Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: The light at the end of the tunnel?
Open accessAbstract
With 23 approvals in the US and other countries and four approvals outside US, antibodies are now widely recognized as therapeutic molecules. The therapeutic and commercial successes met by rituximab, trastuzumab, cetuximab and other mAbs have inspired antibody engineers to improve the efficacy of these molecules. Consequently, a new wave of antibodies with engineered Fc leading to much higher effector functions such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity or complement-dependent cytotoxicity is being evaluated in the clinic, and several approvals are expected soon. In addition, research on a different class of antibody therapeutics, bispecific antibodies, has recently led to outstanding clinical results, and the first approval of the bispecific antibody catumaxomab, a T cell retargeting agent that was approved in the European Union in April 2009. This review describes the most recent advances and clinical study results in the field of bispecific antibodies, a new class of molecules that might outshine conventional mAbs as cancer immunotherapeutics in a near future.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that after years of disappointing first-generation bispecific antibodies, engineered formats—especially triomabs and BiTEs—finally produced encouraging clinical results in cancer therapy. It highlights catumaxomab’s 2009 European approval for malignant ascites and blinatumomab’s potent T-cell–redirected activity in lymphoma and B-ALL.
Key findings
- First-generation bispecific antibodies (chemical cross-linking or quadromas) showed biological effects but no consistent antitumor activity; HAMA responses limited repeated dosing. HRS-3/A9 produced 1 complete remission and 1 partial remission in 15 patients in one Phase 1 study, then 1 CR and 3 PR in a second trial, but low yield (2.8 g bsAb from 44 g IgG) and high immunogenicity precluded further studies.
- Catumaxomab, an EpCAM x CD3 triomab, was approved by the European Commission in April 2009 for malignant ascites in EpCAM-positive carcinomas. In a Phase 2/3 pivotal study of 258 patients, catumaxomab gave a four-fold increase in puncture-free survival versus paracentesis alone; in a Phase 1/2 study, 22/23 patients did not require paracentesis between the last infusion and day 37, with up to 5-log reduction of EpCAM-positive malignant cells in ascites.
- Blinatumomab, a CD19 x CD3 BiTE, led to elimination of target cells in blood at doses as low as 5 μg/m²/day in relapsed NHL; all seven patients treated at 60 μg experienced tumor regression. In a Phase 2 B-ALL trial, 13/16 evaluable patients (81%) became MRD negative, with ongoing responses up to 47 weeks.
- DNL-based tri-Fabs showed high pretargeting performance: TF2 achieved tumor/blood ratios from 13 at 0.5 h to 395 at 24 h and tumor uptake of 30% ID/g; TF4 improved tumor-to-blood ratio 1,600-fold over a one-step anti-CD20 approach; TF10 gave tumor/blood ratios of 1,000:1 at 3 h versus 5:1 at 24 h for parental anti-MUC-1 IgG.
Methods
- Narrative review of bispecific antibody formats for cancer therapy, focusing on triomabs and BiTEs, with discussion of first-generation bsAbs, recombinant formats, BiTEs, and DNL antibodies.
- Synthesizes preclinical studies and clinical trials (Phase 1, 1/2, 2, and 2/3) reported in the literature up to 2009, including a table of recent clinical trials.
- No systematic search strategy, meta-analysis, or quantitative pooling is described.
Limitations
- The paper states that future randomized trials are needed to determine whether low amounts of bsAb achieve therapeutic effect; for catumaxomab IV Phase 1, survival analysis was not the primary endpoint.
- The paper notes that many bsAb trials were early-phase and small, and that some promising molecules had low production yields or high immunogenicity.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without systematic search or meta-analysis, so format selection and cited evidence may be selective; the 2009 publication date means later clinical developments are not covered.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 83 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation§ First Generation bsAbs: Chemically Cross-Linked Bispecific Antibodies
Early bispecific antibody approaches using chemical cross-linking or hybrid hybridomas/quadromas did not lead to a significant impact in the clinical course of disease despite some biological effects.
“Despite some obvious biological effects, none of these approaches led to a significant impact in the clinical course of disease. 8”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ TriomAbs
Preclinical data for MDX-210 indicated that measurable tumor-cell lysis required high bispecific antibody concentrations (0.1-1 mg.mL-1) and effector-to-target cell ratios of at least 40:1, even when human neutrophils prestimulated with IFNγ and G-CSF were used.
“These results might be explained by preclinical data for MDX-210 indicating that measurable tumor-cell lysis required high bsAb concentrations (0.1-1 mg.mL -1 ) and effector-to-target cell ratios of at least 40:1, even when human neutrophils that had been prestimulated with IFNγ and G-CSF were used. 13”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ TriomAbs
Bispecific antibodies directed against a tumor marker and CD3 have the potential to redirect and activate any circulating T cells against tumors.
“Bispecific antibodies directed against a tumor marker and CD3 have the potential to redirect and activate any circulating T cells against tumors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ TriomAbs
Treatment with bispecific antibodies of the most basic format, chemical cross-linking of full size monoclonal antibodies, yielded some success in clinical studies.
“Surprisingly, treatment with bsAbs of the most basic format, i.e., chemical cross-linking of full size monoclonal antibodies, yielded some success in clinical studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
In animal studies, 100% of mice administered an injection of 4 μg of triomabs survived after intraperitoneal injection of a lethal dose of EpCAM+ melanoma cells.
“In animal studies, 100% of mice administered an injection of 4 μg of triomabs survived after intraperitoneal (IP) injection of a lethal dose of EpCAM + melanoma cells. 25”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ First Generation bsAbs: Chemically Cross-Linked Bispecific Antibodies
The potential of using bispecific antibodies to retarget effector cells toward tumor cells was demonstrated in the 1980s.
“The potential of using bispecific antibodies to retarget effector cells toward tumor cells was demonstrated in the 1980s 3,6,7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premiseown data§ TriomAbs
The low production yield and high immunogenicity of HRS-3/A9 precluded further clinical studies.
“However, the low production yield (2.8 g of bsAb obtained from 44 g of IgG) and the high immunogenicity of this bsAb precluded further clinical studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Introduction
Many monoclonal antibody shortcomings could be overcome by creating bispecific antibodies capable of simultaneous binding to two different targets.
“many mAb shortcomings could be overcome by creating bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) capable of simultaneous binding to two different targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ TriomAbs
HRS-3/A9 was the first instance of bispecific antibody treatment leading to a complete remission.
“The construct was the first instance of bsAb treatment leading to a complete remission.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy
A Phase 1/2 clinical trial using Her2Bi-armed activated T cells for breast cancer and prostate cancer resulted in partial responses persisting for two months following completion.
“A Phase 1/2 clinical trial using Her2Bi (OKT3 x trastuzumab)-armed activated T cells for the treatment of breast cancer and prostate cancer has resulted in partial responses persisting for two months following completion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
TGN1412, a monospecific superagonistic CD28 antibody, induced systemic T-cell activation and severe cytokine release syndrome when injected into six healthy volunteers.
“However, in March 2006, TGN1412, a monospecific 'superagonistic' CD28 antibody induced systemic T-cell activation and severe cytokine release syndrome when injected into six healthy volunteers, 42”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
In a pilot study, all alemtuzumab- and rituximab-refractory patients with recurrent B cell malignancies, CLL or highly malignant lymphoma after allo-stem cell transplantation showed a prompt but transient clinical and hematological response to Bi20.
“In a pilot study, Bi20 was administered to six patients with recurrent B cell malignancies, CLL or highly malignant lymphoma after allo-stem cell transplantation.All alemtuzumab-and rituximab-refractory patients showed a prompt but transient clinical and hematological response, highlighting the high therapeutic potential of this triomab.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
Patients receiving catumaxomab had a four-fold increase in puncture-free survival compared to those receiving paracentesis therapy only.
“Patients receiving catumaxomab had a four-fold increase in puncture-free survival compared to those receiving paracentesis therapy only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
rM28 is a bispecific tandem molecule targeting the co-stimulatory molecule CD28 expressed on T cells and NG2, a melanoma-associated proteoglycan.
“One atypical molecule was rM28, a bispecific tandem molecule targeting the co-stimulatory molecule CD28 expressed on T cells and NG2, a melanoma-associated proteoglycan.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
In 1995, Kufer and collaborators produced a tandem scFv targeting EpCAM and human CD3 in CHO cells.
“In 1995, Kufer and collaborators produced such a tandem scFv targeting EpCAM (epithelial 17-1A antigen) and human CD3 in CHO cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
The effective mode of action of rM28 was extended to cytolysis of lymphoma cells using an anti-CD28 x CD20 bispecific tandem scFv with supra-agonistic properties.
“This effective mode of action was recently extended to the cytolysis of lymphoma cells using an anti-CD28 x CD20 bispecific tandem scFv endowed with the same supra-agonistic properties. 41”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
A fundamental difference exists between TGN1412 and bispecific molecules such as rM28.
“However, it should be noted that a fundamental difference exists between TGN1412 and bispecific molecules such as rM28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Ertumaxomab (Rexomun ® )
In an early clinical trial of patients with malignant ascites due to peritoneal carcinomatosis, administration of total doses of ertumaxomab as low as 40-140 μg led to complete elimination of tumor cells in ascites and disappearance of ascites accumulation in all patients.
“In an early clinical trial of patients with malignant ascites due to peritoneal carcinomatosis, administration of total doses of ertumaxomab as low as 40-140 μg lead to a complete elimination of tumor cells in ascites, and disappearance of ascites accumulation in all patients. 29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
An anti-EGFR x CD3 diabody was able to cure xenografted mice in combination with lymphokine activated killer cells.
“a promising anti-EGFR x CD3 diabody able to cure xenografted mice in combination with lymphokine activated killer cells, 38”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Bi20 (Lymphomun TM or fBTA05)
In vitro, Bi20 mediated efficient and specific lysis of B cell lines and B cells with low CD20 expression levels derived from chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.
“In vitro, Bi20 was shown to mediate an efficient and specific lysis of B cell lines and B cells with low CD20 expression levels that were derived from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. 31”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
Tumor cell monitoring revealed a reduction of EpCAM-positive malignant cells in ascites by up to 5 logs.
“Tumor cell monitoring revealed a reduction of EpCAM-positive malignant cells in ascites by up to 5 logs. 26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
Numerous studies have demonstrated the potency of these formats in preclinical studies.
“Numerous studies have demonstrated the potency of these formats in preclinical studies. 36”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Muller D, 2007, Curr Opin Mol Ther
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
This new kind of bispecific antibody proved highly cytotoxic at nanomolar concentrations against various cell lines, using unstimulated human PBMCs in the absence of co-signaling.
