Cited by 8Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studies

Updates in Pessary Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Narrative Review

Open access
Sethi, Namrata, Yadav, Ghanshyam S.·2025·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects millions of women globally, significantly impacting quality of life. Pessaries serve as a first-line, non-surgical option for symptom relief, particularly among women who wish to avoid or delay surgery. Despite widespread use, challenges persist in fitting, patient education, and long-term adherence, necessitating further advancements in design and care protocols. This narrative review was conducted to explore the role of vaginal pessaries in the management of POP, focusing on efficacy, patient adherence, complications, and emerging innovations. Pessaries demonstrate high initial success rates, but long-term adherence varies. Improper fit, discomfort, and lack of self-management contribute to discontinuation. Complications, including vaginal discharge, erosion, and bleeding, are common but generally manageable. Recent innovations, such as self-removable pessaries, 3D-printed custom designs, and hormone-releasing pessaries, show promise in improving patient experience and adherence. Studies support self-management as a cost-effective strategy that enhances patient autonomy and reduces clinic visits. Pessaries remain a valuable conservative treatment for POP, yet challenges in long-term adherence highlight the need for standardized fitting protocols, better patient education, and continued innovation in design. Future advancements should focus on patient-centered, user-friendly solutions to enhance effectiveness, comfort, and self-care, ultimately empowering women with more accessible and sustainable pelvic health options.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm14082737

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of newer 3-D printed pessaries appears to be associated with improvements in quality of life and in the pelvic floor distress inventory in small pilot studies.

    “For example, use of newer 3‐D printed pessaries appears to be associated with improvements in quality of life and in the pelvic floor distress inventory in small pilot studies, warranting further exploration of use [52, 53, 54].”

    From How Can We Improve the Assessment and Indifferent Outcomes From Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management From Conservative and Surgical Therapies? ICI‐RS 2025 (2026) · cites this paper as [54]

    Section 8, “New Dimensions” (page not provided), describes an eight-woman, three-week pilot of customized pessaries made with 3D-printed molds. Participants reported improvement or no change in ease of use, comfort, and support, but the review does not report improvements in quality of life or Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory scores for those pessaries. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sethi, N., & Yadav, G. S.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Yadav, Ghanshyam S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-04-16
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
2737
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409507320
Cited by
8
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, pessary, pessary fitting, pessary complications, self-management, patient education, non-surgical management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review