Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision

Open access
Verberne, Hein J., Acampa, Wanda, Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos, Ballinger, Jim, Bengel, Frank, De Bondt, Pieter, Buechel, Ronny R., Cuocolo, Alberto, van Eck-Smit, Berthe L. F., Flotats, Albert, Hacker, Marcus, Hindorf, Cecilia, Kaufmann, Philip A., Lindner, Oliver, Ljungberg, Michael, Lonsdale, Markus, Manrique, Alain, Minarik, David, Scholte, Arthur J. H. A., Slart, Riemer H. J. A., Trägårdh, Elin, de Wit, Tim C., Hesse, Birger·2015·European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
DOI 10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since the publication of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in 2005, many small and some larger steps of progress have been made, improving MPI procedures. In this paper, the major changes from the updated 2015 procedural guidelines are highlighted, focusing on the important changes related to new instrumentation with improved image information and the possibility to reduce radiation exposure, which is further discussed in relation to the recent developments of new International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) models. Introduction of the selective coronary vasodilator regadenoson and the use of coronary CT-contrast agents for hybrid imaging with SPECT/CT angiography are other important areas for nuclear cardiology that were not included in the previous guidelines. A large number of minor changes have been described in more detail in the fully revised version available at the EANM home page: https://eanm.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2015_myocardial_perfusion.pdf.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Verberne, H. J., Acampa, W., Anagnostopoulos, C., Ballinger, J., Bengel, F., De Bondt, P., Buechel, R. R., Cuocolo, A., van Eck-Smit, B. L. F., Flotats, A., Hacker, M., Hindorf, C., Kaufmann, P. A., Lindner, O., Ljungberg, M., Lonsdale, M., Manrique, A., Minarik, D., Scholte, A. J. H. A., Slart, R. H. J. A., Trägårdh, E., de Wit, T. C., & Hesse, B.
Venue
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-08-21
Volume
42
Issue
12
Pages
1929-1940
ISSN
  • 1619-7070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-7089
DOI
10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x
OpenAlex
W2137446284
Cited by
366
References
62
FWCI
24.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x
The paper
Verberne, H. J., Acampa, W., Anagnostopoulos, C., Ballinger, J., Bengel, F., De Bondt, P., Buechel, R. R., Cuocolo, A., van Eck-Smit, B. L. F., Flotats, A., Hacker, M., Hindorf, C., Kaufmann, P. A., Lindner, O., Ljungberg, M., Lonsdale, M., Manrique, A., Minarik, D., Scholte, A. J. H. A., . . . Hesse, B. (2015). EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.