“This new kind of bsAb proved to be highly cytotoxic at nanomolar concentrations against various cell lines, using unstimulated human PBMCs in the absence of co-signaling. 44”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
Unlike TGN1412, supra-agonistic CD28 stimulation by rM28 was strictly target-cell restricted over a wide concentration range, i.e., not induced if NG2-expressing target cells are absent.
“Indeed, unlike the activity of TGN1412, supra-agonistic CD28 stimulation by rM28 was shown to be strictly target-cell restricted over a wide concentration range, i.e., not induced if NG2-expressing target cells are absent. 43”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
The high immunogenicity of the rat/mouse hybrid molecule did not constitute a major issue.
“It is also interesting to note that the high immunogenicity of this rat/mouse hybrid molecule did not constitute a major issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
The lack of effect of immunogenicity is probably due to the extremely small amounts administered to patients (around 100 μg).
“This is probably due to the extremely small amounts administered to the patients (around 100 μg”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
A large international Phase 2/3 pivotal study involving 258 patients demonstrated a statistically significant improvement of the primary endpoint, puncture-free survival.
“By early 2009, the results of a large international Phase 2/3 pivotal study involving 258 patients demonstrated a statistically significant improvement of the primary endpoint, puncture-free survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
An anti-PSMA x CD3 diabody with peripheral blood lymphocytes efficiently treated xenografted mice bearing prostate cancer cell induced tumors.
“and the efficient treatment of xenografted mice bearing prostate cancer cell induced tumors using an anti-PSMA x CD3 diabody and peripheral blood lymphocytes. 39”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
In a Phase 1/2 clinical trial, 22/23 ovarian cancer patients with malignant ascites treated with intraperitoneal triomab did not require paracentesis between the last infusion and the end of study at day 37.
“In a Phase 1/2 clinical trial, patients in ovarian cancer patients with malignant ascites were treated with IP administration of triomab (4 to 5 doses of 5 to 200 μg); 22/23 patients did not require paracentesis between the last infusion and the end of study at day 37.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )
The target-cell restriction of rM28 should in principle avoid side effects such as those observed after TGN1412 administration.
“This, in principle, should avoid side effects such as those observed after TGN1412 administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbs
All seven patients treated at a dose level of 60 μg experienced tumor regression.
“All seven patients treated at a dose level of 60 μg experienced a tumor regression. 54”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
BiTEs do not require any kind of pre- or co-stimulation of effector T cells.
“The most impressive property of this class of molecules, beside the absence of requirement for any kind of pre or co stimulation of effector T cells, is the low concentration required to achieve anti-tumor activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
BiTEs induce immunological cytolytic synapses identical to synapses induced by regular T cell stimuli, even in the absence of MHC class I molecules.
“BiTEs have been demonstrated to induce immunological cytolytic synapses identical to synapses induced by regular T cell stimuli, 49 even in the absence of MHC class I molecules, as shown by the lysis of EpCAM-expressing K562 cells or transfected rodent cells expressing the target antigen by human effector cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ DNL Antibodies for Radioimmunotherapy
The DNL method relies on the spontaneous association of a dimer of the 45 amino acids peptide DDD2 with the 21 residues peptide AD2.
“It relies on the spontaneous association of a dimer of the 45 amino acids peptide DDD2, derived from the regulatory subunit of human cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) with the 21 residues peptide AD2, derived from the anchoring domains (AD) of human A kinase anchor proteins (AKAPs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
BiTEs have a small size of 60 kDa that ensures close proximity of T cells and target cell membranes.
“The small size (60 kDa) of BiTEs, which ensures close proximity of T cells and target cell membranes, might therefore be responsible for their high efficiency by leading to the active displacement of negative regulatory proteins from the forming synapse, as demonstrated in the case of CD45. 47”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
BiTEs mediate serial killing of many target cells.
“This suggests that BiTEs mediate serial killing of many target cells, and this was actually demonstrated using video assisted microscopy. 16”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ TF2
Preclinical data from studies with muS110 demonstrated that EpCAM-specific BiTE antibodies can effectively discriminate between target antigen expressed on tumor and normal epithelial tissue.
“Preclinical data from studies with muS110, a BiTE surrogate targeting murine EpCAM and murine CD3 demonstrated that EpCAM-specific BiTE antibodies can effectively discriminate between target antigen expressed on tumor and normal epithelial tissue. 57”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbs
First results from an ongoing Phase 2 trial in B-ALL indicate that T cells engaged by blinatumomab are able to locate and eradicate rare disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow that can only be detected by quantitative PCR assays.
“The first results from an ongoing Phase 2 trial in patients with B-ALL indicate that T cells engaged by blinatumomab are able to locate and eradicate rare disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow that can only be detected by quantitative PCR assays detecting tumor cell-specific genomic aberrations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ TF2
MT110 was active against human ovarian metastatic tissues grafted in immunodeficient mice in the absence of human peripheral mononuclear cells.
“MT110 was also active against human ovarian metastatic tissues grafted in immunodeficient mice in the absence of human peripheral mononuclear cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ TF2
The combination of bsAb-enabled pretargeting approaches and 177Lu might have a high therapeutic potential.
“Thus, the combination of bsAb-enabled pretargeting approaches and this radionuclide might have a high therapeutic potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The emitted beta radiation of 177Lu with a maximum energy of 498 keV is effective in destroying small tumors and metastasis while sparing normal tissue.
- Rests on an assumption: 177Lu gamma rays are of low energy (113 and 208 keV) and abundance (7 and 11%), which simplifies radiation protection and patient-handling issues.
- Premisecitation§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbs
In preclinical trials, Dreier et al. demonstrated that submicrogram amounts of blinatumomab were sufficient to prevent tumor growth in a mouse model.
“In preclinical trials, Dreier et al. demonstrated that submicrogram amounts of this molecule were sufficient to prevent tumor growth in a mouse model. 52”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbs
By mere interaction between CD3 and a target antigen via a BiTE molecule, in the absence of MHC class I/TCR interaction, BiTEs have the potential to overcome many tumor cell escape mechanisms such as MHC class I, proteasome and TAP1/2 downregulation.
“by a mere interaction between CD3 and a target antigen via a BiTE molecule, in the absence of MHC class I/TCR interaction, has the potential to overcome many tumor cell escape mechanisms such as MHC class I, proteasome and intracellular peptide transporter (TAP1 and 2) downregulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
Most tumor cell lines can be lysed in the presence of 0.2 to 2 pM of BiTEs for half maximal target cell lysis.
“Indeed, most tumor cell lines can be lysed in the presence of 0.2 to 2 pM of BiTEs for half maximal target cell lysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
A low two digit number of BiTEs bound between T and target cells is sufficient to induce lysis.
“suggesting that a low two digit number of BiTEs bound between T and target cells is sufficient to induce lysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ TF2
In NOD/SCID mice, as little as 100 ng of MT110 can prevent tumor outgrowth after injection of a 1:1 ratio of human colon carcinoma cells mixed with unstimulated human peripheral mononuclear cells.
“A study in NOD/SCID mice demonstrated that as little as 100 ng of MT110 can prevent tumor outgrowth after an injection of a 1:1 ratio of human colon carcinoma cells mixed with unstimulated human peripheral mononuclear cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
The small size of BiTEs might be responsible for their high efficiency by leading to the active displacement of negative regulatory proteins from the forming synapse.
“The small size (60 kDa) of BiTEs, which ensures close proximity of T cells and target cell membranes, might therefore be responsible for their high efficiency by leading to the active displacement of negative regulatory proteins from the forming synapse, as demonstrated in the case of CD45. 47”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbs
In 2008, the first result of a Phase 1 clinical study indicated that doses as low as 5 μg per square meter per day in relapsed NHL patients led to elimination of target cells in blood.
“In 2008, the first result of a Phase 1 clinical study indicated that doses as low as 5 μg per square meter per day in relapsed NHL patients led to an elimination of target cells in blood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
These results were in marked contrast with the majority of published studies based on anti-CD3 bispecific constructs.
“These results were in marked contrast with the majority of published studies based on anti-CD3 bispecific constructs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Other BiTEs in the Pipeline
MT111/MEDI-565 targets CEA, a widely expressed tumor antigen highly expressed in colorectal cancer and also in a substantial proportion of carcinomas of the lung, pancreas, stomach, ovary, uterus, breast and a subset of melanomas.
“MT111/MEDI-565 targets the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, also called CEACAM5), a widely expressed tumor antigen highly expressed in colorectal cancer, and also in a substantial proportion of carcinomas of the lung, pancreas, stomach, ovary, uterus, breast and a subset of melanomas. 58”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
In some cases, up to 18 fM of BiTEs was shown to be enough to induce in vitro cell lysis.
“In some cases, up to 18 fM was shown to be enough to induce in vitro cell lysis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ TF2
In vitro characterizations of MT110 recapitulated the results obtained with MT103 on tumor cell lines, demonstrating the generality of the BiTE format.
“In vitro characterizations of MT110 have recapitulated the results obtained with MT103 on tumor cell lines, thereby demonstrating the generality of the BiTE format. 55”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell Engagers
BiTEs are capable of inducing efficient lysis at effector to target ratios as low as 1:10.
“Moreover, BiTEs are capable of inducing efficient lysis at effector to target ratios (E:T) as low as 1:10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Other DNL Based bsAbs in the Pipeline
In xenografted nude mice, TF4 as a pretargeting agent of 111In-HSG-peptide compared with a one-step approach using parental anti-CD20 mAb hA20 directly labeled with 90Y demonstrated a 1,600-fold improvement of tumor-to-blood ratio and a 1.6-fold improvement of tumor uptake.
“Studies performed in xenografted nude mice that compared TF4 as a pretargeting agent of an 111 In-HSG-peptide with a one step approach using the parental anti-CD20 mAb (hA20) directly labeled with 90 Y demonstrated an impressive 1,600-fold improvement of the tumor-to-blood ratio, as well as a 1.6-fold improvement of tumor uptake. 63”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Other BiTEs in the Pipeline
Soluble CEA might interfere with antibody based therapies.
“This soluble CEA (sCEA) might therefore interfere with antibody based therapies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CEA can be shed by phospholipases from the cell surface through cleavage of its glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linkage, causing release into the circulation.
- Premisecitation§ Other BiTEs in the Pipeline
Lutterbuese et al. found that the cytotoxic activity of some anti-CEA x anti-CD3 BiTEs was not competitively inhibited by sCEA at concentrations exceeding levels found in the serum of most cancer patients.
“Lutterbuese et al. compared the activity of several anti-CEA x anti-CD3 BiTE in the absence or presence of sCEA, and found that the cytotoxic activity of some of these molecules was not competitively inhibited by sCEA at concentrations that exceeded levels found in the serum of most cancer patients. 59”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: CEA can be shed by phospholipases from the cell surface through cleavage of its glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linkage, causing release into the circulation.
