Cited by 56Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismTreatment of Major DepressionGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Rapid evidence review of the comparative effectiveness, harms, and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided antidepressant treatment versus usual care for major depressive disorder

Peterson, Kimberly, Dieperink, Eric, Anderson, Johanna, Boundy, Erin, Ferguson, Lauren, Helfand, Mark·2017·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Objective This study aims to conduct an evidence review of the effectiveness, harms, and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder.Methods We searched MEDLINE®, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through February 2017. We used prespecified criteria to select studies, abstract data, and rate internal validity and strength of the evidence (PROSPERO number CRD42016036358).Results We included two randomized trials (RCT), five controlled cohort studies, and six modeling studies of mostly women in their mid-40s with few comorbidities. CNSDose (ABCB1, ABCC1, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, UGT1A1) is the only pharmacogenomics test that significantly improved remission (one additional remitting patient in 12 weeks per three genotyped, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.5) and reduced intolerability in an RCT. ABCB1 genotyping leads to one additional remitting patient in 5 weeks per three genotyped (95% CI 3 to 20), but tolerability was not reported. In an RCT, GeneSight (CYP2D6, CYPC19, CYP1A2, SLC6A4, HTR2A) did not statistically significantly improve remission, and evidence is inconclusive about its tolerability. Evidence is generally low strength because RCTs were few and underpowered. Cost-effectiveness is unclear due to lack of directly observed cost-effectiveness outcomes. We found no studies that evaluated whether pharmacogenomics shortens time to optimal treatment, whether improvements were due to switches to genetically congruent medication, or whether effectiveness varies based on test and patient characteristics.Conclusions Certain pharmacogenomics tools show promise of improving short-term remission rates in women in their mid-40s with few comorbidities. But, important evidence limitations preclude recommending their widespread use and indicate a need for further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-017-4622-9

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, K., Dieperink, E., Anderson, J., Boundy, E., Ferguson, L., & Helfand, M.
Affiliations
  • Portland VA Medical Center (US)
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Kimberly
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2017-04-29
Volume
234
Issue
11
Pages
1649-1661
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2519297859
Cited by
56
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (Project #09-199)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
pharmacogenomics, antidepressant treatment, major depressive disorder, pharmacogenetic testing, CYP2D6, CYP2C19, P-glycoprotein, remission, treatment tolerability, cost-effectiveness, usual care
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Major Depressive Disorder, Genotype, Humans, Pharmacogenetics, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review