Cited by 818Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Sex Differences in the Risk of Schizophrenia: Evidence From Meta-analysis

Aleman, André, Kahn, René S., Selten, Jean-Paul·2003·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in the risk of a particular disorder can yield important clues regarding its pathogenesis. The evidence for a sex difference in the risk of schizophrenia is inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to integrate results from the published literature and to provide a quantitative index of the male-female ratio for the incidence of schizophrenia. METHODS: The MEDLINE and PsychLIT databases were searched for English-language publications on "incidence and schizophrenia" that appeared during the period between January 1980 and September 2001. Population-based incidence studies using standard clinical diagnostic criteria were included if they reported sex-specific incidence rates. Sex-specific incidence figures were extracted directly from each study. Categorical analyses were conducted on a subset of studies that met specific methodological criteria (to minimize criterion bias, hospital bias, and age bias). Study categorization and data extraction were performed independently by 2 of us (A. A. and J.-P.S.). RESULTS: Log risk ratio meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. The incidence risk ratios for men to develop schizophrenia relative to women were 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.56) when all studies were included in the analysis (49 effect sizes), 1.31 (95% CI, 1.13-1.51) when studies that minimized selection biases were analyzed separately (23 effect sizes), and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.15-1.68) when only high-quality studies were included (11 effect sizes). The sex difference was significantly smaller in studies with sample years before 1980 than those with sample years after 1980. No significant sex differences were reported in studies from developing countries. A final analysis, limited to studies with an age cutoff of 64 years or older (16 effect sizes), yielded a mean risk ratio of 1.32 (95% CI, 1.13-1.55). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides evidence for a sex difference in the risk of developing schizophrenia, as reported in the published literature from the last 2 decades.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.60.6.565

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aleman, A., Kahn, R. S., & Selten, J.-P.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
565
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996254896
Cited by
818
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 42
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
schizophrenia, sex differences, incidence, schizophrenia pathogenesis, selection bias, older adults
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Sex Factors, Incidence, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review