- Premisecitation§ Other BiTEs in the Pipeline
Both CD33- and MCSP-specific human BiTEs have been investigated in studies with macaque monkeys validating these new molecules in terms of efficacy and safety.
“Both BiTEs have already been investigated in studies with macaque monkeys that have validating these new molecules, both in terms of efficacy and safety. 60”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Kischel R, 2008, Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 50
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ TriomAbsHuman anti-mouse antibody responses were seen in most treated patients, severely decreased the efficacy of murine molecules, and excluded the possibility of multiple administrations.
“Human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) responses were seen in most treated patients, which severely decreased the efficacy of the murine molecules and excluded the possibility of multiple administrations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ IntroductionBispecific antibodies are capable of retargeting a large variety of payloads to cancer cells.
“Such molecules would be capable of retargeting a large variety of payloads to cancer cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapyThe PACT approach avoids direct systemic injection of bispecific antibody in the patient, thereby significantly minimizing toxicity associated with free murine Fc bearing molecules.
“This approach has the advantage of avoiding a direct systemic injection of bsAb in the patient, thereby significantly minimizing toxicity associated with free murine Fc bearing molecules. 19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ TriomAbsThe hybrid Fc adds two crucial functions to regular anti-CD3 x target bispecific antibodies: additive tumor killing through efficient recruitment of macrophages and NK cells, and efficient co-stimulation of T cells through direct contact with accessory cells.
“In short, this Fc adds two crucial functions to regular anti-CD3 x target bsAbs: additive tumor killing capabilities through the efficient recruitment of macrophages and NK cells and, most importantly, efficient co-stimulation of T cells through direct contact with accessory cells such as macrophages of efficacy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )EpCAM is very often on cancer stem cells, a very attractive feature for a tumor marker.
“Moreover, EpCAM is very often on cancer stem cells, a very attractive feature for a tumor marker. 24”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsTwo Phase 1 clinical studies of HRS-3/A9 led to one complete remission and one partial remission in 15 treated patients; a second trial led to one complete remission and three partial remissions.
“Two Phase 1 clinical studies performed with this molecule led to one complete remission (CR) and one partial remission (PR) in a group of 15 treated patients; 14 this was followed by one CR and three PR in a second clinical trial. 15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [14] Hartmann F, 1997, Blood source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Hartmann F, 2001, Clin Cancer Res
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )EpCAM is also expressed in normal cells, but is predominantly located in intercellular spaces where epithelial cells form very tight junctions.
“EpCAM is also expressed in normal cells, but is predominantly located in intercellular spaces where epithelial cells form very tight junctions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ First Generation bsAbs: Chemically Cross-Linked Bispecific AntibodiesFirst generation bispecific antibodies had two major limitations: difficulty producing large homogeneous batches and lack of efficacy of murine antibody fragments.
“The first studies of bsAbs highlighted two major limitations of the first generation molecules, including the difficulty of producing large, homogeneous batches, and the lack”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ TriomAbsThe second specificity of these bispecific antibodies was directed against FcγRI (CD64), which is expressed on monocytes and macrophages and upregulated upon activation on neutrophils.
“The second specificity of these bsAbs was directed against FcγRI (CD64), which is notably expressed on monocytes and macrophages and upregulated upon activation on neutrophils.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsT cells are abundant, efficiently proliferate upon activation, are capable of killing multiple times, and efficiently infiltrate tumors, but do not express Fcγ receptors.
“They are abundant, efficiently proliferate upon activation, capable of killing multiple times 16 and efficiently infiltrate tumors, but do not express Fcγ receptors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsChemically linked bispecific (Fab')2 molecules targeting HER2 or EGFR were tested in clinical trials; these antigens are overexpressed in many epithelial tumors such as colorectal, head and neck, bladder, renal, and non-small cell lung carcinoma.
“A series of clinical trials were also performed with chemically linked bispecific (Fab')2 molecules targeting the breast and ovarian cancer tumor antigens HER2 or EGFR, [9][10][11][12] which are overexpressed in many epithelial tumors such as colorectal, head and neck, bladder, renal, non-small cell lung carcinoma.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )EpCAM is expressed on essentially all human adenocarcinoma, certain squamous cell carcinoma, retinoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.
“EpCAM (CD326) is expressed on essentially all human adenocarcinoma, certain squamous cell carcinoma, retinoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsThe hybrid rat/mouse Fc portion efficiently interacted with activating human Fc receptors FcγRI and FcγRIII, but not with inhibitory FcγRIIB.
“Surprisingly, the resulting hybrid rat/mouse Fc portion efficiently interacted with activating human Fc receptors (FcγRI and FcγRIII), but not inhibitory ones (FcγRIIB), thereby reaching the goal that other groups had hoped to achieve using human Fc engineering. 22,23”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsBiological effects were seen in some clinical trials of MDX-210, MDX-H210 and MDX-447, but none of these treatments led to consistent antitumor activity.
“Biological effects were seen in some clinical trials of bsAbs MDX-210 (targeting Her2 and CD64), MDX-H210 (humanized version of MDX-210) and MDX-447 (targeting EGFR and CD64), but none of these treatments led to consistent antitumor activity. [9][10]0][11][12]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsThe first anti-CD3 bispecific antibodies were administered in combination with anti-CD28 antibodies, but the combination yielded mixed results.
“The first anti-CD3 bsAbs were thus administered in combination with anti-CD28 antibodies, but the combination yielded mixed results. 18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapyBispecific antibody-retargeted PACTs can divide and secrete cytokines upon restimulation with target cells, while retaining their specificity and cytotoxicity for more than two weeks.
“Interestingly, it was shown that bsAb-retargeted PACTs can divide and secrete cytokines upon restimulation with target cells, while retaining their specificity and cytotoxicity for more than two weeks, which might be an important feature for therapeutic settings. 20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )Catumaxomab targets the tumor antigen EpCAM and was the first triomab produced.
“Catumaxomab, which targets the tumor antigen EpCAM, was the first triomab produced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsWithout the secondary signal given by the interaction between CD28 and one of its ligands such as B7, T cells are not fully activated and might become anergic.
“Without the secondary signal given by the interaction between CD28 and one of its ligands (e.g., B7), T cells are not fully activated, and might even become anergic. 17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsAn anti-CD3 x anti-EpCAM bispecific antibody created with this approach was capable of binding target cells and human T cells, activating dendritic cells, inducing NK-dependent ADCC, and stimulating tumor cell phagocytosis by macrophages.
“The investigators used this approach to create an anti-CD3 x anti-EpCAM bsAb, and demonstrated that this antibody was capable of binding to target cells and human T cells, but was also capable of activating dendritic cells (DC), inducing NK-dependent ADCC and stimulating tumor cell phagocytosis by macrophages. 22,23”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ IntroductionMonoclonal antibody modes of action have major limitations, including redundancy of molecular pathways leading to cancer cell survival, effects of the microenvironment, suboptimal interaction with effector cells due to alternative Fc glycosylation or Fc receptor polymorphism, activation of inhibitory receptors, and competition with circulating IgG.
“limitations in their modes of action, including redundancy of molecular pathways leading to cancer cell survival, effects of the microenvironment, suboptimal interaction with effector cells due to alternative Fc glycosylation or Fc receptor polymorphism, activation of inhibitory receptors, and competition with circulating IgG. 2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TriomAbsUsing an original subclass combination of mouse IgG2a and rat IgG2b, Lindhofer and collaborators demonstrated preferential species-restricted heavy/light chain pairing, in contrast to random pairing in conventional quadromas, and sequential pH elution on protein A to separate the desired bispecific antibody from parental monoclonal antibody.
“By using an original subclass combination (mouse IgG2a and rat IgG2b), they demonstrated a preferential speciesrestricted heavy/light chain pairing, in contrast to the random pairing in conventional mouse/mouse or rat/rat quadromas, as well as use of sequential pH elution on protein A to easily separate the desired bsAb from the parental mAb.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Lindhofer H, 1995, J Immunol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )Although difficult to produce in E. coli, the 60 kDa TaFv molecule is well-expressed by mammalian cells.
“Although difficult to produce in E. coli, this 60 kDa molecule is well-expressed by mammalian cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )Below the maximum tolerated dose (200 μg), side effects including fever, nausea and vomiting were predictable, limited, manageable and mostly fully transient.
“Below the maximum tolerated dose (200 μg), side effects, including fever, nausea and vomiting, were predictable, limited, manageable and mostly fully transient. 27”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Parsons S, 2009, J Clin Oncol
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )Rituximab demonstrated a significantly lower B cell eradication rate compared to Bi20.
“In comparison, rituximab demonstrated a significantly lower B cell eradication rate. 31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )The antitumor effect was dependent on the presence of the hybrid Fc and involved a humoral response directed against non-transfected (EPCAM-) tumor cells.
“This effect was dependent on the presence of the hybrid Fc, and involved a humoral response directed against the non-transfected (EPCAM -) tumor cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Ertumaxomab (Rexomun ® )Ertumaxomab possesses the same hybrid Fc portion as catumaxomab and displays the same efficiency in vitro.
“This triomab possesses the same hybrid Fc portion as catumaxomab, and displays the same efficiency in vitro. 29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )All mice rechallenged on day 144 after the primary challenge were still able to reject the tumor, indicating high efficacy and long duration of the antitumor response.
“All mice rechallenged on day 144 after the primary challenge were still able to reject the tumor, indicating the high efficacy and long duration of the antitumor response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )No bispecific diabodies have been tested in clinical trials.
“Surprisingly, no bispecific diabodies have been tested so far in clinical trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsAdvances in antibody engineering allowed production of small antibody fragments recapitulating the entire binding activity of the parent molecule.
“In the nineties, advances in antibody engineering provided innovative solutions antibody design problems, allowing production of small antibody fragments recapitulating the entire binding activity of the parent molecule (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )Diabodies can be expressed at high yields in bacteria and have been shown by crystallography to adopt several conformations.
“These molecules can be expressed at high yields in bacteria and have been shown by crystallography experiments to adopt several conformations. 35”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )Moderate anti mouse and anti rat responses were seen in the majority of patients but do not seem to affect the efficiency of the treatment.
“Moderate anti mouse and anti rat responses were seen in the majority of the patients but they do not seem to affect the efficiency of the treatment. 26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )Tandem scFvs (TaFv) are two scFv fragments linked by an extra peptide linker that is expected to confer good flexibility to each fragment.
