Cited by 58Tendon Structure and TreatmentLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Effectiveness of polydeoxyribonucleotide injection versus normal saline injection for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: A prospective randomised clinical trial

Kim, Jae Kwang, Chung, Jae Yoon·2015·International Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) has been used for the treatment of chronic tendinosis. This prospective randomised study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and complications of PDRN injection for treatment of plantar fasciitis. Methods Forty patients with a clinical diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were randomly allocated to PDRN injection (PDRN group, n = 20) or normal saline injection (placebo group, n = 20). Injections were performed weekly for three weeks. Clinical evaluations were done at baseline and four and 12 weeks after treatment began using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for foot pain and Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). We also monitored the complications in both groups at one, two, four and 12 weeks after initial treatment. Results The PDRN group achieved a significant improvement in VAS and MOXFQ scores at four weeks after treatment, and this improvement continued until 12 weeks after treatment. On the other hand, the placebo group did not achieve a significant improvement in the VAS or MOXFQ scores at four or 12 weeks. The initial VAS and MOXFQ scores of the PDRN group were not significantly different from those of the placebo group. At four weeks after treatment, the VAS and MOXFQ scores of the PDRN group were better than those of the placebo group, but the difference was not statistically significant. At 12 weeks after treatment, the VAS and MOXFQ scores of the PDRN group were significantly better than those of the placebo group. We not…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00264-015-2772-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical dosing regimens for PDRN vary depending on indication, with low-dose/low-level protocols often used for cosmetic and esthetic purposes and high-dose/high-level protocols reserved for regenerative therapies and wound repair.

    “Clinical dosing regimens vary depending on the indication, and low-dose/low-level protocols are often used for cosmetic and esthetic purposes, where high-dose/high-level protocols are reserved for regenerative therapies and wound repair [19,144,176,177].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J. K., & Chung, J. Y.
Affiliations
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jae Kwang
Venue
International Orthopaedics
Published
2015-04-29
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
1329-1334
ISSN
  • 0341-2695 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5195
OpenAlex
W2032501755
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Orthopaedics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
PharmaResearch Products
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
polydeoxyribonucleotide, plantar fasciitis, injection therapy, foot pain, treatment efficacy, injection complications, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Injections, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Polydeoxyribonucleotides, Prospective Studies, Wound Healing, Treatment Outcome, Fasciitis, Plantar, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review