The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A nationwide study of the incidence rate of herb-induced liver injury in Korea
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“using the RUCAM algorithm but leaving individual causality grading unreported for unknown reason(s),51,54”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For Korea again, Cho et al.54 reported HILI prevalence results from a nationwide multicenter and prospective study with 6/1001 patients (0.6%).”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the inclusion of cases with a possible causality grading that impairs the focus on cases with a probable or highly probable causality grading40,41,42,50,52,54”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“forgetting quotation of the used RUCAM publication,51,54”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“With 0.6%, identical data of HILI prevalence were achieved;51,54,73”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“HILI is seemingly not a problem in Korea,51,54,73 similar to Germany, considering the low TCM-related HILI incidence data.77”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“The low prevalence data were achieved by both groups using HILI cases with ALT thresholds of at least 3×ULN, which included many cases with unspecific LT increases.51,54,73”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Björnsson, E. S., Bergmann, O. M., Björnsson, H. K., Kvaran, R. B., & Olafsson, S. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.006 · Cited by 865
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Andrade RJ, Lucena MI, Fernandez MC (2005) Drug-induced liver injury: an analysis of 461 incidences submitted to the Spanish registry over a 10-year period. Gastroenterology 129:512–521 · DOI · Paper page
- Bagheri H, Michel F, Lapeyre-Mestre M (2000) Detection and incidence of drug-induced liver injuries in hospital: a prospective analysis from laboratory signals. Br J Clin Pharmacol 50:479–484 · DOI
- Björnsson ES (2015) Drug-induced liver injury: an overview over the most critical compounds. Arch Toxicol 89:327–334. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1456-2 · DOI
- Chalasani N, Fontana RJ, Bonkovsky HL (2008) Causes, clinical features, and outcomes from a prospective study of drug-induced liver injury in the United States. Gastroenterology 135:1924–1934 · DOI · Paper page
- García-Cortés M, Stephens C, Lucena MI (2011) Spanish Group for the Study of Drug-Induced Liver Disease (Grupo de Estudio para las Hepatopatías Asociadas a Medicamentos GEHAM). Causality assessment methods in drug induced liver injury: strengths and weaknesses. J Hepatol 55:683–691 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghabril M, Chalasani N, Björnsson E (2010) Drug-induced liver injury: a clinical update. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 26:222–226 · DOI · Paper page
- Jeong TY, Park BK, Cho JH (2012) A prospective study on the safety of herbal medicines, used alone or with conventional medicines. J Ethnopharmacol 143:884–888 · DOI
- Kwon H, Lee SH, Kim SE (2012) Spontaneously reported hepatic adverse drug events in Korea: multicenter study. J Korean Med Sci 27:268–273 · DOI
- Larrey D, Faure S (2011) Herbal medicine hepatotoxicity: a new step with development of specific biomarkers. J Hepatol 54:599–601 · DOI
- Li B, Wang Z, Fang JJ (2007) Evaluation of prognostic markers in severe drug-induced liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 13:628–632 · DOI
- Lucena MI, Andrade RJ, Kaplowitz N (2009) Phenotypic characterization of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: the influence of age and sex. Hepatology 49:2001–2009 · DOI · Paper page
- Mantani N, Kogure T, Sakai S (2002) Incidence and clinical features of liver injury related to Kampo (Japanese herbal) medicine in 2496 cases between 1979 and 1999: problems of the lymphocyte transformation test as a diagnostic method. Phytomedicine 9:280–287 · DOI
- Medina-Caliz I, Robles-Diaz M, Garcia-Muñoz B (2016) Spanish DILI registry. Definition and risk factors for chronicity following acute idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol 65:532–542 · DOI · Paper page
- Meier Y, Cavallaro M, Roos M (2005) Incidence of drug-induced liver injury in medical inpatients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 61:135–143 · DOI
- Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiodt FV (2002) Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med 137:947–954 · DOI · Paper page
- Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J (2010) US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network. Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment method. Hepatology 51:2117–2126 · DOI · Paper page
- Rossi S, Navarro VJ (2014) Herbs and liver injury: a clinical perspective. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:1069–1076 · DOI
- Shin YS, Lee YW, Choi YH (2009) Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug events by Korean regional pharmacovigilance centers. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 18:910–915 · DOI
- Stickel F, Shouval D (2015) Hepatotoxicity of herbal and dietary supplements: an update. Arch Toxicol 89:851–865. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1471-3 · DOI
- Suk KT, Kim DJ, Kim CH (2012) A prospective nationwide study of drug-induced liver injury in Korea. Am J Gastroenterol 107:1380–1387 · DOI · Paper page
- Takikawa H (2010) Recent status of drug-induced liver injury and its problems in Japan. JMAJ 53:243–247
- Woo HJ, Kim HY (2015) Choi ES (2015) Drug-induced liver injury: A 2-year retrospective study of 1169 hospitalized patients in a single medical center. Phytomedicine 22:1201–1205 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teschke, R., Zhu, Y., & Jing, J. (2020) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology · doi:10.14218/jcth.2020.00009 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Cho, J.-H., Oh, D.-S., Hong, S.-H., Ko, H., Lee, N.-H., Park, S.-E., Han, C.-W., Kim, S.-M., Kim, Y.-C., Kim, K.-S., Choi, C.-W., Shin, S.-M., Kim, K.-T., Choi, H.-S., Lee, J.-H., Kim, J.-Y., Kang, J.-Y., Lee, D.-S., Ahn, Y.-C., & Son, C.-G.
- ORCID
- Son, Chang-Gue
- Venue
- Archives of Toxicology
- Published
- 2017-06-20
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4009-4015
- ISSN
- 0340-5761
- 1432-0738
- PMC
- PMC5719126
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