“Tandem scFvs (TaFv) are two scFv fragments linked by an extra peptide linker that is expected to confer good flexibility to each fragment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Bi20 (Lymphomun TM or fBTA05)CD20 is expressed on all stages of B cell development from pre-B cells through memory cells, but not on pro-B cells or plasma cells, making it an attractive target for the treatment of B cell malignancies.
“Expressed on all stages of B cell development from pre-B cells through memory cells, but not on either pro-B cells or plasma cells, CD20 represents an attractive target for the treatment of B cell malignancies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )Two other triomabs targeting melanoma-associated proteoglycans or melanoma-associated gangliosides (GD2 and GD3) are in preclinical studies as potential treatments for malignant melanoma.
“f note, two other triomabs, targeting melanoma-associated proteoglycans or melanoma-associated gangliosides (GD2 and GD3), 33 are in preclinical studies as potential treatments for malignant melanoma.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )T cell activation and tumor cell killing occurred in an entirely autologous setting, without additional effector cells, in 5 of 8 samples.
“T cell activation and tumor cell killing occurred in an entirely autologous setting, i.e., without additional effector cells, in 5 of 8 samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Ertumaxomab (Rexomun ® )The difference between ertumaxomab and trastuzumab can probably be explained by their modes of action: trastuzumab triggers NK-mediated ADCC, while ertumaxomab relies on T cell mediated killing and interaction between T cells and accessory cells, as demonstrated by release of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, IFNγ and TNFα.
“This difference can probably be explained by the mode of action of these antibodies.Trastuzumab triggers NK-mediated ADCC, while ertumaxomab relies on T cell mediated killing and the interaction between T cells and accessory cells, as demonstrated by the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IFNγ and TNFα.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Ertumaxomab (Rexomun ® )Exposure to ertumaxomab led to efficient lysis of cells expressing very low amount of tumor antigen, whereas trastuzumab was completely ineffective even at high concentration.
“Exposure to ertumaxomab led to the efficient lysis of cells expressing very low amount of tumor antigen, whereas trastuzumab was completely ineffective even at high concentration. 30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Catumaxomab (Removab ® )rM28 spontaneously forms stable dimers and can induce T-cell activation and effective tumor-cell killing in vitro and in vivo without a signal through the TCR/CD3 complex.
“This molecule spontaneously forms stable dimers, and was shown to be capable of inducing T-cell activation and effective tumor-cell killing in vitro and in vivo without a signal through the TCR/CD3 complex, a so called”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Ertumaxomab (Rexomun ® )Ertumaxomab is a triomab targeting HER2, a well-characterized breast tumor marker that is also targeted by trastuzumab.
“Ertumaxomab is triomab targeting HER2, a well-characterized breast tumor marker that is also targeted by trastuzumab (Herceptin).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell EngagersBiTEs are made by fusing an anti-CD3 scFv to an anti-TAA scFv via a short five residue peptide linker (GGGGS).
“BiTEs, or bispecific T cell Engagers, are made by fusing an anti-CD3 scFv to an anti-TAA scFv via a short five residue peptide linker (GGGGS).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell EngagersThis molecule demonstrated efficient cytotoxicity induced by extremely low concentrations (10-50 pg.mL-1, subpicomolar), at low effector:target ratio (2:1), in only four hours, without need for pre-stimulation of T cells or co-signaling.
“This molecule demonstrated outstanding in vitro properties, including efficient cytotoxicity induced by extremely low concentrations of bsAb (10-50 pg.mL -1 , i.e., subpicomolar), at low effector:target ratio (2:1), and in only four hours, without the need for pre-stimulation of T cells or, most surprisingly, the need of co-signaling (e.g., through CD28).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Loffler A, 2000, Blood source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Bi20 (Lymphomun TM or fBTA05)Bi20 triomab utilizes the same hybrid Fc portion as catumaxomab and ertumaxomab, and targets CD20.
“Bi20 triomab utilizes the same hybrid Fc portion as catumaxomab and ertumaxomab, and targets CD20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsCumulative doses of several milligrams of blinatumomab were sufficient to lead to notable response in patients, whereas conventional antibody treatments such as rituximab consume gram amounts per treatment cycle.
“It should be highlighted that cumulative doses of several milligrams were sufficient to lead to the notable response in patients, whereas conventional antibody treatments, such as rituximab, consume gram amounts per treatment cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TF2In xenografted nude mice, TF2 produced exceptionally high tumor blood ratios ranging from 13 at 0.5 h to 395 at 24 h, with high tumor uptake of 30% ID/g, whereas levels in blood and normal tissues except kidney were <1% ID/g at 1 h after injection.
“Exceptionally high tumor blood ratios were observed, ranging from 13 at 0.5 h to 395 at 24 h, with high tumor uptake of 30% ID/g, whereas the levels in blood and normal tissues, except kidney, were <1% ID/g at 1 h after injection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsBlinatumomab, a murine anti-human CD3 x anti-human CD19, was the first BiTE developed and is the most advanced BiTE in clinical trials.
“Blinatumomab, a murine antihuman CD3 x anti-human CD19 was the first BiTE developed and is the most advanced BiTE in clinical trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsAmong all T cell subtypes, CD8+ effector memory CD45RO+ (TEM) and CD8+ effector memory CD45RA+ (TEMRA) contribute the most to BiTE activity, whereas naïve T cells do not contribute at all to killing efficiency.
“The absence of a need for co-signaling through CD28 for these BiTEs might also be explained by the observation that among all T cell subtypes, CD8 + effector memory cells CD45RO + (TEM) and CD8 + effector memory CD45RA + (TEMRA) contribute the most to BiTE activity, whereas naïve T cells do not contribute at all to the killing efficiency. 50”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsMT110, an anti-human EpCAM x anti-human CD3 TaFv, was the second BiTE tested in clinical trial.
“MT110, an anti-human EpCAM x anti-human CD3 TaFv, was the second BiTE tested in clinical trial and the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsMRD positive ALL patients have very limited treatment options, and around 60% of patients die within 2 years, with a median time to hematological relapse of only 4.1 months.
“This result is remarkable since MRD positive ALL patients have very limited treatment options, and around 60% of patients die within 2 years, with a median time to hematological relapse of only 4.1 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ TF2Since MT110 does not activate murine T cells, tumor resident human T cells, being tolerized or anergized, could be reactivated and were present in sufficient number to eliminate the xenograft.
“Since MT110 does not activate murine T cells, this result suggests that tumor resident human T cells, being tolerized or anergized, could be reactivated, and were present in sufficient number to eliminate the xenograft. 56”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: MT110 does not activate murine T cells.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown data§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsThirteen out of 16 evaluable patients (81%) became MRD negative, with ongoing responses lasting for up to 47 weeks on May 25 2009.
“Thirteen out of 16 evaluable patients (81%) became minimum residual disease (MRD) negative, with ongoing responses lasting for up to 47 weeks on May the 25 th 2009 (data presented in Recombinant Antibodies meeting, June 2009, Cologne).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BiTEs: Bispecific T Cell EngagersKilling by BiTEs remains strictly target-cell dependent, and T cells cannot be activated in the absence of target cells, even at concentrations exceeding EC50 values by several thousand fold.
“Despite this extreme efficiency, the killing remains strictly target-cell dependent, and T cells cannot be activated in the absence of target cells, even at concentrations exceeding EC 50 values by several thousand fold. 48”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsThe Phase 2 trial of blinatumomab in B-ALL was associated with significantly reduced toxicity compared to NHL patients at the same dose level, suggesting toxicity might be correlated to the number of target cells present in patients, rather than to the BiTE molecule itself.
“Interestingly, this trial was associated with significantly reduced toxicity compared to NHL patients at the same dose level, suggesting that toxicity might be correlated to the number of target cells present in patients, rather than to the BiTE molecule itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DNL Antibodies for RadioimmunotherapyUpon association, two disulfide bonds are created, resulting in a covalent complex that is stable for more than a week at 37°C in human serum.
“Upon association, two disulfide bonds are created, resulting in a covalent complex that is stable for more than a week at 37°C in human serum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TF2TF2 is a 157 kDa bsAb built using the DNL method, devoid of Fc fragment, comprising two Fab fragments derived from humanized anti-human CEA mAb hMN-14 and one Fab fragment from humanized mAb h679 that strongly binds the hapten HSG.
“The first described bsAb built using the DNL method was a molecule of 157 kDa, devoid of Fc fragment, comprising two Fab fragments derived from humanized anti-human CEA mAb hMN-14 and one Fab fragment from humanized mAb h679 that is able to strongly bind the hapten histamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DNL Antibodies for RadioimmunotherapyDNL can be used to efficiently create any kind of bsAb, but was so far used to create bispecific molecules dedicated to radioimmunotherapy.
“This can be used to efficiently create any kind of bsAb, but was so far used to create bispecific molecules dedicated to radioimmunotherapy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsStudies in chimpanzees showed repeated 2 h treatments with doses as low as 0.1 μg.kg-1 were well-tolerated and led to cumulative depletion of peripheral B cells due to fully reversible T cell activation.
“Later, studies performed in chimpanzees showed that repeated 2 h treatments with doses as low as 0.1 μg.kg -1 were welltolerated, and led to cumulative depletion of peripheral B cells due to fully reversible T cell activation. 53”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The New Generation: Recombinant bsAbsBecause of its small size (60 kDa), blinatumomab has a short serum half life of several hours, requiring continuous intravenous infusion by portable mini-pumps.
“Because of its small size (60 kDa), blinatumomab is characterized by a short serum half life of several hours, and so continuous intravenous infusion by portable mini-pumps is required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Other DNL Based bsAbs in the PipelineTF4 is a second bsAb built using the DNL method, directed against CD20 for the treatment of NHL.
“TF4 is a second bsAb built using the DNL method, directed against CD20 for the treatment of NHL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Other DNL Based bsAbs in the PipelinePAM-4, the parental anti-MUC-1 antibody, binds a MUC1 epitope that is not detected in normal pancreas but is expressed in 87% of invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas, including early stage 1 disease.
“PAM-4, the parental anti-MUC-1 antibody has been shown to bind a MUC1 epitope that is not detected in normal pancreas but is expressed in 87% of invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas, including early stage 1 disease. 64”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cytotoxic T cells are the most potent killer cells of the immune system.
“Cytotoxic T cells are considered the most potent killer cells of the immune system.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EpCAM is sequestered on epithelia and thus much less accessible to antibodies compared to EpCAM in cancer tissue, where it is homogeneously distributed on the cancer cell surface.
“It is thought that EpCAM is sequestered on epithelia, and thus much less accessible to antibodies compared to EpCAM in cancer tissue, where it is homogeneously distributed on the cancer cell surface.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Memory T cells do not require CD28 costimulation for expansion during secondary responses.
