Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monitoring time interval for pQCT-derived bone outcomes in postmenopausal women

Duckham, R. L., Frank, A. W., Johnston, J. D., Olszynski, W. P., Kontulainen, S. A.·2013·Osteoporosis International
DOI 10.1007/s00198-012-2242-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-012-2242-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929–1936 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women—results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286:2815–2822 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bonnick SL (2007) HSA: beyond BMD with DXA. Bone 41:S9–S12
  4. Butz S, Wuster C, Scheidt-Nave C, Gotz M, Ziegler R (1994) Forearm BMD as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in a German reference population. Osteoporos Int 4:179–184 · DOI
  5. Rinaldi G, Wisniewski CA, Setty NG, Leboff MS (2011) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography: optimization of reproducibility measures of bone density, geometry, and strength at the radius and tibia. J Clin Densitom 14:367–373 · DOI
  6. Grampp S, Lang P, Jergas M, Gluer CC, Mathur A, Engelke K, Genant H (1995) Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 10:1566–1576 · DOI
  7. Szabo KA, Webber CE, Gordon C, Adachi JD, Tozer R, Papaioannou A (2011) Reproducibility of peripheral quantitative computed tomography measurements at the radius and tibia in healthy pre and postmenopausal women. Can Assoc Radiol J 62:183–189 · DOI
  8. Swinford RR, Warden SJ (2010) Factors affecting short-term precision of musculoskeletal measures using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Osteoporos Int 21:1863–1870 · DOI
  9. Rittweger J, Felsenberg D (2009) Recovery of muscle atrophy and bone loss from 90 days of bed rest: results from a one-year follow-up. Bone 44:214–224 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Groll O, Lochmuller E, Bachmeier M, Willnecker J, Eckstein F (1999) Precision and intersite correlation of bone densitometry at the radius, tibia and femur with peripheral quantitative CT. Skeletal Radiol 28:696–702 · DOI
  11. Sievanen H, Koskue V, Rauhio A, Kannus P, Heinonen A, Vuori I (1998) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in human long bones: evaluation of in vitro and in vivo precision. J Bone Miner Res 13:871–882 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK (1995) Accurate assessment of precision errors—how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5:262–270 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, Augat P, Bogado CE, Bouxsein ML, Felsenberg D, Ito M, Prevrhal S, Hans DB, Lewiecki ME (2008) Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of Osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom 11:123–162 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Baim S, Wilson CR, Lewiecki EM, Luckey MM, Downs RW, Lentle BC (2005) Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 8:371–378 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gluer CC (1999) Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques. J Bone Miner Res 14:1952–1962 · DOI
  16. Shepherd JA, Wang L, Fan B, Gilsanz V, Kalkwarf HJ, Lappe J, Lu Y, Hangartner T, Zemel BS, Fredrick M, Oberfield S, Winer KK (2011) Optimal monitoring time interval between dxa measures in children. J Bone Miner Res 26:2745–2752 · DOI
  17. Kreiger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Mackenzie T, Poliquin S, Brown JP, Prior JC, Rittmaster RS (1999) The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 18:376–387 · DOI
  18. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (2001) International standards for anthropometric assessment. ISAK, Canberra
  19. Kontulainen SA, Johnston JD, Liu D, Leung C, Oxland TR, McKay H (2008) Strength indices from pQCT imaging predict up to 85 % of variance in bone failure properties at tibial epiphysis and diaphysis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 8:401–409
  20. Ashe MC, Khan KM, Kontulainen SA, Guy P, Liu D (2006) Accuracy of pQCT for evaluating the aged human radius: an ashing, histomorphometry and failure load investigation. Osteoporos Int 17:1241–1251 · DOI
  21. Marjanovic EJ, Ward KA, Adams JE (2009) The impact of accurate positioning on measurements made by peripheral QCT in the distal radius. Osteoporos Int 20:1207–1214 · DOI

Cited by

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Duckham, R. L., Frank, A. W., Johnston, J. D., Olszynski, W. P., & Kontulainen, S. A.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1917-1922
ISSN
  • 0937-941X
  • 1433-2965
DOI
10.1007/s00198-012-2242-0
Cited by
18
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.