Cited by 194Pesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesAnalytical chemistry methods development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultratrace-level determination of glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid and glufosinate in natural waters by solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: performance tuning of derivatization, enrichment and detection

Open access
Hanke, Irene, Singer, Heinz, Hollender, Juliane·2008·Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Abstract

A sensitive and robust analytical method for the quantification of glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) and glufosinate in natural water has been developed on the basis of a derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethylchloroformate (FMOC-Cl), solid-phase extraction (SPE) and liquid chromatography followed by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS). In order to maximize sensitivity, the derivatization was optimized regarding organic solvent content, amount of FMOC-Cl and reaction time. At an acetonitrile content of 10% a derivatization yield of 100% was reached within two hours in groundwater and surface water samples. After a twofold dilution the low acetonitrile content allowed solid-phase extraction of a sample of originally 80 mL over 200 mg Strata-X cartridges. In order to decrease the load of the LC column and mass spectrometer with derivatization by-products (e.g., 9-fluorenylmethanol FMOC-OH), a rinsing step was performed for the SPE cartridge with dichloromethane. Acidification of the sample and addition of EDTA was used to minimize complexation of the target compounds with metal ions in environmental samples. Due to the large sample volume and the complete FMOC-OH removal, limits of quantification of 0.7 ng/L, 0.8 ng/L and 2.3 ng/L were achieved in surface water for glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate, respectively. The limits of detection were as low as 0.2 ng/L, 0.2 ng/L and 0.6 ng/L for glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate, respectively. Surface water and ground water samples spiked at 2 ng/L showed recoveries of 91-107%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00216-008-2134-5

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amines are also found in anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, and aminoglycosides such as gentamicin.

    “They are also found in anthracyclines, such as the antineoplastic drug doxorubicin, and aminoglycosides such as the antibiotic gentamicin.112,114,115”

    From Connecting metabolome and phenotype: recent advances in functional metabolomics tools for the identification of bioactive natural products (2024) · cites this paper as [115]

    The Introduction and Chemicals sections discuss glyphosate, AMPA, and glufosinate, while the Concentration of FMOC Cl section mentions other amines generally. Searches for doxorubicin, gentamicin, anthracyclines, aminoglycosides, and amines in drugs found no passage addressing the claimed examples; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hanke, I., Singer, H., & Hollender, J.
Affiliations
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Corresponding author
Singer, Heinz
Venue
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Published
2008-05-16
Volume
391
Issue
6
Pages
2265-2276
ISSN
  • 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-2650
OpenAlex
W2058038407
Cited by
194
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesamt für Umwelt
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid, glufosinate, herbicide residues, natural waters, groundwater, surface water, solid-phase extraction, metal complexation, ultra-trace detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review