Cited by 270Bone health and osteoporosis researchMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsHip and Femur Fractures

The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50–99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA)

Siris, E. S., Brenneman, S. K., Barrett-Connor, E., Miller, P. D., Sajjan, S., Berger, M. L., Chen, Y.-T.·2006·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

Introduction This study evaluates the effect of age and bone mineral density (BMD) on the absolute, excess, and relative risk for osteoporotic fractures at the hip, wrist, forearm, spine, and rib within 3 years of peripheral BMD testing in postmenopausal women over a wide range of postmenopausal ages. Methods Data were obtained from 170,083 women, aged 50-99 years, enrolled in the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) following recruitment from their primary care physicians' offices across the United States. Risk factors for fracture and peripheral BMD T-scores at the heel, forearm, or finger were obtained at baseline. Self-reported new fractures at the hip, spine, rib, wrist, and forearm were obtained from questionnaires at 1- and 3-year follow-ups. Absolute, excess (attributable to low BMD), and unadjusted and adjusted relative risks of fracture were calculated. Results At follow-up, 5312 women reported 5676 fractures (868 hip, 2420 wrist/forearm, 1531 rib, and 857 spine). Absolute risk of fracture increased with age for all fracture sites. This age-effect was most evident for hip fracture--both the incidence and the excess risk of hip fracture for women with low BMD increased at least twofold for each decade increase in age. The relative risk for any fracture per 1 SD decrease in BMD was similar across age groups (p>0.07). Women with low BMD (T-score Conclusions At any given BMD, not only the absolute fracture risk but also the excess fracture risk increased with ad…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-005-0027-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siris, E. S., Brenneman, S. K., Barrett-Connor, E., Miller, P. D., Sajjan, S., Berger, M. L., & Chen, Y.-T.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Colorado Center for Bone Research (US)
Corresponding author
Siris, E. S.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2006-01-04
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
565-574
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W2058695789
Cited by
270
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
22.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Merck
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
Keywords
osteoporotic fractures, postmenopausal women, bone mineral density, hip fracture, wrist fractures, forearm fractures, spinal fractures, rib fractures, osteopenia, T-score
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Forearm Injuries, Hip Fractures, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Rib Fractures, United States, Wrist Injuries, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Spinal Fractures, Risk Assessment, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review