“It is believed that memory T cells do not require CD28 costimulation for expansion during secondary responses, which could explain the efficiency of BiTEs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
None of the approved monoclonal antibodies are able to cure cancer as single agents.
“Unfortunately, none of them are able to cure cancer as single agents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
BiTE molecules targeting EpCAM expressed on solid tumors of epithelial origin that do not express B7 show similar efficacy.
“However, BiTE molecules targeting EpCAM expressed on a variety of solid tumor of epithelial origin that do not express B7 show similar efficacy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CEA can be shed by phospholipases from the cell surface through cleavage of its glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linkage, causing release into the circulation.
“However, CEA can be shed by phospholipases from the cell surface through cleavage of its glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linkage, which causes the protein to be released in the circulation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The emitted beta radiation of 177Lu with a maximum energy of 498 keV is effective in destroying small tumors and metastasis while sparing normal tissue.
“Furthermore, the emitted β radiation with a maximum energy of 498 keV is effective in destroying small tumors and metastasis while sparing normal tissue”
The paper relies on this without support.
177Lu gamma rays are of low energy (113 and 208 keV) and abundance (7 and 11%), which simplifies radiation protection and patient-handling issues.
“and its γ-rays are of low energy (113 and 208 keV) and abundance (7 and 11%), which simplifies radiation protection and patient-handling issues.”
The paper relies on this without support.
MT110 does not activate murine T cells.
“Since MT110 does not activate murine T cells”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One of the most active areas of bsAbs application is in the field of cancer immunotherapy.
“One of the most active areas of bsAbs application is in the field of cancer immunotherapy.85, 86, 87”
From Tutorial on monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and its considerations in early development (2018) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Kufer's 1995 study is cited as a 2008 clinical trial
MinorThe cited reference 44 is a 2008 paper by Fury and colleagues, not the 1995 Kufer study described in the text.
“In 1995, Kufer and collaborators produced such a tandem scFv targeting EpCAM (epithelial 17-1A antigen) and human CD3 in CHO cells.This new kind of bsAb proved to be highly cytotoxic at nanomolar concentrations against various cell lines, using unstimulated human PBMCs in the absence of co-signaling. 44”
“44. Fury MG, Lipton A, Smith KM, Winston CB, Pfister DG. A phase-I trial of the epidermal growth fac- tor receptor directed bispecific antibody MDX-447 without and with recombinant human granulocyte- colony stimulating factor in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2008; 57:155-63.”
A 2008 blinatumomab result is cited to a 2000 paper
MinorThe text attributes the first result of a 2008 blinatumomab clinical study to reference 54, which lists a 2000 paper on a different class of bispecific antibody.
“In 2008, the first result of a Phase 1 clinical study indicated that doses as low as 5 μg per square meter per day in relapsed NHL patients led to an elimination of target cells in blood.All seven patients treated at a dose level of 60 μg experienced a tumor regression. 54”
“54. Zeidler R, Mysliwietz J, Csanady M, Walz A, Ziegler I, Schmitt B, et al. The Fc-region of a new class of intact bispecific antibody mediates activation of accessory cells and NK cells and induces direct phagocytosis of tumour cells. Br J Cancer 2000; 83:261-6.”
Lindhofer's 1995 paper is cited as a 2006 paper
MinorThe text cites reference 21 for a paper that Lindhofer and collaborators published in 1995, but reference 21 lists a 2006 paper by Schlereth and colleagues.
“In 1995, Lindhofer and collaborators published a paper describing a major improvement of the classical quadroma approach to produce bsAbs. 21”
“21. Schlereth B, Quadt C, Dreier T, Kufer P, Lorenczewski G, Prang N, et al. T-cell activation and B-cell deple- tion in chimpanzees treated with a bispecific anti- CD19/anti-CD3 single-chain antibody construct. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2006; 55:503-14.”
Cites
Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity
Köhler, G., & Milstein, C. (1975) · Nature · doi:10.1038/256495a0 · Cited by 17,200 · see citing works
Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains
Hamers-Casterman, C., Atarhouch, T., Muyldermans, S., Robinson, G., Hammers, C., Songa, E. B., Bendahman, N., & Hammers, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363446a0 · Cited by 3,241 · see citing works
FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age
Roopenian, D. C., & Akilesh, S. (2007) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2155 · Cited by 2,346 · see citing works
Cytokine Storm in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-CD28 Monoclonal Antibody TGN1412
Suntharalingam, G., Perry, M. R., Ward, S., Brett, S. J., Castello-Cortes, A., Brunner, M. D., & Panoskaltsis, N. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa063842 · Cited by 2,164 · see citing works
Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains
Holliger, P., & Hudson, P. J. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1142 · Cited by 1,928 · see citing works
Cartron, G., Dacheux, L., Salles, G., Solal‐Céligny, P., BARDOS, P., Colombat, P., & Watier, H. (2002) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v99.3.754 · Cited by 1,902 · see citing works
Therapeutic antibodies: successes, limitations and hopes for the future
Chames, P., Van Regenmortel, M., Weiss, E., & Baty, D. (2009) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00190.x · Cited by 1,382 · see citing works
Self-citationTumor Regression in Cancer Patients by Very Low Doses of a T Cell–Engaging Antibody
Bargou, R., Leo, E., Zugmaier, G., Klinger, M., Goebeler, M., Knop, S., Noppeney, R., Viardot, A., Hess, G., Schuler, M., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158545 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Ward, E. S., Güssow, D., Griffiths, A. D., Jones, P., & Winter, G. P. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/341544a0 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
"Diabodies": small bivalent and bispecific antibody fragments.
Holliger, P., Prospero, T. D., & Winter, G. P. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.14.6444 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Greenberg, A. S., Avila, D. W., Hughes, M. K., Hughes, A. L., McKinney, E. C., & Flajnik, M. F. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/374168a0 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Bispecific T-Cell Engaging Antibodies for Cancer Therapy
Baeuerle, P. A., & Reinhardt, C. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0547 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
The Emerging Role of EpCAM in Cancer and Stem Cell Signaling
Munz, M., Baeuerle, P. A., & Gires, O. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0654 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Hybrid antibodies can target sites for attack by T cells
Staerz, U. D., Kanagawa, O., & Bevan, M. J. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/314628a0 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Löffler, A., Kufer, P., Lutterbüse, R., Zettl, F., Daniel, P. T., Schwenkenbecher, J. M., Riethmüller, G., Dörken, B., & Bargou, R. C. (2000) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v95.6.2098 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
The intriguing role of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in antitumor reactions
Di Carlo, E., Forni, G., Lollini, P., Colombo, M. P., Modesti, A., & Musiani, P. (2001) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v97.2.339 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Development trends for monoclonal antibody cancer therapeutics
Reichert, J. M., & Valge-archer, V. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2241 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Offner, S., Hofmeister, R., Romaniuk, A., Kufer, P., & Baeuerle, P. A. (2006) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2005.03.007 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. 1975.
Köhler, G., & Milstein, C. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Mack, M., Riethmüller, G., & Kufer, P. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.15.7021 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Efficient inhibition of EGFR signalling and of tumour growth by antagonistic anti-EGFR Nanobodies
Roovers, R. C., Laeremans, T., Huang, L., Taeye, S. D., Verkleij, A. J., Revets, H., de Haard, H., & Henegouwen, P. M. P. V. B. E. (2006) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-006-0180-4 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Dhodapkar, K. M., Krasovsky, J., Williamson, B., & Dhodapkar, M. V. (2002) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20011097 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Domain antibodies: proteins for therapy
Holt, L. J., Herring, C., Jespers, L. S., Woolven, B. P., & Tomlinson, I. M. (2003) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.08.007 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Hoffmann, P., Hofmeister, R., Brischwein, K., Brandl, C., Crommer, S., Bargou, R., Itin, C., Prang, N., & Baeuerle, P. A. (2005) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.20908 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Specific targeting of cytotoxic T cells by anti-T3 linked to anti-target cell antibody
Perez, P., Hoffman, R. W., Shaw, S., Bluestone, J. A., & Segal, D. M. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/316354a0 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Antitumor effect of locally produced CD95 ligand
Seino, K., Kayagaki, N., Okumura, K., & Yagita∥, H. (1997) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0297-165 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Conrath, K., Lauwereys, M., Wyns, L., & Muyldermans, S. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m007734200 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
BiTEs: bispecific antibody constructs with unique anti-tumor activity
Wolf, E., Hofmeister, R., Kufer, P., Schlereth, B., & Baeuerle, P. A. (2005) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(05)03554-3 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Burges, A., Wimberger, P., Kümper, C., Gorbounova, V., Sommer, H., Schmalfeldt, B., Pfisterer, J., Lichinitser, M., Makhson, A., Moiseyenko, V., et al. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2769 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Brischwein, K., Schlereth, B., Guller, B., Steiger, C., Wolf, A., Lutterbuese, R., Offner, S., Locher, M., Urbig, T., Raum, T., et al. (2006) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2005.07.034 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Imaging Tumors with an Albumin-Binding Fab, a Novel Tumor-Targeting Agent
Dennis, M. S., Jin, H., Dugger, D. L., Yang, R., McFarland, L. M., Ogasawara, A. K., Williams, S. P., Cole, M. J., Ross, S., & SCHWALL, R. H. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-2531 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Müller, D., Karle, A. C., Meißburger, B., Höfig, I., Stork, R., & Kontermann, R. E. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m700820200 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Lindhofer, H., Mocikat, R., Steipe, B., & Thierfelder, S. (1995) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.155.1.219 · Cited by 213 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In 1995, Lindhofer and collaborators published a paper describing a major improvement of the classical quadroma approach to produce bsAbs.(21) By using an original subclass combination (mouse IgG2a and rat IgG2b), they demonstrated a preferential speciesrestricted heavy/light chain pairing, in contrast to the random p…”
BackgroundRossi, E. A., Goldenberg, D. M., Cardillo, T. M., McBride, W. J., Sharkey, R. M., & Chang, C.-H. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600982103 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Zeidler, R., Reisbach, G., Wollenberg, B., Lang, S., Chaubal, S., Schmitt, B., & Lindhofer, H. (1999) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.163.3.1246 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Anti-serum albumin domain antibodies for extending the half-lives of short lived drugs
Holt, L. J., Basran, A., Jones, K. H., Chorlton, J., Jespers, L. S., Brewis, N., & Tomlinson, I. M. (2008) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzm067 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Dreier, T., Baeuerle, P. A., Fichtner, I., Grün, M., Schlereth, B., Lorenczewski, G., Kufer, P., Lutterbüse, R., Riethmüller, G., Gjorstrup, P., et al. (2003) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.170.8.4397 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Zeidler, R., Mysliwietz, J., Csánady, M., Walz, A., Ziegler, I., Schmitt, B., Wollenberg, B., & Lindhofer, H. (2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1237 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Brischwein, K., Parr, L., Pflanz, S., Volkland, J., Lumsden, J., Klinger, M., Locher, M., Hammond, S. A., Kiener, P., Kufer, P., et al. (2007) · Journal of Immunotherapy · doi:10.1097/cji.0b013e318156750c · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Fusion of Two Immunoglobulin-producing Myeloma Cells
Cotton, R. G. H., & Milstein, C. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/244042a0 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Single-domain antibodies as building blocks for novel therapeutics
Saerens, D., Ghassabeh, G. H., & Muyldermans, S. (2008) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2008.07.006 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Lu, D., Zhang, H., Koo, H., Tonra, J. R., Balderes, P. J., Prewett, M. C., Corcoran, E., Mangalampalli, V. R. M., Bassi, R., Anselma, D. J., et al. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m500815200 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Induction of a long-lasting antitumor immunity by a trifunctional bispecific antibody
Ruf, P., & Lindhofer, H. (2001) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v98.8.2526 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
The Roles of CD28 and CD40 Ligand in T Cell Activation and Tolerance
Howland, K. C., Ausubel, L. J., London, C. A., & Abbas, A. K. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4465 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Leonard, J. P., Coleman, M., Ketas, J. C., Ashe, M., Fiore, J. M., Furman, R. R., Niesvizky, R., Shore, T. B., Chadburn, A., Horne, H. B., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.13.821 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Karpovsky, B., Titus, J. A., Stephany, D. A., & Segal, D. M. (1984) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.160.6.1686 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
A revival of bispecific antibodies
Kufer, P., Lutterbüse, R., & Baeuerle, P. A. (2004) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.006 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Takimoto, C. H. M., & Awada, A. H. (2007) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-007-0639-9 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Treatment of Refractory Hodgkin's Disease With an Anti-CD16/CD30 Bispecific Antibody
Hartmann, F., Renner, C., Jung, W., Deisting, C., Juwana, M., Eichentopf, B., Kloft, M., & Pfreundschuh, M. (1997) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v89.6.2042 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Goldenberg, D. M., Rossi, E. A., Sharkey, R. M., McBride, W. J., & Chang, C. (2007) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.046185 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Clinical experience with CD64-directed immunotherapy. An overview
Curnow, R. T. (1997) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s002620050435 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Phase I trial of 2B1, a bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting c-erbB-2 and Fc gamma RIII.
