The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography in Human Long Bones: Evaluation of In Vitro and In Vivo Precision
Open accessAbstract
Despite the excellent performance in clinical practice and research, the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is restricted by the inherent planar nature of the measurement and the inability to discriminate between trabecular and cortical components of bone. Recently, a new peripheral tomographic scanner (Norland/Stratec XCT 3000) was introduced for versatile measurements of human long bone characteristics in vivo, including trabecular and cortical density (TrD and CoD, respectively), respective cross-sectional areas (TrA and CoA), bone strength index (BSI), and bone mineral content (BMC). We evaluated the technical performance of the scanner using different phantoms and determined the in vivo precision of the above-noted applications by measuring twice several sites of upper and lower limbs of 19 and 36 volunteers aged 23–60 years. The bone scans were performed, with intermediate positioning of the subject, at two different anatomic sites of the forearm, three sites of the upper arm, three sites of the shank, and two sites of the thigh, with the respective skeletal sites representing different bone compositions and sizes. According to phantom measurements, the XCT 3000 appeared to be a highly linear, stable, and precise (coefficient of variation [CV] about 0.2%) system in vitro. The soft tissue thickness, however, had a linear effect on density values and a nonlinear effect on BMC, whereas the effect on cross-sectional area was marginal. The in vivo root mean square CV (CVrms) values for the long bone ends ranged from 0.9% (distal tibia) to 2.7% (distal femur) for TrD, from 1.8% (distal femur) to 7.6% (distal radius) for TrA, from 2.0% (distal tibia) to 6.8% (proximal tibia) for CoD, from 1.8% (distal femur) to 4.9% (proximal tibia) for CoA, and from 4.2% (distal tibia) to 7.7% (distal radius) for BSI. The corresponding CVrms values for the long bone shafts ranged from 0.5% (midshaft of humerus) to 1.4% (midshaft of fibula) for CoD, from 1.7% (midshaft of tibia) to 4.6% (proximal shaft of humerus) for CoA, and from 2.5% (midshaft of tibia) to 7.5% (proximal shaft of humerus) for BSI. There was no interoperator effect on precision. This study provided, for the first time, independent precision data for the new XCT 3000 peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner in various applications of human long bones (radius, ulna, humerus, tibia, fibula, and femur) and gave practical guidelines and procedures on how to employ this versatile method in clinical and research applications. The technical performance of the tested system was excellent and it allowed, with a low radiation dose, precise in vivo evaluation of trabecular and cortical density, cross-sectional area, and BMC of selected skeletal sites. The potential effect of the soft tissue thickness on density and mineral content values need to be recognized. The pQCT measurement seems to be useful in supplementing the integral, planar DXA data and obviously opens new possibilities for clinical practice and research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
The aging of Wolff’s “law”: Ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone
Pearson, O. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20155 · Cited by 745
From space to Earth: Advances in human physiology from 20 years of bed rest studies (1986–2006)
Pavy-Le Traon, A., Heer, M., Narici, M. V., Rittweger, J., & Vernikos, J. (2007) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0474-z · Cited by 658
Gaudio, A., Muratore, F., Fiore, V., Rapisarda, R., Signorelli, S. S., & Fiore, C. E. (2015) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3057-6 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sievänen, H., Koskue, V., Rauhio, A., Kannus, P., Heinonen, A., & Vuori, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 871-882
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2089410486
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography in Human Long Bones: Evaluation of In Vitro and In Vivo Precision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.5.871
- The paper
- Sievänen, H., Koskue, V., Rauhio, A., Kannus, P., Heinonen, A., & Vuori, I. (1998). Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography in Human Long Bones: Evaluation of In Vitro and In Vivo Precision. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.5.871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.