The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large language models (LLM) and ChatGPT: what will the impact on nuclear medicine be?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The need to rethink and revise the current assessment tools in health care education comes in light of ChatGPT’s ability to pass reputable exams (e.g., USMLE) and possibility of ChatGPT misuse, which would result in academic dishonesty [24,34,58,59,62,76,85,86,87].”
From ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns (2023) · cites this paper as [86]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Alberts et al. (2023) emphasized that adversarial testing in medical QA must account for the inherent complexity of the domain, noting that even slight modifications in phrasing can significantly alter clinical interpretations.”
From Trustworthy Medical Question Answering: An Evaluation-Centric Survey (2025) · cites this paper as Alberts et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6572 · Cited by 10,381
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143
BAİDOO-ANU, D., & OWUSU ANSAH, L. (2023) · Journal of AI · doi:10.61969/jai.1337500 · Cited by 3,939
An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success
Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y · Cited by 3,019
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484 · Cited by 3,004
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
Thorp, H. H. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7879 · Cited by 1,437
On Evaluating Adversarial RobustnessPreprint
Carlini, N., Athalye, A., Papernot, N., Brendel, W., Rauber, J., Tsipras, D., Goodfellow, I., Mądry, A., & Kurakin, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.06705 · Cited by 1,066
ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords
Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G., & Moy, L. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.230163 · Cited by 1,008
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z · Cited by 868
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126
Ray, P. P. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · Cited by 2,463
ChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review
Li, J., Dada, A., Puladi, B., Kleesiek, J., & Egger, J. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108013 · Cited by 452
Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?
Currie, G. M. (2023) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008 · Cited by 283
A comprehensive survey of ChatGPT: Advancements, applications, prospects, and challenges
Nazir, A., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100022 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Alberts, I. L., Mercolli, L., Pyka, T., Prenosil, G., Shi, K., Rominger, A., & Afshar-Oromieh, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Alberts, Ian L.
- Venue
- European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Published
- 2023-03-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1549-1552
- ISSN
- 1619-7070 (ISSN-L)
- 1619-7089
- PMC
- PMC9995718
- OpenAlex
- W4323652488
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 36
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- large language models, ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, nuclear medicine
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Nuclear Medicine, Radionuclide Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
