Cited by 155CAR-T cell therapy researchImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Induction of a central memory and stem cell memory phenotype in functionally active CD4+ and CD8+ CAR T cells produced in an automated good manufacturing practice system for the treatment of CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Open access
Blaeschke, Franziska, Stenger, Dana, Kaeuferle, Theresa, Willier, Semjon, Lotfi, Ramin, Kaiser, Andrew Didier, Assenmacher, Mario, Döring, Michaela +2 more·2018·Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy

Abstract

Relapsed/refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pre-B ALL) remains a major therapeutic challenge. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are promising treatment options. Central memory T cells (Tcm) and stem cell-like memory T cells (Tscm) are known to promote sustained proliferation and persistence after T-cell therapy, constituting essential preconditions for treatment efficacy. Therefore, we set up a protocol for anti-CD19 CAR T-cell generation aiming at high Tcm/Tscm numbers. 100 ml peripheral blood from pediatric pre-B ALL patients was processed including CD4+/CD8+-separation, T-cell activation with modified anti-CD3/-CD28 reagents and transduction with a 4-1BB-based second generation CAR lentiviral vector. The process was performed on a closed, automated device requiring additional manual/open steps under clean room conditions. The clinical situation of these critically ill and refractory patients with leukemia leads to inconsistent cellular compositions at start of the procedure including high blast counts and low T-cell numbers with exhausted phenotype. Nevertheless, a robust T-cell product was achieved (mean CD4+ = 50%, CD8+ = 39%, transduction = 27%, Tcm = 50%, Tscm = 46%). Strong proliferative potential (up to > 100-fold), specific cytotoxicity and low expression of co-inhibitory molecules were documented. CAR T cells significantly released TH1 cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 upon target-recognition. In conclusion, partly automated GMP-generation of CAR T cells from critically small blood samples was feasible with a new stimulation protocol that leads to high functionality and expansion potential, balanced CD4/CD8 ratios and a conversion to a Tcm/Tscm phenotype.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00262-018-2155-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CliniMACS Prodigy integrates all cell processing steps from T cell separation, CAR transduction, cell expansion, and formulation in a device using a single-use chamber and tubing set under GMP compliance.

