Cited by 178Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismSmoking Behavior and CessationSchizophrenia research and treatment

The effect of variable cigarette consumption on the interaction with clozapine and olanzapine

Haslemo, Tore, Eikeseth, Per Haakon, Tanum, Lars, Molden, Espen, Refsum, Helge·2006·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Objective Cigarette smoking has been shown in several studies to induce the metabolism of the cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) substrates clozapine and olanzapine. The aim of the present study was to investigate the dose-dependent effect of cigarette smoking on serum concentrations of these drugs in a naturalistic setting.Methods In 73 schizophrenic patients recruited from psychiatric nursing homes, patient characteristics, smoking habits, drug dosing and serum concentrations of clozapine (n=33) and olanzapine (n=40) were registered. Concentration to dose (C/D) ratios of clozapine and olanzapine in non-smokers and subgroups of smokers were compared.Results Fifty-nine patients (80%) were smokers and these were stratified into the following groups according to smoking habits: 1-6 (n=0), 7-12 (n=13), 13-19 (n=18) and >or=20 (n=28) cigarettes daily. While the mean ratio was twice as high in non-smokers compared to smokers for both drugs (p<0.01), the C/D ratios of clozapine and olanzapine were not significantly different between the subgroups of smokers (p >0.15). Absolute serum concentrations were also higher in non-smokers compared to smokers: 50% for clozapine (p=0.058) and 67% for olanzapine (p<0.01).Conclusion A daily consumption of 7-12 cigarettes is probably sufficient for maximum induction of clozapine and olanzapine metabolism. A 50% lower starting dose of both drugs in non-smokers seems rational to avoid side effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00228-006-0209-9

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haslemo, T., Eikeseth, P. H., Tanum, L., Molden, E., & Refsum, H.
Affiliations
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital (NO)
  • Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus (NO)
Corresponding author
Haslemo, Tore
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2006-11-07
Volume
62
Issue
12
Pages
1049-1053
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W1968322454
Cited by
178
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cigarette smoking, clozapine, olanzapine, CYP1A2 induction, drug metabolism, dose-dependent effects, concentration-to-dose ratio, serum drug concentration, schizophrenia, antipsychotic dosing, psychiatric nursing homes
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Adult, Aged, Benzodiazepines, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Clozapine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Schizophrenia, Smoking, Mass Spectrometry, Antipsychotic Agents, Drug Monitoring, Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review