Weiner, L. M., Clark, J. I., Davey, M., Li, W. S., de Palazzo, I. G., Ring, D. B., & Alpaugh, R. K. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Optimizing engagement of the immune system by anti-tumor antibodies: an engineer's perspective
Desjarlais, J. R., Lazar, G. A., Zhukovsky, E. A., & Chu, S. Y. (2007) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2007.08.009 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Schlereth, B., Fichtner, I., Lorenczewski, G., Kleindienst, P., Brischwein, K., da Silva, A., Kufer, P., Lutterbuese, R., Junghahn, I., Kasimir-Bauer, S., et al. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-2637 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Molecular advances in pretargeting radioimunotherapy with bispecific antibodies.
Chang, C., Sharkey, R. M., Rossi, E. A., Karacay, H., McBride, W., Hansen, H. J., Chatal, J., Barbet, J., & Goldenberg, D. M. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Memory T cells need CD28 costimulation to remember
Boesteanu, A. C., & Katsikis, P. D. (2009) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2009.02.005 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Lu, D., Zhang, H., Ludwig, D. L., Persaud, A., Jimenez, X., Burtrum, D. B., Balderes, P. J., Liu, M., Böhlen, P., Witte, L., et al. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m310132200 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
PEGylation and Multimerization of the Anti-p185HER-2 Single Chain Fv Fragment 4D5
Kubetzko, S., Balic, E., Waibel, R., Zangemeister‐Wittke, U., & Plückthun, A. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m604127200 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Stockmeyer, B., Dechant, M., van Egmond, M., Tutt, A. L., Sundarapandiyan, K., Graziano, R. F., Repp, R., Kalden, J. R., Gramatzki, M., Glennie, M. J., et al. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.165.10.5954 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Immunotherapy of malignant ascites with trifunctional antibodies
Heiss, M. M., Ströhlein, M. A., Jäger, M., Kimmig, R., Burges, A., Schoberth, A., Jauch, K., Schildberg, F., & Lindhofer, H. (2005) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.21165 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Bispecific antibody pretargeting PET (immunoPET) with an 124I-labeled hapten-peptide.
McBride, W. J., ZANZONICO, P. B., Sharkey, R. M., Norén, C., Karacay, H., Rossi, E. A., Losman, M. J., Brard, P.-Y., Chang, C., Larson, S. M., et al. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Schlereth, B., Quadt, C., Dreier, T., Kufer, P., Lorenczewski, G., Prang, N., Brandl, C., Lippold, S., Cobb, K., Brasky, K., et al. (2006) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-005-0001-1 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Sebastian, M., Passlick, B., Friccius-Quecke, H., Jäger, M., Lindhofer, H., Kanniess, F., Wiewrodt, R. G., Thiel, E., Buhl, R., & Schmittel, A. H. (2007) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-007-0310-7 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Cancer imaging and therapy with bispecific antibody pretargeting
Goldenberg, D. M., Chatal, J., Barbet, J., Boerman, O. C., & Sharkey, R. M. (2007) · Update on Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.uct.2007.04.003 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Hartmann, F., Renner, C., Jung, W. E., Costa, L. M. D., Tembrink, S., Held, G., Sek, A., König, J., Bauer, S., Kloft, M., et al. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Béhar, G., Sibéril, S., Groulet, A., Chames, P., Pugnière, M., Boix, C., Sautès‐Fridman, C., Teillaud, J., & Baty, D. (2007) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzm064 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationJäger, M., Schoberth, A., Ruf, P., Hess, J., & Lindhofer, H. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2861 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
PAM4-Reactive MUC1 Is a Biomarker for Early Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Gold, D. V., Karanjawala, Z., Modrak, D. E., Goldenberg, D. M., & Hruban, R. H. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1488 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Kipriyanov, S. M., Cochlovius, B., Schäfer, H., Moldenhauer, G., Bähre, A., Gall, F. L., Knackmuss, S. H. J., & Little, M. (2002) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.137 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Amann, M., Brischwein, K., Lutterbuese, P., Parr, L., Petersen, L., Lorenczewski, G., Krinner, E., Bruckmeier, S., Lippold, S., Kischel, R., et al. (2008) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2182 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Repp, R., van Ojik, H. H., Valerius, T., Groenewegen, G., Wieland, G., Oetzel, C., Stockmeyer, B., Becker, W., Eisenhut, M., Steininger, H., et al. (2003) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601367 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Fury, M. G., Lipton, A., Smith, K. M., Winston, C. B., & Pfister, D. G. (2007) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-007-0357-5 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Hombach, A. A., Jung, W. E., Pohl, C., Renner, C., Şahin, U., Schmits, R., Wolf, J., Kapp, U., Diehl, V., & Pfreundschuh, M. G. (1993) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910550523 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Arndt, M. A. E., Krauß, J., Kipriyanov, S. M., Pfreundschuh, M. G., & Little, M. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v94.8.2562.420k20_2562_2568 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Recombinant bispecific antibodies for cellular cancer immunotherapy.
Müller, D., & Kontermann, R. E. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Bühler, P., Wolf, P., Gierschner, D., Schaber, I., Katzenwadel, A., Schultze-Seemann, W., Wetterauer, U., Tacke, M., Swamy, M., Schamel, W. W. A., et al. (2008) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-007-0348-6 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Grabert, R. C., Cousens, L. P., Smith, J. A., Olson, S., Gall, J., Young, W. B., Davol, P. A., & Lum, L. G. (2006) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-2005 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Lutterbuese, R., Raum, T., Kischel, R., Lutterbuese, P., Schlereth, B., Schaller, E., Mangold, S., Rau, D., Meier, P., Kiener, P. A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Immunotherapy · doi:10.1097/cji.0b013e31819b7c70 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Bispecific Antibodies: Molecules That Enable Novel Therapeutic Strategies
Fischer, N., & Léger, O. J. P. (2007) · Pathobiology · doi:10.1159/000101046 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Sharkey, R. M., Karacay, H., Litwin, S., Rossi, E. A., McBride, W. J., Chang, C.-H., & Goldenberg, D. M. (2008) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0037 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Lichtenstein, A. K., & Kahle, J. (1985) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910350119 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Asano, R., Sone, Y., Makabe, K., Tsumoto, K., Hayashi, H., Katayose, Y., Unno, M., Kudo, T., & Kumagai, I. (2006) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0059 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Stanglmaier, M., Faltin, M., Ruf, P., Bodenhausen, A., Schröder, P., & Lindhofer, H. (2008) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.23626 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Grosse‐Hovest, L., Hartlapp, I., Marwan, W., Brem, G., Rammensee, H., & Jung, G. (2003) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.200323322 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Bispecific antibodies targeting cancer cells
Peipp, M., & Valerius, T. (2002) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0300507 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Midorikawa, Y., Yamashita, T., & Sendo, F. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Pullarkat, V., Deo, Y., Link, J., Spears, L., Marty, V., Curnow, R., Groshen, S., Gee, C., & Weber, J. S. (1999) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s002620050543 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Schlereth, B., Kleindienst, P., Fichtner, I., Lorenczewski, G., Brischwein, K., Lippold, S., da Silva, A., Locher, M., Kischel, R., Lutterbüse, R., et al. (2005) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-005-0082-x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Two new trifunctional antibodies for the therapy of human malignant melanoma
Ruf, P., Jäger, M., Ellwart, J., Wosch, S., Kusterer, E., & Lindhofer, H. (2004) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.11630 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Orientation of antigen binding sites in dimeric and trimeric single chain Fv antibody fragments
Lawrence, L. J., Kortt, A. A., Iliades, P., Tulloch, P. A., & Hudson, P. J. (1998) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00292-0 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Buhmann, R., Simoes, B., Stanglmaier, M., Yang, T., Faltin, M., Bund, D., Lindhofer, H., & Kolb, H.-J. (2009) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/bmt.2008.323 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
VALONE, F. H., KAUFMAN, P. A., GUYRE, P. M., LEWIS, L. D., MEMOLI, V., ERNSTOFF, M. S., WELLS, W., BARTH, R., DEO, Y., FISHER, J., et al. (1995) · Journal of Hematotherapy · doi:10.1089/scd.1.1995.4.471 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Otz, T., Große-Hovest, L., Hofmann, M., Rammensee, H.-G., & Jung, G. (2009) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2008.271 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Morecki, S., Lindhofer, H., Yacovlev, E., Gelfand, Y., Ruf, P., & Slavin, S. (2008) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2008.03.005 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
The new face of bispecific antibodies: targeting cancer and much more
Lum, L. G., Davol, P. A., & Lee, R. J. (2006) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2005.07.013 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
de Palazzo, I. G., Gerçel-Taylor, Ç., Kitson, J., & Weiner, L. M. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Classification of CEA‐related positivity in primary and metastatic malignant melanoma
Sanders, D. S. A., Evans, A. T., Allen, C. A., Bryant, F. J., Johnson, G. D., Hopkins, J., Stocks, S. C., Marsden, J. R., & Kerr, M. A. (1994) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1711720409 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Grosse‐Hovest, L., Wick, W., Minoia, R., Weller, M., Rammensee, H., Brem, G., & Jung, G. (2005) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.21294 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Manzke, O., Titzer, S., Tesch, H., Diehl, V., & Bohlen, H. (1997) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s002620050432 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Human neutrophil interactions of a bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting tumor and human Fcγ RIII
Weiner, L. M., Alpaugh, R. K., Amoroso, A. R., Adams, G. P., Ring, D. B., & Barth, M. W. (1996) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s002620050264 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Cioca, D., Deak, E., Cioca, F., & Păunescu, V. (2005) · Journal of Immunotherapy · doi:10.1097/01.cji.0000175496.51594.8b · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Schweizer, C., Strauß, G., Lindner, M., Marmé, A., Deo, Y. M., & Moldenhauer, G. (2002) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-002-0326-y · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Kischel, R., Hausmann, S., Baeuerle, P. A., & Kufer, P. (2009) · Cancer Research · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Parsons, S. L., Hennig, M., Linke, R., Klein, A., Lahr, A., Lindhofer, H., & Heiss, M. M. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e14000 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Radioimmunotherapy of Solid Tumors: From Fairytale to Reality
Adams, G. P., & Weiner, L. M. (2001) · Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals · doi:10.1089/108497801750095925 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Chames P, 2009, Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel, 12, 276
- Hartmann F, 2001, Clin Cancer Res, 7, 1873
- Parsons S, 2009, J Clin Oncol, 27
