The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nicotine-conditioned single-trial place preference: selective role of nucleus accumbens shell dopamine D1 receptors in acquisition
Abstract
Rationale Experimental evidence indicates that the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway innervating the ventral striatum is critically involved in the motivational effects of drug abuse. However, the role of DA transmission of the two main subdivisions of the nucleus accumbens (NAc), the shell and the core, in the motivational properties of nicotine is unknown.Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the role of DA D1 and D2 receptors of the rat NAc shell and core in the motivational effects of nicotine using a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm.Methods The effect of the intracerebral infusion of DA antagonists specific for DA D1 (SCH 39166) and D2 receptors (L-sulpiride) was studied in a single-trial place-conditioning paradigm with fixed assignment of the drug to the unpreferred compartment.Results Nicotine induced significant CPP at the dose of 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg subcutaneously (s.c.). Intra-NAc shell infusion of SCH 39166 (6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 ng bilaterally, 10 min before nicotine administration), impaired in a dose-dependent manner the acquisition of CPP by nicotine (0.4 mg/kg s.c.). SCH 39166 failed to affect nicotine CPP when infused into the NAc core. L-sulpiride (25 and 50 ng bilaterally) had no effect on acquisition after intra-Nac shell infusion. SCH 39166 and L-sulpiride were ineffective after infusion in the NAc shell and core 10 min before the test session.Conclusions The results indicate that dopamine D1 but not D2 receptors of the NAc shell are specifically involved in the acquisition of nicotine-induced CPP.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, microinjections of dopaminergic antagonists into the shell, but not the core, disrupt conditioned place preference induced by systemic nicotine or morphine”
From Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex (2007) · cites this paper as Spina et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Microinjections of dopamine receptor antagonists into the medial accumbens shell, but not the core, during the acquisition phase disrupt conditioned place preference induced by systemic administration of nicotine or opiates (Fenu et al., 2006; Spina et al., 2006).”
From Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex (2007) · cites this paper as Spina et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“The blockade of dopamine receptors in the medial shell just before preference testing does not change conditioned place preference induced by nicotine or morphine administration, even though the same treatments during the acquisition phase disrupt the acquisition of conditioned place preference (Fenu et al., 2006; Spina et al., 2006).”
From Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex (2007) · cites this paper as Spina et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“SCH 23390 administration into the accumbens core does not disrupt stimulus-outcome association in conditioned place preference procedures (Fenu et al., 2006; Spina et al., 2006).”
From Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex (2007) · cites this paper as Spina et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
Paxinos, G., & Watson, C. (1983) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63235-9 · Cited by 28,585
Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons
Schultz, W. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1 · Cited by 4,564
Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy
Stern, C. D. (1986) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/0197-0186(86)90021-5 · Cited by 4,160
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Integrative activity of the brain
Konorski, J. (1967) · Cited by 1,372
Tzschentke, T. (1998) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00060-4 · Cited by 1,280
Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward?
Bardo, M. T., & Bevins, R. A. (2000) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130000569 · Cited by 1,274
Specificity in the projection patterns of accumbal core and shell in the rat
Heimer, L., Zahm, D. S., Churchill, L., Kalivas, P. W., & Wohltmann, C. (1991) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90202-y · Cited by 1,219
Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis
Wise, R. A. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00010372 · Cited by 1,028
Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction
Di Chiara, G. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00286-3 · Cited by 996
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Carr GD, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1989) Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ (eds) Neuropharmacological basis of reward. Oxford, New York, pp 264–319
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Lüscher, C., Python, L., Liu, Y., Chaudun, F., & Pascoli, V. (2026) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2026.06.011 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Spina, L., Fenu, S., Longoni, R., Rivas, E., & Di Chiara, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2005-12-10
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 447-455
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2051196507
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- nicotine, conditioned place preference, nucleus accumbens shell, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, mesolimbic dopamine system, drug motivation, nicotine dependence, dopamine antagonists, SCH 39166
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Association Learning, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Conditioning, Classical, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Motivation, Nicotine, Nucleus Accumbens, Social Environment, Tobacco Use Disorder, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review