Cited by 59Multisensory perception and integrationNeuroscience and Music PerceptionTactile and Sensory Interactions

Perceptual learning in temporal discrimination: asymmetric cross-modal transfer from audition to vision

Bratzke, Daniel, Seifried, Tanja, Ulrich, Rolf·2012·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

This study assessed possible cross-modal transfer effects of training in a temporal discrimination task from vision to audition as well as from audition to vision. We employed a pretest-training-post-test design including a control group that performed only the pretest and the post-test. Trained participants showed better discrimination performance with their trained interval than the control group. This training effect transferred to the other modality only for those participants who had been trained with auditory stimuli. The present study thus demonstrates for the first time that training on temporal discrimination within the auditory modality can transfer to the visual modality but not vice versa. This finding represents a novel illustration of auditory dominance in temporal processing and is consistent with the notion that time is primarily encoded in the auditory system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-012-3162-0

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Auditory temporal discrimination training can transfer to visual tasks with lower precision demands, whereas the reverse pattern is not observed, presumably because the trained representations are insufficiently fine grained.

    “Consistent with this view, auditory temporal discrimination training can transfer to visual tasks with lower precision demands, whereas the reverse pattern is not observed, presumably because the trained representations are insufficiently fine grained (Bratzke et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bratzke, D., Seifried, T., & Ulrich, R.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Bratzke, Daniel
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2012-07-07
Volume
221
Issue
2
Pages
205-210
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2031596616
Cited by
59
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
perceptual learning, temporal discrimination, cross-modal transfer, ear dominance, auditory temporal processing, visual temporal processing, intermodal transfer, time perception
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Perception, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Time Perception, Transfer, Psychology, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review