower frequency of secondary surgery for urinary incontinence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Population-based studies suggest a protective effect of hysterectomy on POP reoperation rates up to 7 years after index surgery.
“By contrast, population-based studies suggest a protective effect of hysterectomy on POP reoperation rates up to 7 years after index surgery.57,67,68”
From Hysterectomy versus uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a prospective cohort study (2025) · cites this paper as [67]
Cites
For the Systematic Review Group of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, Abed, H., Rahn, D. D., Lowenstein, L., Balk, E. M., Clemons, J. L., & Rogers, R. G. (2011) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1384-5 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Meriwether, K. V., Antosh, D. D., Olivera, C. K., Kim-Fine, S., Balk, E. M., Murphy, M., Grimes, C. L., Sleemi, A., Singh, R., Dieter, A. A., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Data Resource Profile: The French National Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set Database (PMSI)
Boudemaghe, T., & Belhadj, I. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw359 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Abbott, S., Unger, C. A., Evans, J. M., Jallad, K., Mishra, K., Karram, M. M., Iglesia, C. B., Rardin, C. R., & Barber, M. D. (2013) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.012 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Lucot, J., Cosson, M., Bader, G., Debodinance, P., Akladios, C., Salet-Lizée, D., Delporte, P., Savary, D., Ferry, P., Deffieux, X., et al. (2018) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.044 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence
Salvatore, S., Athanasiou, S., Digesu, G. A., Soligo, M., Sotiropoulou, M., Serati, M., Antsaklis, A., & Milani, R. (2009) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.20639 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Barski, D., Otto, T., & Gerullis, H. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse
Maher, C., Baeßler, K., Barber, M. D., Cheong, C., Consten, E. C. J., Cooper, K. G., Deffieux, X., Dietz, V., Gutman, R. E., van Iersel, J. J., et al. (2018) · Climacteric · doi:10.1080/13697137.2018.1551348 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Alas, A., Chinthakanan, O., Espaillat, L., Plowright, L. N., Davila, G. W., & Aguilar, V. C. (2016) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3149-7 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years
Vandendriessche, D., Sussfeld, J., Giraudet, G., Lucot, J.-P., Behal, H., & Cosson, M. (2016) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3093-6 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationLeruth, J., Fillet, M., & Waltregny, D. (2012) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1888-7 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Mesh–related and intraoperative complications of pelvic organ prolapse repair
Kasyan, G. R., Abramyan, K., Popov, А. А., Gvozdev, M. Y., & DIu, P. (2014) · Editor-in-Chief s Voice List of Authors is an Important Element in a Scientific Publication · doi:10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art17 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Warembourg, S., Labaki, M., de Tayrac, R., Costa, P., & Fatton, B. (2017) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3256-5 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Ennemoser, S., Schönfeld, M., von Bodungen, V., et al. (2012) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1765-4 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Meriwether, K., Balk, E., Antosh, D., Olivera, C., Kim-Fine, S., Murphy, M., Grimes, C., Sleemi, A., Singh, R., Dieter, A., et al. (2019) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-019-03876-2 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
de Oliveira, S. A., Fonseca, M. C. M., Bortolini, M. A. T., Girão, M. J. B. C., Roque, M. T., & Castro, R. A. (2017) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-017-3433-1 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Barski, D., & Deng, D. Y. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/831285 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Dallas, K., Elliott, C. S., Syan, R., Sohlberg, E., Enemchukwu, E., & Rogo-Gupta, L. (2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002913 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Al-Mandeel, H. M., Ross, S., Robert, M., & Milne, J. (2011) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.20947 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Risk factors for recurrence of genital prolapse
Salvatore, S., Siesto, G., & Serati, M. (2010) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0b013e32833e4974 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
De novo urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery—a national database study
Khayyami, Y., Elmelund, M., Lose, G., et al. (2019) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-019-04041-5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Facteurs de risque d’exposition de prothèse dans les cures de prolapsus génital par voie vaginale
Guillibert, F., Chêne, G., Fanget, C., Huss, M., SEFFERT, P., & Chauleur, C. (2009) · Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité · doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.04.010 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Hokenstad, E. D., Glasgow, A. E., Habermann, E. B., et al. (2017) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000379 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Sabadell, J., Salicrú, S., Montero-Armengol, A., Rodríguez-Mias, N. L., Gil‐Moreno, A., & Poza-Barrasús, J. L. (2018) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-018-3805-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brennand, E. A., Scime, N. V., Huang, B., Edwards, A. D., Kim-Fine, S., Hall, J., Birch, C., Robert, M., & Carter Ramirez, A. (2025) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.021 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy; a 10-year national follow-up study
Kuittinen, T., Mentula, M., Tulokas, S., Brummer, T., Jalkanen, J., Tomas, E., Mäkinen, J., Sjöberg, J., Härkki, P., & Rahkola-Soisalo, P. (2024) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-024-07615-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after apical prolapse repair: does obesity matter?
Metcalfe, N. D., Shandley, L. M., Young, M. R., Higgins, M., Abanulo, C., & Northington, G. M. (2022) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04806-x · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mairesse, S., Chazard, E., Giraudet, G., Cosson, M., & Bartolo, S.
- Affiliations
- Université de Lille (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Mairesse, Sybil
- Venue
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2020-01-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1755-1761
- ISSN
- 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3023
- OpenAlex
- W2999453440
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ureteral procedures and complications
- Keywords
- pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse surgery, surgical complications, reoperation, prolapse recurrence, hysterectomy, urinary incontinence, surgical treatment of incontinence, hospital readmission, surgical volume, obesity, laparoscopy, laparotomy
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Surgeons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review