Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 146

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density?

LaCroix, A. Z., Beck, T. J., Cauley, J. A., Lewis, C. E., Bassford, T., Jackson, R., Wu, G., Chen, Z.·2010·Osteoporosis International
DOI 10.1007/s00198-009-1056-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-009-1056-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Department of Health and Human Services (2004) Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. Office of the Surgeon General, Rockville, MD
  2. Seeman E (2008) Bone quality: the material and structural basis of bone strength. J Bone Miner Metab 26:1–8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Mellstrom D, Meunier PJ, Melton LJ 3rd, O'Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kaptoge S, Beck TJ, Reeve J, Stone KL, Hillier TA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR (2008) Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 23:1892–1904 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rivadeneira F, Zillikens MC, De Laet CE, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, Beck TJ, Pols HA (2007) Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 22:1781–1790 · DOI
  6. (1998) Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group. Control Clin Trials 19:61-109 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Curb JD, McTiernan A, Heckbert SR, Kooperberg C, Stanford J, Nevitt M, Johnson KC, Proulx-Burns L, Pastore L, Criqui M, Daugherty S (2003) Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women's Health Initiative. Ann Epidemiol 13:S122–S128 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hays J, Hunt JR, Hubbell FA, Anderson GL, Limacher M, Allen C, Rossouw JE (2003) The Women's Health Initiative recruitment methods and results. Ann Epidemiol 13:S18–S77 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Martin RB, Burr DB (1984) Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry. J Biomech 17:195–201 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Robbins J, Aragaki AK, Kooperberg C, Watts N, Wactawski-Wende J, Jackson RD, LeBoff MS, Lewis CE, Chen Z, Stefanick ML, Cauley J (2007) Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 298:2389–2398 · DOI
  11. Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB, Sievanen H, Wahner HW (2000) Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res 15:2297–2304 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Feik SA, Thomas CD, Bruns R, Clement JG (2000) Regional variations in cortical modeling in the femoral mid-shaft: sex and age differences. Am J Phys Anthropol 112:191–205 · DOI
  13. Martin RB, Atkinson PJ (1977) Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. J Biomech 10:223–231 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Bonfield W, Burgoyne CJ, Reeve J (2005) Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk. Lancet 366:129–135 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1988) Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia. J Orthop Res 6:886–896 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Sievanen H, Uusi-Rasi K, Heinonen A, Oja P, Vuori I (1999) Disproportionate, age-related bone loss in long bone ends: a structural analysis based on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 10:295–302 · DOI
  17. Smith RW Jr, Walker RR (1964) Femoral expansion in aging women: implications for osteoporosis and fractures. Science 145:156–157 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Stein MS, Thomas CD, Feik SA, Wark JD, Clement JG (1998) Bone size and mechanics at the femoral diaphysis across age and sex. J Biomech 31:1101–1110 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
LaCroix, A. Z., Beck, T. J., Cauley, J. A., Lewis, C. E., Bassford, T., Jackson, R., Wu, G., & Chen, Z.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-09-15
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
919-929
ISSN
  • 0937-941X
  • 1433-2965
DOI
10.1007/s00198-009-1056-1
Cited by
146
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.