Cited by 87Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

A phase-I trial of the epidermal growth factor receptor directed bispecific antibody MDX-447 without and with recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with advanced solid tumors

Open access
Fury, Matthew G., Lipton, Allan, Smith, Katherine M., Winston, Corinne B., Pfister, David G.·2007·Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy

Abstract

Introduction MDX-447 is a bispecific antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the high affinity Fc receptor (FcgammaRI). Preclinical data suggest that co-administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) may enhance the tumor cytotoxicity of bispecific antibodies.Methods In group 1, patients received MDX-447 intravenously (i.v.) weekly. Dose levels of MDX-447 evaluated in group 1 were 1, 3.5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 mg/m(2). In group 2, patients received MDX-447 IV weekly with G-CSF (3 mcg/kg/day) subcutaneously (days -3 to +2, 5-9, 12-16, etc.). Dose levels of MDX-447 evaluated in group 2 were 1, 3.5, 7, 10, and 15 mg/m(2).Results Sixty-four patients with advanced solid tumors were treated. Forty-one patients received MDX-447 alone (group 1); 23 patients received MDX-447 + G-CSF (group 2). Hypotension was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in both treatment groups, with seven patients experiencing >or= grade 3 events. MDX-447 half-life (T(1/2)) ranged from 1.9 to 8.4 h, with no obvious differences between the two treatment groups. MDX-447 binding to neutrophils and peak levels of circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were higher in group 2. The MTD for MDX-447 alone was 30 mg/m(2). When G-CSF was given with MDX-447, treatment was not well tolerated and group 2 was closed early because of safety concerns, with the last patient being treated at the 7 mg/m(2) dose level. There were no objective complete or partial responses in either group.Conclusion MDX-447 alone was generally well tolerated, but did not achieve objective tumor responses. The MTD for MDX-447 alone was 30 mg/m(2) weekly. Co-administration of G-CSF with MDX-447 precluded meaningful dose escalation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00262-007-0357-5

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chemically linked bispecific (Fab')2 molecules targeting HER2 or EGFR were tested in clinical trials; these antigens are overexpressed in many epithelial tumors such as colorectal, head and neck, bladder, renal, and non-small cell lung carcinoma.

    “A series of clinical trials were also performed with chemically linked bispecific (Fab')2 molecules targeting the breast and ovarian cancer tumor antigens HER2 or EGFR, [9][10][11][12] which are overexpressed in many epithelial tumors such as colorectal, head and neck, bladder, renal, non-small cell lung carcinoma.”
  • Biological effects were seen in some clinical trials of MDX-210, MDX-H210 and MDX-447, but none of these treatments led to consistent antitumor activity.

    “Biological effects were seen in some clinical trials of bsAbs MDX-210 (targeting Her2 and CD64), MDX-H210 (humanized version of MDX-210) and MDX-447 (targeting EGFR and CD64), but none of these treatments led to consistent antitumor activity. [9][10]0][11][12]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fury, M. G., Lipton, A., Smith, K. M., Winston, C. B., & Pfister, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Pfister, David G.
Venue
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
Published
2007-06-30
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
155-163
ISSN
  • 0340-7004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0851
OpenAlex
W2006885022
Cited by
87
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
bispecific antibodies, epidermal growth factor receptor, Fc gamma receptor I, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, advanced solid tumors, dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, TNF-α, interleukin-6, antibody half-life, hypotension
MeSH terms
Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Recombinant Proteins, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Cytokines, Antibodies, Bispecific, Maximum Tolerated Dose, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review