    “To this end, we used a closed semi-automated platform, CliniMACS Prodigy, that integrates all cell processing steps from T cell separation, CAR transduction, cell expansion, and formulation in a device using a single-use chamber and tubing set under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) compliance.10,11”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [2]2. Stenger D, Blaeschke F, Kaeuferle T, Willier S, Lotfi R, Kaiser A, Assenmacher M, Doering M, Feucht J, Feuchtinger T (2017) Automated generation of central memory and stem cell-like memory CD19-specific CAR T cells in a closed, GMP compatible system. In: Cellular therapy, international symposium Erlangen, Erlangen (Abstract 134)
  2. [7]7. Kochenderfer JN, Dudley ME, Kassim SH, Somerville RP, Carpenter RO, Stetler-Stevenson M, Yang JC, Phan GQ, Hughes MS, Sherry RM, Raffeld M, Feldman S, Lu L, Li YF, Ngo LT, Goy A, Feldman T, Spaner DE, Wang ML, Chen CC, Kranick SM, Nath A, Nathan DA, Morton KE, Toomey MA, Rosenberg SA (2015) Chemotherapy-refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and indolent B-cell malignancies can be effectively treated with autologous T cells expressing an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor. J Clin Oncol 33(6):540-549. https ://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2025 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [8]8. Porter DL, Levine BL, Kalos M, Bagg A, June CH (2011) Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 365(8):725-733. https ://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMo a1103 849
  4. [9]9. Orlowski RJ, Porter DL, Frey NV (2017) The promise of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs) in leukaemia. Br J Haematol 177(1):13-26. https ://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14475 · DOI
  5. [10]10. Maude S, Barrett DM (2016) Current status of chimeric antigen receptor therapy for haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 172(1):11-22. https ://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.13792 · DOI
  6. [11]11. Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Riviere I (2013) The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov 3(4):388-398. https ://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0548 · DOI
  7. [12]12. Sotillo E, Barrett DM, Black KL, Bagashev A, Oldridge D, Wu G, Sussman R, Lanauze C, Ruella M, Gazzara MR, Martinez NM, Harrington CT, Chung EY, Perazzelli J, Hofmann TJ, Maude SL, Raman P, Barrera A, Gill S, Lacey SF, Melenhorst JJ, Allman D, Jacoby E, Fry T, Mackall C, Barash Y, Lynch KW, Maris JM, Grupp SA, Thomas-Tikhonenko A (2015) Convergence of acquired mutations and alternative splicing of CD19 enables resistance to CART-19 immunotherapy. Cancer Discov 5(12):1282-1295. https ://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1020 · DOI
  8. [13]13. Jacoby E, Nguyen SM, Fountaine TJ, Welp K, Gryder B, Qin H, Yang Y, Chien CD, Seif AE, Lei H, Song YK, Khan J, Lee DW, Mackall CL, Gardner RA, Jensen MC, Shern JF, Fry TJ (2016) CD19 CAR immune pressure induces B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia lineage switch exposing inherent leukaemic plasticity. Nat Commun 7:12320. https ://doi.org/10.1038/ncomm s1232 0 · DOI
  9. [14]14. Wang X, Popplewell LL, Wagner JR, Naranjo A, Blanchard MS, Mott MR, Norris AP, Wong CW, Urak RZ, Chang WC, Khaled SK, Siddiqi T, Budde LE, Xu J, Chang B, Gidwaney N, Thomas SH, Cooper LJ, Riddell SR, Brown CE, Jensen MC, Forman SJ (2016) Phase 1 studies of central memory-derived CD19 CAR T-cell therapy following autologous HSCT in patients with B-cell NHL. Blood 127(24):2980-2990. https ://doi.org/10.1182/blood -2015-12-68672 5 · DOI
  10. [17]17. Feucht J, Kayser S, Gorodezki D, Hamieh M, Doring M, Blaeschke F, Schlegel P, Bosmuller H, Quintanilla-Fend L, Ebinger M, Lang P, Handgretinger R, Feuchtinger T (2016) T-cell responses against ­ CD19 + pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia mediated by bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) are regulated contrarily by PD-L1 and CD80/CD86 on leukemic blasts. Oncotarget 7(47):76902-76919. https ://doi.org/10.18632 /oncot arget .12357
  11. [18]18. Cherkassky L, Morello A, Villena-Vargas J, Feng Y, Dimitrov DS, Jones DR, Sadelain M, Adusumilli PS (2016) Human CAR T cells with cell-intrinsic PD-1 checkpoint blockade resist tumormediated inhibition. J Clin Investig 126(8):3130-3144. https ://doi. org/10.1172/JCI83 092 · DOI
  12. [19]19. Hollyman D, Stefanski J, Przybylowski M, Bartido S, BorquezOjeda O, Taylor C, Yeh R, Capacio V, Olszewska M, Hosey J, Sadelain M, Brentjens RJ, Riviere I (2009) Manufacturing validation of biologically functional T cells targeted to CD19 antigen for autologous adoptive cell therapy. J Immunother 32(2):169-180. https ://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0b013 e3181 94a6e 8 · DOI
  13. [20]20. Mock U, Nickolay L, Philip B, Cheung GW, Zhan H, Johnston IC, Kaiser AD, Peggs K, Pule M, Thrasher AJ, Qasim W (2016) Automated manufacturing of chimeric antigen receptor T cells for adoptive immunotherapy using CliniMACS prodigy. Cytotherapy 18(8):1002-1011. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [21]21. Schneider D, Xiong Y, Wu D, Nlle V, Schmitz S, Haso W, Kaiser A, Dropulic B, Orentas RJ (2017) A tandem CD19/CD20 CAR lentiviral vector drives on-target and off-target antigen modulation in leukemia cell lines. J Immunother Cancer 5:42. https ://doi. org/10.1186/s4042 5-017-0246-1 · DOI
  15. [22]22. Gardner RA, Finney O, Annesley C, Brakke H, Summers C, Leger K, Bleakley M, Brown C, Mgebroff S, Kelly-Spratt KS, Hoglund V, Lindgren C, Oron AP, Li D, Riddell SR, Park JR, Jensen MC (2017) Intent-to-treat leukemia remission by CD19 CAR T cells of defined formulation and dose in children and young adults. Blood 129(25):3322-3331. https ://doi.org/10.1182/blood -201702-76920 8 · DOI
  16. [23]23. Lock D, Mockel-Tenbrinck N, Drechsel K, Barth C, Mauer D, Schaser T, Kolbe C, Al Rawashdeh W, Brauner J, Hardt O, Pflug N, Holtick U, Borchmann P, Assenmacher M, Kaiser A (2017) Automated manufacturing of potent CD20-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells for clinical use. Hum Gene Ther 28(10):914925. https ://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2017.111 · DOI
  17. [24]24. Montini E, Cesana D, Schmidt M, Sanvito F, Bartholomae CC, Ranzani M, Benedicenti F, Sergi LS, Ambrosi A, Ponzoni M, Doglioni C, Di Serio C, von Kalle C, Naldini L (2009) The genotoxic potential of retroviral vectors is strongly modulated by vector design and integration site selection in a mouse model of HSC gene therapy. J Clin Investig 119(4):964-975. https ://doi. org/10.1172/JCI37 630 · DOI
  18. [25]25. Turtle CJ, Hanafi LA, Berger C, Gooley TA, Cherian S, Hudecek M, Sommermeyer D, Melville K, Pender B, Budiarto TM, Robinson E, Steevens NN, Chaney C, Soma L, Chen X, Yeung C, Wood B, Li D, Cao J, Heimfeld S, Jensen MC, Riddell SR, Maloney DG (2016) CD19 CAR-T cells of defined ­ CD4 + :CD8 + composition in adult B cell ALL patients. J Clin Investig 126(6):2123-2138. https ://doi.org/10.1172/JCI85 309 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaeschke, F., Stenger, D., Kaeuferle, T., Willier, S., Lotfi, R., Kaiser, A. D., Assenmacher, M., Döring, M., Feucht, J., & Feuchtinger, T.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Miltenyi Biotec (Germany) (DE)
  • University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Feuchtinger, Tobias
Venue
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
Published
2018-03-31
Volume
67
Issue
7
Pages
1053-1066
ISSN
  • 0340-7004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0851
OpenAlex
W2795246883
Cited by
155
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Care-for-Rare Foundation
  • Mehr LEBEN für Krebskranke Kinder – Bettina-Bräu-Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
chimeric antigen receptor T cells, central memory T cells, stem cell memory T cells, anti-CD19 CAR, B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia, relapsed/refractory leukemia, 4-1BB, lentiviral vectors, T cell activation, T cell exhaustion, cytokine production, pediatric leukemia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cytotoxicity, Immunologic, Female, Humans, Immunologic Memory, Lymphocyte Activation, Phenotype, Prognosis, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Stem Cells, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Cytokines, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Antigens, CD19, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review