Cited by 7Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUterine Myomas and Treatments

Understanding Factors That Affect Willingness to Self-Manage a Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study of Pessary-Using Women in the UK

Open access
Dwyer, Lucy, Rajai, Azita, Dowding, Dawn, Kearney, Rohna·2024·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis: Pessary self-management offers benefits to women with no increased risk of complications. However, many are unwilling to self-manage, preferring clinician-led care. This study is aimed at exploring factors associated with willingness to self-manage a pessary. Methods: Women attending pessary clinic at a UK hospital were asked to complete a questionnaire providing responses on pessary use, comorbidities, female genital self-image, self-management experience and willingness (or not) to learn self-management. Based upon statistical advice we aimed to recruit 90 women. Data were analysed using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test and Chi-squared test. Free text data were analysed thematically. Results: A total of 89 women completed the questionnaire. Thirty-three women (38%) had previously been taught pessary self-management. Of the remaining women, 12 (21%) were willing to learn, 28 (50%) were not willing and 16 (29%) were unsure. There was no correlation between female genital self-image and willingness to self-manage a pessary. Younger women were more willing to learn self-management (p = < 0.001). Willing women were motivated by reduced follow-up visits. Self-managing women reported benefits including increased autonomy, cleanliness and giving their body “a break”. Reasons discouraging women from self-managing were a lack of confidence; feeling physically unable; wanting clinician-led care; fear of problems or previous problems with their pessary. Conclusions: Most women were either unsure about pessary self-management or unwilling to self-manage. Age was the only factor we found that had a significant relationship with willingness to self-manage a pessary. With robust self-management teaching, support and follow-up, it is likely that many of the barriers women report can be overcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-024-05840-1

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Oha AN. Impediments of self-managed type 2 diabetes in Mgbidi women, Nigeria. Dissertation, 2018.
  2. [26]Jacobs S, Banks E. Pilot study: pessary use in Bronx women. Would increasing the practice of self-changing pessaries have potential to positively impact body image? J Pelvic Med Surg. 2010;16(5):S143–4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dwyer, L., Rajai, A., Dowding, D., & Kearney, R.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Dwyer, Lucy
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2024-07-02
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1627-1634
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W4400240885
Cited by
7
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR300519)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, female genital self-image, barriers to self-management, patient autonomy
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Pessaries, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review