CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsAction Observation and Synchronization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive eye movements in natural vision

Open access
Hayhoe, Mary M., McKinney, Travis, Chajka, Kelly, Pelz, Jeff B.·2012·Experimental Brain Research
DOI 10.1007/s00221-011-2979-2PMC PMC3328199
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the natural world, the brain must handle inherent delays in visual processing. This is a problem particularly during dynamic tasks. A possible solution to visuo-motor delays is prediction of a future state of the environment based on the current state and properties of the environment learned from experience. Prediction is well known to occur in both saccades and pursuit movements and is likely to depend on some kind of internal visual model as the basis for this prediction. However, most evidence comes from controlled laboratory studies using simple paradigms. In this study, we examine eye movements made in the context of demanding natural behavior, while playing squash. We show that prediction is a pervasive component of gaze behavior in this context. We show in addition that these predictive movements are extraordinarily precise and operate continuously in time across multiple trajectories and multiple movements. This suggests that prediction is based on complex dynamic visual models of the way that balls move, accumulated over extensive experience. Since eye, head, arm, and body movements all co-occur, it seems likely that a common internal model of predicted visual state is shared by different effectors to allow flexible coordination patterns. It is generally agreed that internal models are responsible for predicting future sensory state for control of body movements. The present work suggests that model-based prediction is likely to be a pervasive component in natural gaze control as well.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-011-2979-2

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hayhoe M (2009) Visual memory in motor planning and action. In: Brockmole J (ed) Memory for the visual world. Psychology Press, UK, pp 117–139

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–156 of 156

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hayhoe, M. M., McKinney, T., Chajka, K., & Pelz, J. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Hayhoe, Mary M.
ORCID
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-12-20
Volume
217
Issue
1
Pages
125-136
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
DOI
10.1007/s00221-011-2979-2
PMC
PMC3328199
OpenAlex
W1977007448
Cited by
155
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY005729, EY05729)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
predictive eye movements, gaze control, internal models, saccades, smooth pursuit eye movements, squash, natural behavior, motor coordination
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Movement, Pursuit, Smooth, Saccades, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review