Cited by 37Connective tissue disorders researchAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Aortic measurements in patients with aortopathy are larger and more reproducible by cardiac magnetic resonance compared with echocardiography

Nejatian, Atosa, Yu, Johan, Geva, Tal, White, Matthew T., Prakash, Ashwin·2015·Pediatric Cardiology

Abstract

Accurate and reproducible aortic measurements are essential in aortopathy patients. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is commonly used but has several limitations. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can offset these limitations but has not been directly compared with TTE. We compared the reproducibility of CMR and TTE measurements at multiple aortic levels. Patients with a connective tissue disorder (CTD) or bicommissural aortic valve (BAV) (n = 41; 22 CTD, 19 BAV; mean age 18.8 ± 8.9 years) with TTE and CMR imaging performed within 3 months of each other were randomly selected. Two blinded observers measured the aorta at multiple anatomic levels. Intra- and interobserver variability and agreement between techniques were assessed. Aortic root diameter measurements by TTE and CMR were equally reproducible (% error 4-10 %), but TTE measurements were systematically smaller by 5-7 % (p < 0.0001). Systematic differences were larger in BAV (11-12 %, p < 0.0001) due to root asymmetry. CMR measurements of aortic root cross-sectional area were feasible and highly reproducible (% error 5-8 %). Compared with CMR, ascending aorta measurements by TTE were less reproducible, especially in BAV (% error 21-24 vs. 6-7 %, p = 0.01). Distal aortic measurements by TTE were 14-29 % smaller and had poor reproducibility compared with CMR (% error 24-42 vs. 9-10 %; p < 0.0001). CMR measurement of the largest aortic root dimension is more reliable than TTE, especially when the root is asymmetric. Measurements of the thoracic aorta distal to the root by CMR are more accurate and reproducible than by TTE. These data support a role for CMR in aortopathy patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00246-015-1231-4

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CMR is superior to TTE for the diagnosis of BAV, aortic dilation and aortic arch anomalies while also providing important data on shunt fractions and ventricular volumes.

    “CMR is also superior to TTE for the diagnosis of BAV, aortic dilation and aortic arch anomalies395,429-433 while also providing important data on shunt fractions and ventricular volumes that may inform clinical management.388”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nejatian, A., Yu, J., Geva, T., White, M. T., & Prakash, A.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Prakash, Ashwin
Venue
Pediatric Cardiology
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
1761-1773
ISSN
  • 0172-0643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1971
OpenAlex
W884499701
Cited by
37
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
aortic root diameter, aortopathy, connective tissue diseases, bicuspid aortic valve, cardiac magnetic resonance, transthoracic echocardiography, measurement reproducibility, interobserver variability, thoracic aorta, pediatric patients
MeSH terms
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aorta, Aortic Valve, Aortography, Child, Child, Preschool, Connective Tissue Diseases, Echocardiography, Female, Heart Valve Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review