- Muller D, 2007, Curr Opin Mol Ther, 9, 319
- Kischel R, 2008, Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res, 99, 2404
- McBride WJ, 2006, J Nucl Med, 47, 1678
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies
Muyldermans, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-063011-092449 · Cited by 2,304 · see citing works
Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipeline
Labrijn, A. F., Janmaat, M. L., Reichert, J. M., & Parren, P. W. H. I. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0028-1 · Cited by 1,303 · see citing works
Combination cancer immunotherapies tailored to the tumour microenvironment
Smyth, M. J., Ngiow, S. F., Ribas, A., & Teng, M. W. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.209 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
The making of bispecific antibodies
Brinkmann, U., & Kontermann, R. E. (2017) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1268307 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Strategies and challenges for the next generation of therapeutic antibodies
Beck, A., Wurch, T., Bailly, C., & Corvaı̈a, N. (2010) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2747 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Therapeutic antibodies for autoimmunity and inflammation
Chan, A. C., & Carter, P. J. (2010) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2761 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
T cell-engaging therapies — BiTEs and beyond
Goebeler, M.-E., & Bargou, R. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0347-5 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Schäfer, W. M., Regula, J. T., Bähner, M., Schanzer, J., Croasdale, R., Dürr, H., Gassner, C., Georges, G. J., Kettenberger, H., Imhof-Jung, S., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019002108 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Bispecific T‐cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy
Huehls, A. M., Coupet, T. A., & Sentman, C. L. (2014) · Immunology and Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/icb.2014.93 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Nelson, A. L. (2010) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.2.1.10786 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Progress in biopharmaceutical development
Kęsik-Brodacka, M. (2017) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.1617 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Schaefer, G., Haber, L., Crocker, L., Shia, S., Shao, L., Dowbenko, D. J., Tótpál, K., Wong, A., Lee, C. V., Stawicki, S. S., et al. (2011) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.003 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Efficient generation of stable bispecific IgG1 by controlled Fab-arm exchange
Labrijn, A. F., Meesters, J. I., de Goeij, B. E. C. G., van den Bremer, E. T. J., Neijssen, J., van Kampen, M. D., Strumane, K., Verploegen, S. A. B. W., Kundu, A., Gramer, M. J., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1220145110 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Nanobodies and Their Potential Applications
Hassanzadeh‐Ghassabeh, G., Devoogdt, N., Pauw, P. E. M. D., Vincke, C., & Muyldermans, S. (2013) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm.13.86 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Tutorial on monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and its considerations in early development
Ovacik, M., & Lin, K. (2018) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12567 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
A review of bispecific antibodies and antibody constructs in oncology and clinical challenges
Suurs, F. V., Hooge, M. N. L., de Vries, E. G. E., & de Groot, D. J. A. (2019) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.04.006 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Bispecific antibodies: design, therapy, perspectives
Sedykh, S. E., Prinz, V. Y., Buneva, V. N., & Nevinsky, G. A. (2018) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s151282 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Bispecific antibodies and their applications
Fan, G., Wang, Z., Hao, M., & Li, J. (2015) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-015-0227-0 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Seimetz, D., Lindhofer, H., & Bokemeyer, C. (2010) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.03.001 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Protein conjugation with genetically encoded unnatural amino acids
Kim, C. H., Axup, J. Y., & Schultz, P. G. (2013) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.04.017 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Generation of bispecific IgG antibodies by structure-based design of an orthogonal Fab interface
Lewis, S. M., Wu, X., Pustilnik, A., Sereno, A., Huang, F., Rick, H. L., Guntas, G., Leaver‐Fay, A., Smith, E. M., Ho, C., et al. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2797 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Bispecific antibody based therapeutics: Strengths and challenges
Thakur, A. B., Huang, M. T. F., & Lum, L. G. (2018) · Blood Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.blre.2018.02.004 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Applications of synthetic biology in medical and pharmaceutical fields
Yan, X., Liu, X., Zhao, C., & Chen, G. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01440-5 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Targeted cancer therapy through antibody fragments-decorated nanomedicines
Alibakhshi, A., Kahaki, F. A., Ahangarzadeh, S., Yaghoobi, H., Yarian, F., Arezumand, R., Ranjbari, J., Mokhtarzadeh, A., & de la Guárdia, M. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.10.036 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Immunotherapies: Exploiting the Immune System for Cancer Treatment
Koury, J., Lucero, M., Cato, C., Chang, L., Geiger, J., Henry, D., Hernandez, J., Hung, F., Kaur, P., Teskey, G., et al. (2018) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2018/9585614 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer
Shuptrine, C. W., Surana, R., & Weiner, L. M. (2012) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.12.009 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Synthesis of Bispecific Antibodies using Genetically Encoded Unnatural Amino Acids
Kim, C. H., Axup, J. Y., Dubrovska, A., Kazane, S. A., Hutchins, B. A., Wold, E. D., Smider, V. V., & Schultz, P. G. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja303904e · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Bi-specific Aptamers Mediating Tumor Cell Lysis
Boltz, A., Piater, B., Toleikis, L., Guenther, R., Kolmar, H., & Hock, B. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.238261 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Wang, L., Liang, H., Sun, J., Liu, Y., Li, J., Li, J., Li, J., & Yang, H. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b05123 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
A tale of two specificities: bispecific antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic applications
Byrne, H., Conroy, P. J., Whisstock, J. C., & O’Kennedy, R. J. (2013) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.08.007 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Mandikian, D., Takahashi, N., Lo, A. A., Li, J., Eastham-Anderson, J., Slaga, D., Ho, J., Hristopoulos, M., Clark, R., Totpal, K., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0657 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Hudak, J. E., Barfield, R. M., de Hart, G. W., Grob, P., Nogales, E., Bertozzi, C. R., & Rabuka, D. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201108130 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Controlled Fab-arm exchange for the generation of stable bispecific IgG1
Labrijn, A. F., Meesters, J. I., Priem, P., de Jong, R. N., van den Bremer, E. T. J., van Kampen, M. D., Gerritsen, A. F., Schuurman, J., & Parren, P. W. H. I. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.169 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Bispecific Anti-HIV-1 Antibodies with Enhanced Breadth and Potency
Bournazos, S., Gazumyan, A., Seaman, M. S., Nussenzweig, M. C., & Ravetch, J. V. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.050 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Structural and functional characterization of the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab
Chelius, D., Ruf, P., Gruber, P., Plöscher, M., Liedtke, R., Gansberger, E., Heß, J., Wasiliu, M., & Lindhofer, H. (2010) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.2.3.11791 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Wals, K., & Ovaa, H. (2014) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2014.00015 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Bispecific Antibodies for Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Perspectives
Müller, D., & Kontermann, R. E. (2010) · BioDrugs · doi:10.2165/11530960-000000000-00000 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Golay, J., & Introna, M. (2012) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2012.02.011 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
The future of antibodies as cancer drugs
Reichert, J. M., & Dhimolea, E. (2012) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2012.04.006 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Koshkaryev, A., Sawant, R. R., Deshpande, M., & Torchilin, V. P. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.009 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Prodrug Applications for Targeted Cancer Therapy
Giang, I., Boland, E. L., & Poon, G. M. K. (2014) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9638-z · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Engineering Aggregation-Resistant Antibodies
Perchiacca, J. M., & Tessier, P. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-062011-081052 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
The development of bispecific antibodies and their applications in tumor immune escape
Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Fan, D., & Xiong, D. (2017) · Experimental Hematology and Oncology · doi:10.1186/s40164-017-0072-7 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Caraccio, C., Krishna, S., Phillips, D. J., & Schürch, C. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00501 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Moore, G. L., Bautista, C., Pong, E., Nguyen, D.-H. T., Jacinto, J. M., Eivazi, A., Muchhal, U. S., Karki, S., Chu, S. Y., & Lazar, G. A. (2011) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.3.6.18123 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Translation and Clinical Development of Bispecific T‐cell Engaging Antibodies for Cancer Treatment
Yuraszeck, T. M., Kasichayanula, S., & Benjamin, J. (2017) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.651 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Breast cancer immunotherapy: Current and novel approaches
Barzaman, K., Moradi‐Kalbolandi, S., Hosseinzadeh, A., Kazemi, M. H., Khorramdelazad, H., Safari, E., & Farahmand, L. (2021) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107886 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Challenges in Antibody Development against Tn and Sialyl-Tn Antigens
Loureiro, L. R., Carrascal, M. A., Barbas, A., Ramalho, J. S., Novo, C., Delannoy, P., & Videira, P. A. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5031783 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Combinatorial antibody libraries: new advances, new immunological insights
Lerner, R. A. (2016) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2016.67 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Novel Monoclonal Antibodies for Cancer Treatment: The Trifunctional Antibody Catumaxomab (Removab®)
Seimetz, D. (2011) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.2.309 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Therapeutic targets and recent advances in protein immunotoxins
Madhumathi, J., & Verma, R. S. (2012) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2012.05.006 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Bispecific small molecule–antibody conjugate targeting prostate cancer
Kim, C. H., Axup, J. Y., Lawson, B. R., Yun, H., Tardif, V., Choi, S. H., Zhou, Q., Dubrovska, A., Biroc, S. L., Marsden, R., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1316026110 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Replacing Antibodies: Engineering New Binding Proteins
