Cited by 5Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques

Caudal Antia-Buch reconstruction for helical defect reconstruction: Burow’s triangle always in the lobule

Franssen, B. B. G. M., Frechner, M. R.·2010·European Journal of Plastic Surgery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00238-010-0397-5

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Franssen-Frechner modification excises a wedge of tissue from the ear lobe and mobilizes the lobe and caudal ear tissue into the reconstruction.

    “after a wedge of tissue is excised from the ear lobe, the lobe and the ear tissue caudal to the defect are mobilized and incorporated into the reconstruction (Fig. 1).”

    From Antia-Buch versus Franssen-Frechner Technique (2021) · cites this paper as [2]

  • The Franssen-Frechner technique avoids violating the root of the helix and cephalic part of the ear and avoids excising unaffected scaphal cartilage, leaving ear width unaffected.

    “This avoids the need to violate the root of the helix and cephalic part of the ear and also avoids the need to excise unaffected scaphal cartilage, thus leaving the ear width unaffected.”

    From Antia-Buch versus Franssen-Frechner Technique (2021) · cites this paper as [2]

  • The main drawback of the Franssen-Frechner technique is reduction in ear height due to incorporating the ear lobe into the reconstruction, which is easily corrected by immediate contralateral ear lobe reduction.

    “The main drawback of this technique is reduction in the ear height, due to incorporating the ear lobe into the reconstruction. This, however, is easily corrected by performing an immediate contralateral ear lobe reduction, which results in similar ear height and ear lobe shape bilaterally, with scars that are well hidden.”

    From Antia-Buch versus Franssen-Frechner Technique (2021) · cites this paper as [2]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franssen, B. B. G. M., & Frechner, M. R.
Affiliations
Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL)
Corresponding author
Franssen, B. B. G. M.
Venue
European Journal of Plastic Surgery
Published
2010-02-17
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
105-107
ISSN
  • 0930-343X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0130
OpenAlex
W1993810575
Cited by
5
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Keywords
earlobe reconstruction, lobules

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review