Cited by 158Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Benzodiazepine use in an elderly community-dwelling population: Characteristics of users and factors associated with subsequent use

Fourrier, Annie, Letenneur, Luc, Dartigues, Jean, Moore, Nicholas, Bégaud, Bernard·2001·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Objectives The objective of this study was to describe determinants of current and subsequent benzodiazepine use in an elderly population, the Paquid cohort.Methods The study was conducted on a cohort of 2,792 community-dwelling subjects 65 years of age or more living in the Gironde department, southwestern France. Benzodiazepine use and its correlates were studied with data collected at inclusion in the cohort. Longitudinal analysis over a 5-year period of follow-up was done to identify baseline predictors of subsequent use.Results At baseline, prevalence rate of benzodiazepine use was 31.9%. It was associated with female gender [odds ratio (OR) = 2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.66, 2.46], previous psychiatric disease (OR = 2.87; 95% CI: 2.31, 3.56), concomitant antidepressant use (OR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.59, 3.78), depressive symptomatology (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.28, 2.26), multiple drug use (OR = 1.82; 95% CI: 1.50, 2.21), multiple chronic diseases (OR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.67) and poor self-perceived health (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.33, 2.0). For the 1926 benzodiazepine non-users at inclusion and followed during 5 years, incidence rate of subsequent use was 5.37 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 4.76, 5.98). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, previous psychiatric diseases, poor self-perceived life satisfaction and polymorbidity were significantly associated with subsequent benzodiazepine use.Conclusions Elderly people are heavy users of benzodiazepines. Independently from mental health status, those in poor health were most at risk of benzodiazepine use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002280100326

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fourrier, A., Letenneur, L., Dartigues, J., Moore, N., & Bégaud, B.
Affiliations
  • Université Bordeaux Segalen (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2001-06-30
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
419-425
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W2031479780
Cited by
158
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
benzodiazepine use, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, psychiatric comorbidity, antidepressant use, depressive symptoms, multimorbidity, health perception, life satisfaction, PAQUID cohort
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Benzodiazepines, Drug Utilization, Female, France, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Population Surveillance, Regression Analysis, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review