Banta, S. A., Dooley, K., & Shur, O. (2013) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152412 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Structural basis of a novel heterodimeric Fc for bispecific antibody production
Wei, H., Cai, H., Jin, Y., Wang, P., Zhang, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Cheng, J., Zeng, N., Xu, T., et al. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17558 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Current trends and challenges in the downstream purification of bispecific antibodies
Chen, S. W., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Antibody Therapeutics · doi:10.1093/abt/tbab007 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Chemical and Enzymatic Methods for Post-Translational Protein–Protein Conjugation
Taylor, R. J., Geeson, M. B., Journeaux, T., & Bernardes, G. J. L. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c00129 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Production of stable bispecific IgG1 by controlled Fab-arm exchange
Gramer, M. J., van den Bremer, E. T. J., van Kampen, M. D., Kundu, A., Kopfmann, P., Etter, E., Stinehelfer, D., Long, J., Lannom, T., Noordergraaf, E. H., et al. (2013) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.26233 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Bispecific antibody platforms for cancer immunotherapy
Lameris, R., de Bruin, R. C. G., Schneiders, F. L., Henegouwen, P. M. P. V. B. E., Verheul, H. M. W., de Gruijl, T. D., & van der Vliet, H. J. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.08.003 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Therapeutic application of monoclonal antibodies in cancer: advances and challenges
Modjtahedi, H., Ali, S., & Essapen, S. (2012) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/lds032 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Dong, J., Sereno, A., Aivazian, D., Langley, E. J., Miller, B., Snyder, W. B., Chan, E., Cantele, M., Morena, R., Joseph, I. B. J., et al. (2011) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.3.3.15188 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Advances in bispecific biotherapeutics for the treatment of cancer
May, C., Sapra, P., & Gerber, H. (2012) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2012.07.011 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Hosseini, S. S., Khalili, S., Baradaran, B., Bidar, N., Shahbazi, M., Mosafer, J., Hashemzaei, M., Mokhtarzadeh, A., & Hamblin, M. R. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.058 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Ahamadi-Fesharaki, R., Fateh, A., Vaziri, F., Solgi, G., Siadat, S. D., Mahboudi, F., & Jamnani, F. R. (2019) · Molecular Therapy — Oncolytics · doi:10.1016/j.omto.2019.02.004 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Liu, Z., Leng, E. C., Gunasekaran, K., Pentony, M., Shen, M., Howard, M., Stoops, J. D., Manchulenko, K., Razinkov, V. I., Liu, H., et al. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.620260 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Liu, Z., Gunasekaran, K., Wang, W., Razinkov, V. I., Sekirov, L., Leng, E. C., Sweet, H., Foltz, I. N., Howard, M., Rousseau, A.-M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.513366 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Pimentel, V. O., Yaromina, A., Marcus, D., Dubois, L. J., & Lambin, P. (2020) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jim.2020.112899 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Rhoden, J. J., Dyas, G. L., & Wroblewski, V. J. (2016) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.714287 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Zhu, G., Foletti, D. L., Liu, X., Ding, S., Witt, J. M., Hasa-Moreno, A., Rickert, M., Holz, C., Aschenbrenner, L. M., Yang, A. H., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44874-0 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Lu, H., Zhou, Q., Deshmukh, V. A., Phull, H. S., Ma, J., Tardif, V., Naik, R. R., Bouvard, C., Zhang, Y., Choi, S., et al. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201405353 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Rader, C. M. (2011) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-02-337691 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Rozan, C., Cornillon, A., Pétiard, C., Chartier, M., Béhar, G., Boix, C., Kerfélec, B., Robert, B., Pèlegrin, A., Chames, P., et al. (2013) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-1012 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationHan, L., Chen, J., Ding, K., Zong, H., Xie, Y., Jiang, H., Zhang, B., Lu, H., Yin, W.-H., Gilly, J. A., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08641-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Harms, B. D., Kearns, J. D., Iadevaia, S., & Lugovskoy, A. A. (2013) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.07.017 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Engineering and Pharmacology of Blood–Brain Barrier-Permeable Bispecific Antibodies
Stanimirovic, D. B., Kemmerich, K., Haqqani, A. S., & Farrington, G. K. (2014) · Advances in pharmacology · doi:10.1016/bs.apha.2014.06.005 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
B7H6-Specific Bispecific T Cell Engagers Lead to Tumor Elimination and Host Antitumor Immunity
Wu, M.-R., Zhang, T., Gacerez, A. T., Coupet, T. A., DeMars, L. R., & Sentman, C. L. (2015) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1402517 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Schmohl, J. U., Felices, M., Todhunter, D., Taras, E. P., Miller, J. S., & Vallera, D. A. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.12073 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
From immune checkpoints to vaccines: The past, present and future of cancer immunotherapy
Osipov, A., Murphy, A. G., & Zheng, L. (2019) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/bs.acr.2019.03.002 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Biological Therapies in the Treatment of Cancer—Update and New Directions
Papiez, M. A., & Krzyściak, W. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222111694 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Antibody-guided nanomedicines as novel breakthrough therapeutic, diagnostic and theranostic tools
Farahavar, G., Abolmaali, S. S., Gholijani, N., & Nejatollahi, F. (2019) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c9bm00931k · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Immune cell engagers in solid tumors: promises and challenges of the next generation immunotherapy
Fucà, G., Spagnoletti, A., Ambrosini, M., de Braud, F., & Nicola, M. D. (2021) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100046 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Fab-based bispecific antibody formats with robust biophysical properties and biological activity
Wu, X., Sereno, A., Huang, F., Lewis, S. M., Lieu, R., Weldon, C. L., Torres, C., Fine, C., Batt, M. A., Fitchett, J. R., et al. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1022694 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Cheng, J. C., Liang, M., Carvalho, M. F., Tigue, N. J., Faggioni, R., Roskos, L. K., & Vainshtein, I. (2020) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib9030049 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Prognostic and therapeutic role of CLEC12A in acute myeloid leukemia
Morsink, L. M., Walter, R. B., & Ossenkoppele, G. J. (2018) · Blood Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.blre.2018.10.003 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The many faces of FcγRI: implications for therapeutic antibody function
Swisher, J. F. A., & Feldman, G. M. (2015) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12334 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Richards, S. M., Amaravadi, L. S., Pillutla, R. C., Birnboeck, H., Torri, A., Cowan, K. J., Papadimitriou, A., Garofolo, F., Satterwhite, C. M., Piccoli, S. P., et al. (2016) · Bioanalysis · doi:10.4155/bio-2016-4989 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Applying nanomedicine in maladaptive inflammation and angiogenesis
Alaarg, A., Pérez‐Medina, C., Metselaar, J. M., Nahrendorf, M., Fayad, Z. A., Storm, G., & Mulder, W. J. M. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.05.009 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Therapeutic Applications of an Expanded Genetic Code
Sun, S. B., Schultz, P. G., & Kim, C. H. (2014) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.201402154 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
IgE immunotherapy: A novel concept with promise for the treatment of cancer
Josephs, D. H., Spicer, J. F., Karagiannis, P., Gould, H. J., & Karagiannis, S. N. (2014) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.27029 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Homogeneous Bispecifics by Disulfide Bridging
Hull, E. A., Livanos, M., Miranda, E., Smith, M. E. B., Chester, K. A., & Baker, J. R. (2014) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc5002467 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Engineering multi-specific antibodies against HIV-1
Padte, N. N., Yu, J., Huang, Y., & Ho, D. D. (2018) · Retrovirology · doi:10.1186/s12977-018-0439-9 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Glorius, P., Baerenwaldt, A., Kellner, C., Staudinger, M., Dechant, M., Stauch, M. B., Beurskens, F. J. M., Parren, P. W. H. I., van de Winkel, J. G. J., Valerius, T., et al. (2012) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2012.150 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Mohan, N., Luo, X. L., Shen, Y., Olson, Z., Agrawal, A., Endo, Y., Rotstein, D. S., Pelosof, L. C., & Wu, W. J. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13051027 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Novel immunotherapies for hematologic malignancies
Nelson, M. H., & Paulos, C. M. (2014) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12245 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Muda, M., Gross, A. W., Dawson, J., He, C., Kurosawa, E., Schweickhardt, R. L., Dugas, M., Soloviev, M., Bernhardt, A., Fischer, D., et al. (2011) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzq123 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Bispecific Antibodies and Trispecific Immunocytokines for Targeting the Immune System Against Cancer
Fournier, P., & Schirrmacher, V. (2012) · BioDrugs · doi:10.1007/s40259-012-0008-z · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Forte, N., Livanos, M., Miranda, E., Morais, M., Yang, X., Rajkumar, V. S., Chester, K. A., Chudasama, V., & Baker, J. R. (2018) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00795 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Controlling the viscosities of antibody solutions through control of their binding sites
Kastelic, M., Dill, K. A., Kalyuzhnyi, Y. V., & Vlachy, V. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.106 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Dominguez, A. L., & Lustgarten, J. (2009) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.153 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Multiformat T‐Cell‐Engaging Bispecific Antibodies Targeting Human Breast Cancers
Cao, Y. J., Axup, J. Y., Ma, J. S. Y., Wang, R. E., Choi, S., Tardif, V., Lim, R. K. V., Pugh, H. M., Lawson, B. R., Welzel, G., et al. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201500799 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Turini, M., Chames, P., Bruhns, P., Baty, D., & Kerfélec, B. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2093 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Chames, P., & Baty, D.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 539-547
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-0870
- PMC
- PMC2791310
- OpenAlex
- W1848910860
- Semantic Scholar
- f85480341850bb514971c5c8b11769d3ec48fa5b
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- mAbs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
- Keywords
- bispecific antibodies, cancer immunotherapy, antibody engineering, catumaxomab, T cell redirection, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, monoclonal antibodies, clinical trials
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibody Specificity, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms, Recombinant Proteins, Protein Engineering, Treatment Outcome, Antibodies, Bispecific
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review