Cited by 60Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentEating Disorders and BehaviorsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Weight changes associated with antiepileptic mood stabilizers in the treatment of bipolar disorder

Open access
Grootens, Koen P., Meijer, Anna, Hartong, Erwin G., Doornbos, Bennard, Bakker, P. Roberto, Al Hadithy, Asmar, Hoogerheide, Kirsten N., Overmeire, Frans +2 more·2018·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Objective To present up-to-date information and recommendations on the management of body weight changes during the use of antiepileptic mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder to help clinicians and patients make well-informed, practical decisions. Data sources Umbrella review. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the prevention, treatment, and monitoring of body weight changes as a side effect of the mood stabilizers valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate, and carbamazepine were identified in Embase (2010-2015, no language restrictions). Study selection The search yielded 18 relevant publications on antiepileptic mood stabilizers and weight changes in bipolar disorder. Data extraction Relevant scientific evidence was abstracted and put into a clinical perspective by a multidisciplinary expert panel of clinicians with expertise in the treatment of bipolar disorders across all age groups and a patient representative. Results Valproate has been proven to be associated with weight gain in up to 50% of its users, and can be detected 2-3 months after initiation. Carbamazepine has been proven to have a low risk of weight gain. Lamotrigine and topiramate are associated with weight loss. Other option for this sentence = Weigth gain has been proven to be associated with valproate use in up to 50% of its users, and can be detected within 2-3 months after initiation. Conclusion Each antiepileptic mood stabilizer has specific effects on body weight and accordingly requires a discrete education, prevention, monitoring, and treatment strategy. Clinicians are recommended to adopt an active, anticipatory approach, educating patients about weight change as an important side effect in order to come to informed shared decisions about the most suitable mood stabilizer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00228-018-2517-2

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. National Collaborating Centre for Mental health bipolar dis- order: the assessment and management of bipolar disorder in adults, children and young people in primary and secondary care; Updated edition 2014 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
  2. White W, Elmore L, Luthin DR, Cates ME (2013) Psychotropic- induced weight gain: a review of management strategies. Consultant 53(3):153-160

Authors
Grootens, K. P., Meijer, A., Hartong, E. G., Doornbos, B., Bakker, P. R., Al Hadithy, A., Hoogerheide, K. N., Overmeire, F., Marijnissen, R. M., & Ruhe, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • GGZ Drenthe (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Grootens, Koen P.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2018-08-07
Volume
74
Issue
11
Pages
1485-1489
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W2886780391
Cited by
60
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
bipolar disorder, weight change, valproic acid, lamotrigine, topiramate, carbamazepine, weight gain, weight loss, adverse drug reactions, patient education, shared decision-making, weight monitoring
MeSH terms
Anticonvulsants, Bipolar Disorder, Body Weight, Humans, Weight Gain, Weight Loss, Antimanic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review